BM5 via Woodhaven Posted May 30, 2015 Share #1 Posted May 30, 2015 2014 New Flyer C40LF 496 on the Q60 at Queens Blvd/ Woodhaven Blvd by BM5 via Woodhaven, on Flickr IMG_8857 by BM5 via Woodhaven, on Flickr 1999 New Flyer D60HF "Galaxy" Articulated 1006 on the M102 at 3 Avenue/57 Street by BM5 via Woodhaven, on Flickr 2002 MCI D4500CL 2930 on the BM2 at 5 Avenue/53 Street by BM5 via Woodhaven, on Flickr 2002 MCI D4500CL 2930 on the BM2 at 5 Avenue/53 Street by BM5 via Woodhaven, on Flickr 2007 MCI D4500CL 3422 on the BxM9 at 5 Avenue/ 54 Street by BM5 via Woodhaven, on Flickr 2001 MCI D4500CL 2159 on the X27 at 57 Street/5 Avenue by BM5 via Woodhaven, on Flickr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BreeddekalbL Posted May 30, 2015 Share #2 Posted May 30, 2015 EDIT: oh nevermind these were the former nybs MCI'S what are their #'s now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cait Sith Posted May 30, 2015 Share #3 Posted May 30, 2015 they rehabbed 2930?! Not a rehab. 7423-7428 are getting renumbered to 2925-2930 due to the Xcelsiors coming in. My question is, which ex-7400 is this unit.....since they have a knack for doing this improperly or not in numeric order. -EDIT- It's 7424 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calvin Posted May 30, 2015 Share #4 Posted May 30, 2015 surprisingly saw 7427 yesterday which is now renumbered Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Via Garibaldi 8 Posted May 30, 2015 Share #5 Posted May 30, 2015 2930 Looks good... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BreeddekalbL Posted May 30, 2015 Share #6 Posted May 30, 2015 Not a rehab. 7423-7428 are getting renumbered to 2925-2930 due to the Xcelsiors coming in. My question is, which ex-7400 is this unit.....since they have a knack for doing this improperly or not in numeric order. -EDIT- It's 7424 if i am not mistaken weren't these nybs buses originally supposed to go to the TA but were rejected and were gonna be numbered what they are now? if i am correct it's ironic..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattTrain Posted May 30, 2015 Share #7 Posted May 30, 2015 Funny thing was that those Ex-NYBS MCIs were NYC Transit bus rejects. Had they accepted, those would have been numbered 2925-2930 anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCI D4000 81994 Posted June 1, 2015 Share #8 Posted June 1, 2015 What was the reason they were rejected in the first place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
East New York Posted June 2, 2015 Share #9 Posted June 2, 2015 Funny thing was that those Ex-NYBS MCIs were NYC Transit bus rejects. Had they accepted, those would have been numbered 2925-2930 anyway Facts! What was the reason they were rejected in the first place? They were actually deferred and NYBS snapped them up. Great shots by the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BM5 via Woodhaven Posted June 2, 2015 Author Share #10 Posted June 2, 2015 Facts! They were actually deferred and NYBS snapped them up. Great shots by the way. Interesting, learn something new every day, I also wanted to know why they were rejected. Thanks, man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.