Jump to content

Why no bus service over the Brooklyn Bridge?


1995 Orion V CNG

Recommended Posts


Can a C40LF fit on the bridge?

There's an 8,000 lb weight restriction, and a 10' height restriction on the bridge. The C40 is 11' 4" and is well over 8,000 lbs.

 

We had a thread about this ages ago that turned into multiple pages of nonsense and it got locked.

 

You're not gonna see a bus on the bridge, end of discussion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's likely because there is no need for a bus to go on the Brooklyn Bridge. There is a subway for people who would use City Hall service. The B51 was a route using the Manhattan Bridge that ran between City Hall and Downtown Brooklyn, but discontinued due to budget cuts and low ridership.

Is there a reason why they brought back the B39 but not the B51?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always said they should use mini-buses then.

It is a more direct route to City Hall, and so would probably do better that the B51.

 

And also, they actually did consider adding regular buses to the bridge in the old East River Crossings Manhattan Bridge [train] Alternatives study, but it would require modification of “certain ramps”, and it was dropped in favor of the cheaper alternative of a bus-only lane on the Manhattan Bridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always said they should use mini-buses then.

It is a more direct route to City Hall, and so would probably do better that the B51.

 

And also, they actually did consider adding regular buses to the bridge in the old East River Crossings Manhattan Bridge [train] Alternatives study, but it would require modification of “certain ramps”, and it was dropped in favor of the cheaper alternative of a bus-only lane on the Manhattan Bridge.

What, like New Flyer MIDIs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that passes the weight and any height restrictions, then sure; though I was assuming cutaways more. (If (MTA) didn't want to run those, then I would see something like maybe even contracting Access-A-ride to run the route with some of their vans).

Or something like a Brevia, which is about the size of a cutaway, but looks just like an RTS, to fit in with more of the (MTA) fleet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that passes the weight and any height restrictions, then sure; though I was assuming cutaways more. (If (MTA) didn't want to run those, then I would see something like maybe even contracting Access-A-ride to run the route with some of their vans).

Or something like a Brevia, which is about the size of a cutaway, but looks just like an RTS, to fit in with more of the (MTA) fleet.

 

It would be very expensive for the MTA to operate a fleet of mini-buses that would have no use elsewhere and would operate with full-time BOs (and whether or not union contracts allow operating this sort of bus is actually a good question).

 

If there were demand for such a bus, there would probably be one similar to the Downtown Connection buses (since both Lower Manhattan and Downtown Brooklyn have a BID, and the Downtown Connection buses are run by the Lower Manhattan one anyways). There's not really a reason to have one though; it's not a particularly bad walk, both areas are covered in CitiBike stations, and there's not a need for disabled people to use it since nearby subway stations in the respective areas are wheelchair accessible.

 

Isn't the MTA trying to shave costs with Access-a-Ride because it's too expensive to provide, and it's actually cheaper to just pay for taxi vouchers? Using Access-a-Ride would be extremely expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be very expensive for the MTA to operate a fleet of mini-buses that would have no use elsewhere and would operate with full-time BOs (and whether or not union contracts allow operating this sort of bus is actually a good question).

 

If there were demand for such a bus, there would probably be one similar to the Downtown Connection buses (since both Lower Manhattan and Downtown Brooklyn have a BID, and the Downtown Connection buses are run by the Lower Manhattan one anyways). There's not really a reason to have one though; it's not a particularly bad walk, both areas are covered in CitiBike stations, and there's not a need for disabled people to use it since nearby subway stations in the respective areas are wheelchair accessible.

 Yeah, that's what I think too. I mean, the only route that could us them would be like the B39, B42, B74. Lines like those. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, that's what I think too. I mean, the only route that could us them would be like the B39, B42, B74. Lines like those.

The B42 doesn't reach no where near the other side of Brooklyn. It runs as a shuttle transfer from the Rockaway L train station to The Canarsie Pier as its last stop. The B39 cross the Williamsburg Bridge to downtown Manhattan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only two Bridge that are access for Bus to cross on from Brooklyn to Manhattan are Manhattan Bridge and Williamsburg Bridge. Brooklyn Bridge is out of the question due to weight and height restriction.

 

Me personally, I hardly ever take the Bklyn Bridge just to get into Manhattan. Both Williamsburg and Manhattan Bridge feels faster when theres no traffic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be very expensive for the MTA to operate a fleet of mini-buses that would have no use elsewhere and would operate with full-time BOs (and whether or not union contracts allow operating this sort of bus is actually a good question).

 

If there were demand for such a bus, there would probably be one similar to the Downtown Connection buses (since both Lower Manhattan and Downtown Brooklyn have a BID, and the Downtown Connection buses are run by the Lower Manhattan one anyways). There's not really a reason to have one though; it's not a particularly bad walk, both areas are covered in CitiBike stations, and there's not a need for disabled people to use it since nearby subway stations in the respective areas are wheelchair accessible.

 

Isn't the MTA trying to shave costs with Access-a-Ride because it's too expensive to provide, and it's actually cheaper to just pay for taxi vouchers? Using Access-a-Ride would be extremely expensive.

Well, then, maybe a new private company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.