Jump to content
Attention: In order to reply to messages, create topics, have access to other features of the community you must sign up for an account.


Senior Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

40 Excellent

Profile Information

  • Location
    New York

Recent Profile Visitors

596 profile views
  1. No matter what car you're in, the four center sections of seats fit seven people each, totaling 28. This doesn't include the corner seats. So here's the numbers: "A" Car with driver's/conductor's cab: 32 Seats (28 center + 4 corner) "B and C" cars with no cab: 40 Seats (28 Center + 12 corner) Overall they're shitty, dirty, smelly cars with very few seats available (especially during rush hour with the seat hoggers). The design is very inefficient and the R188s look like they just took a redbird out of the ocean and made it stainless steel. Absolutely THE worst train cars I've ever seen.
  2. When the all the 179s and 211s are delivered, are the 32s, 42s, and 46s finally being retired? Those cars are disgusting piles of trash and I'd hope for reliability sake that the oldest train in the system is a 68. We should be like other cities and make the system all new-tech instead of worrying about a little window at the front of the train. Like seriously, it's not that hard to get out of the stone age!
  3. So basically there’s a net gain of two cars? I wonder if two extra cars are already stored in the yard. Regarding the R262, I think the order should be a combination of both 6-car and 5-car sets with open thruways, that way they can run on the shuttle and the 7. It would work well to improve capacity without the extra half cabs and distance between cars. But that’s for the R262 thread.
  4. Hi all. I’m doing a personal project for openbve and it is the K-Class (MP51) PATH model. I have found no videos of the cars online and can only guess about the sequence of the rollsign readings. I also have no idea of what the cab looks like so I’ll presume it looks like the cab of a redbird (since they were both built by St. Louis). What I really need to know is if anyone can personally attest to riding/seeing/hearing the K cars in service (since none were saved for museums). What did the propulsion sound like, and was it GE or WH? Was the K Car a SMEE? How many power and brake notches? What did the train sound like when the brakes were applied or released, was it like an R33? I know this is a lot to ask for, but given that the negligent Port Authority failed to preserve any K-Cars after the fleet was purged in 2011, I have very few resources to work with. I already have diagrams and have made a full exterior shell, but that’s about it. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
  5. I haven’t frequented this part of the forum yet (I’m generally a subway fan), but in case it hasn’t been said already, could someone please tell me how many M2 cars still exist? I hope that at least one car is being preserved for a museum! If not could someone bring this to the MTA’s attention before it’s too late, because it would be a MAJOR shame to see these cars disappear and be lost to history. There have been several recent incidents in which cars weren’t preserved when they were retired (like the PATH K-Car) and I wouldn’t want that to happen again. Thanks!
  6. What's funny about your comment is that I innocently walked into that little alcove many years ago! It was in the back of the train (so no T/O) and I figured it was a new experiment or something, so I looked out the back of the train as the tunnel blurred by (I am also a frequent rider so I was used to looking out the front or back). Then a very nice supervisor (with some special MTA logo on his jacket) kindly told me that it was a mistake and that the door shouldn't be closed 90 degrees. He said it was "a different design" than the singles on the 7 train.
  7. *She But yes, this is what I’m talking about:
  8. Anybody notice the spike in “half cab” incidents on the R62A trains? I’m talking about when the door is closed inward by accident and forms a half cab. (I saw a half cab on the back of a train yesterday, and another time on the 6 line.) Is this an employee’s fault or might this be the work of the subway vandals who broke into the trains a few years ago? There is a post on Instagram that showed a half cab too. It’s weird.
  9. You’d think after 8+ years of closing the tunnels on weekends that things wouldn’t be burning up anymore. Not to open a can of worms, but an N line extension through LaGuardia and out to Willets Point would REALLY help alleviate the disastrous delays (and crowds)! The 7 line is the only East-West route in queens besides Queens Blvd.
  10. According to Wikipedia, the R30 half that was on display at the (former) ASICS store on 42nd and 5th has been removed and scrapped. Can anyone verify this?
  11. Could someone please explain to me why rollsigns have ASTORIA BLVD on them, when clearly it’s impossible to terminate a train at Astoria blvd without using the switches at Ditmars and and already end up AT THE PLATFORM at Ditmars??? We’re there every switches just south of Astoria blvd? I checked 1996 track maps and it hasn’t changed.
  12. It was just an extra, because the current signs were all printed 1988 and later. The 1985 signs (which were one piece rather than three) had 121 as an option.
  13. Exactly right. But I’m saying if the doors need to be locked, people should be able to “escape” the car by some means, without having to break the big window on the storm door (which is possible only because of the rubber window frame)
  14. Hi all, I’m aware that MANY years back, some subway trains had fire exinguishers (as well as emergency door releases, similar to present-day buses.) I’m wondering if the following things would be feasible. 1) Put fire extinguisher in every functional full width cab (if they aren’t there already). Leave the intermediate “abandoned” cabs alone, and in the case of R32/R42 trains, only put a fire extinguisher in the front/rear and middle car. 2) Add an emergency door release lever, if there’s no emergency intercom already installed for passengers I’m particularly targeting this at the 75’ cars (R46, R68, etc) that have their end doors locked. When the infamous F train got stuck in a tunnel, there was no way for passengers in “isolated” areas of the train to get help. Customers were left in the dark unsuccessfully trying to pry the side doors open. This is a safety issue because no passenger should be stranded in a car. Ideally, every car should have either an intercom or a door release. In my humble opinion, I think investing in safety is more worthwhile than spending money on LED lights, digital ads, and full cabs. What do you guys think?
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.