Jump to content

collagedchen300

Veteran Member
  • Posts

    66
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by collagedchen300

  1. Okey-dokey. When the 572 is finished being repainted, show us the photoshots of that vehicle.Also, for Q58, if "lack of funding" has almost nothing to do with the excessively long waiting for the bus but a bump on the thread, then what do you guys think is the reason for that hold-up? Sent from my SM-N9208 using Tapatalk
  2. And not only that situation, there is given insufficient funds for MTA to run more buses (including vehicle #572) as I mentioned with my parents in my family's car, felt shocked of the occupation commotion as we saw there at college Point Blvd and Fowler Avenue yesterday (last Sunday, April 23 at almost 3 in the afternoon). There were a HUGE amount of people taking up a block, where the gas station is, waiting for a bus around an hour, where cars barely stopped there for refuel. (I'm not allowed to talk politics any further in this forum, or Cait Sith will ban me permanently, but my off-topic is the reason) Sent from my SM-N9208 using Tapatalk
  3. I just guess. I am referring to some parts of the bus. Sent from my SM-N9208 using Tapatalk
  4. Probably, most of buses cannot be repainted. Situation like that happened to those buses must be broken and taken for repair, I think. Sent from my SM-N9208 using Tapatalk
  5. On Saturday, April 8, 2017, at hour 1520, I saw a Q55 bus passing the Adams Street & Bklyn Supreme Court b25/38/52 bus stop. There is only one passenger riding the Q55 bus. Its vehicle number is 6498, and the top electronic sign says "Q55 Woodhaven Blvd". I cannot take pictures of the bus because I am not authorised to snapshot govt's property. Anyway, Let me ask you guys the concern, how come one bus is operating Q55 as at Downtown Brooklyn? Sent from my SM-N9208 using Tapatalk
  6. ...and will be also their alternative. Con: at Canarise Rockaway, they will expect longer travel time if they want 8 Av via 14 Street in manhattan. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  7. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/07/26/nyregion/l-train-will-shut-down-between-manhattan-and-brooklyn-in-2019-for-18-months.html?_r=0&referer=Then, as the NYC times news above, what if the line will be suspended for 18 months starting from 2019? Hint: B39 should be ridden for alternative. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  8. However, how's that peak express if driving via I678? For outbound, should've be going to I278 after I495 to get to Whitestone expy due to crammed EB LIE after Maspeth? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  9. Super express for both QM2 and 20. They go straight to LIE from Manhattan via 34 from 6 avThis one is not from my experiences of those two express bus routes. I checked them in Transits Mobile app. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. I took QM25 when I am going to Manhattan DOB at Downtown. Since QM10 and 11 have shorter headways than 7 and 8, how about just 10 and 11 should help Eliot Avenue Westbound, so QM24, 25, and 34 will take LIE from 69 St to avoid backtracking, the reason for waste of time. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  11. But in other route... make sure beware of the rush hour traffic, like along Broadway. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  12. Yep. I agreed to whom asked for extinction of Q52. But still neutral. The bad news is, Broadway won't have enough room in each bus to pack a huge line of crowds during peak hours. Suggest to just let Q52 retire before promoting 53 into Select Bus Service. Also, since Broadway traffic during peak hour still going AWOL, gotta need alternative route, maybe use Corona Av, and 92 Street, in case there's traffic also at queens blvd, and becaude its existing route had followed the subway line between Roosevelt Avenue - Jackson Heights and Woodhaven Blvd consecutively.
  13. Or just extend Q52 (proposed SBS) to 74 Street Jackson Heights, then let it take Corona Av from Broadway, then right at 92 Street just every peak hours. How's that? Pro: Moving away from cluttered Broadway traffic, and relieve crowds along Corona Av Con: scenic route; may also experience traffic at 92 Street
  14. B39 extension Here are pros and cons: Pros: 1. deals with rush-hour crowds from and trains 2. Another way to travel to Manhattan Cons as our concerns, 1. As Trainmaster5 questioned above my post, if b39 operates via its extension full-time; It is for peaks hours only 2. Heavy traffic at Williamsburg bridge and major roadd The outbound terminus from Manhattan, you decide since I am a beginner of this forum, even though I rode with your company a lot. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  15. Just a suggestion to take care of crowds, mostly on buses heading towards and from Downtown Brooklyn/Manhattan, during peak hours... via B39 extension. If you think this is still unnecessary, how so? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  16. I had looked over my transit app, and I had not found any bus routes plying along Bushwick Avenue. Also, B39, currently serving Manhattan stops, needs an extension to grow our business bigger. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  17. And this is the similar solution for Q38, just like splitting M5, into 5 and 55 along their route. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  18. Good idea, better than mines. Q58 is really crowded every peak hours somewhere at grand avenue and Queens Blvd. like you said, two heads going to/from flushing better than one.Also, B57 sometimes come with same frustration like your situation about Q59, the delay at Red Hook because the road is narrow over there; the last year, forget it. Sometimes, passengers have to wait like an hour or so.
  19. And since I agreed to Kamen Rider about the heavy traffic, then first of all, I take it back about Q18, and second, we had thought to move the Q58 to ply via Eliot Avenue for its shorter headway. Route: Instead of Grand Avenue, Q58 shall follow existing Q38 to Woodhaven Blvd, via Q53 to Broadway and Justice, then its own regular existing route to Flushing. Now if you think this is still awkward like my proposal for Q18, feel free to correct me. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  20. And here is a exclaimed response from T J Trainman: "1 answer NO!! Not happening. Nothing is getting transferred to and from NYCT/MTAB." from my locked post. This is because I didn't know what policy you guys in MTA have about the transits. I only know the abstractions about MTA because I had rode with your company a lot, wanting to save my inheritance from buying a car, as the daily basis, while waiting for more convenience. Maybe just some hints, don't have to be a whole thing, so I could fix our aforementioned concerns about my proposal above. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  21. Also, similar to Flushing having Q19 to Astoria and 66 to Long Island City Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  22. Proposals for Q18 and Q58 I would like to introduce you the suggestion to switch around with these two bus routes. Some times like around last years winter season, Q58 buses had taken almost two hours to get from Flushing, to its terminus. Another reason, I don't think many commuters expect to go to flushing, only reachable to Manhattan. Also, let's think that Astoria is not so far from Ridgewood with my plan; equal to having Q39 at Forest Avenue, also in case train may experience any situations like switch problems due to increment weather. 1. Q18 from Ridgewood Terminal (Palmetto Street and Cornelia Av), to Astoria (27 Avenue and 2 Street) via superseded Q58 route then, Regular Service: via its existing routes, or... Limited service: via existing Q47 route between Grand Avenue and Garfield Avenue, along 69 Street, then its existing route I. Route informations for Regular Service: 1. 76 Stops (48-75 minutes) 2. Inbound: Astoria bound buses will make all their existing bus stops after Grand Avenue and Queens Midtown Expressway Overpass 3. Outbound: Ridgewood term bound buses will make all their existing bus stops before Grand Avenue and Remsen Place, then making all its superseded Q58 bus stops II. Route Informations for Limited Service: 1. 40 Stops (49-51 minutes) 2. Inbound: Astoria bound Buses will go straight along 69 Street, making just existing Q47 bus stops, after Grand Avenue, then making all their existing bus stops after Garfield Avenue 3. Outbound: Ridgewood terminal bound buses will go straight along 69 street, after 50 avenue and 67 Street, making just existing Q47 bus stops, and after 69 Street and 53 Avenue, they will bypass all the way to Fresh Pond Road and Flushing Avenue, and making just their superseded Q58 Limited bus stops 4. Buses will be available every weekdays only III. Subway Transfers * denotes not recommended transfer due to crowding ** denotes not durable transfer if increment weather happens *** denotes both situations above Ridgewood Terminal <=> ***1. and trains at Myrtle and Wyckoff Avenues, near the terminus at Palmetto Street and Wyckoff Avenue **2. train at Fresh Pond road, near the bus stop at 67 Avenue and Fresh Pond Road *3. and peak hour trains at Woodside - 61 Street, near the bus stop at Woodside Avenue and 61 Street (Not recommended during peak hours, instead, use transfers below or 5) 4. Weeknight , weekday , and Daytime trains at Northern Blvd and Broadway, near the bus stop at Broadway and 56 Street 5. and weekday trains at 30 Avenue - Grand Avenue, near the bus stop at 30 Avenue and 31 Street <=>Astoria Frequency: Same rate as B38 (5-9 Buses per hour) 2. Q58 from Maspeth (Grand Avenue and 64 Street), to Flushing (41 Road and Main Street) I. Route Information 1. 36 Stops (27-50 minutes) via Grand Avenue, then all existing bus stops after its first one II. Benefits for this proposal: Downtown Brooklyn-Queens Easy-Transfer Routes: 1. Inbound (Downtown Brooklyn): Transfer to Red Hook bound B57 at Flushing Avenue and 61 Street of Maspeth bound Q58 2. Inbound (Long Island City): Transfer to Q39 from the terminus (61 Street and Grand Avenue) of Maspeth bound Q58 3. Outbound (Flushing): Transfer to Flushing bound Q58 from the terminus (Grand Avenue and 64 Street) of Maspeth bound B57 Frequency: 6-10 buses per hour Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  23. Pretty reasonable, strongly agreed. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  24. Like one of your discussion about q52 and 53, you would implant SBS, and sending more buses during peak hours to resolve crowding. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.