Your response here is abridging my actual reply; you are going outside the scope of my reply, with the addition of random generalizations.
I'm not going to waste my time here, I'll keep each response short and sweet.
You're repeating what you've said previously, I already explained this whole B36 and B74 phenomenon. The reason I mentioned Ulmer Park, contrary to what you see it is as, was to hint the fact that the depot can handle extra equipment regardless of its size. Thus making a more serviceable B36 actually possible with the right circumstances.
We're talking about the B6, I don't know why you're bringing that statistic up. I'd say this is deserving of the irrelevant title.
The B11, with my proposal, is still going to have that connection..? I rest you said, I response with a hefty 'Ok.'
It's my perspective, can't get mad at someone's opinion right? Get some propriety.
You misinterpreted my usage of 'pivotal'. I was referring to Vanderbilt and Vanderbilt only. I never mentioned the 'B67 being a pivotal giant', with that, I can care less for the rest said as it was said based off a misinterpretation.
Well assuming you didn't make any counterargument to that B100 justification, I can safely say you do not have anything else to say about that. There are other roads that B41's at layover can take to get back to the main King Plaza terminal? That wouldn't exacerbate anything, it'll give the terminal more breathing room in terms of bus presence.