Amiri the subway guy

Oh really and where is that?

I hope your aware that the MTA is not a private community for fun and games and that they have to know what the people want not what you want

The problem is that we don’t have enough data to see how service on Broadway really runs

Really bro? That comment makes absolutely zero f**king sense once so ever. Expansion is a complete separate issue from these so called “merges”. I already fought that deinterlining is a stupid pipe dream but to claim that we cannot expand the subway system all because of a few merges is a stupid and retarded excuse! So according to your logic, we should just cancel the 2nd avenue project all because the merges with the and will merge with the future ? Or the Utica avenue and Rockway branches studies should just be burned because those respective routes merge with each other? mAkE “CoMPlEtE SEsNe”!🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️(Sarcasm)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=XZxzJGgox_E&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F&source_ve_path=Mjg2NjY&feature=emb_logo

Could you guy think of something without deinterlining? None of these plans make sense

That’s exactly what I’ve been trying to them him

Any one else here?

Yes I’ve mostly accepted that. Me and some of the other railfans had big dreams and ideas for the 2nd Avenue line, but looking at the areas now I could safely say perhaps we all bite more than we could chew. I still wanna run the up 3rd avenue Gun Hill Road up the Bronx and the up on 125th street crosstown west Harlem to 153rd street.

Yeah I would post on the proposal page but unfortunately it turn into a war zone

YOURE WRONG! I Was literally trying to stop this petty argument

Meh, still not really the best idea. I feel like deinterlining is a pipe dream. Anyways do you got any ideals for a 2nd avenue proposal

it’s a awful idea that makes no sense

Hey guys I’m in a debate with TMC on if deinterlining is a good idea, do any of you agree with me?

Look I have my opinions and you got your opinions ok? I’ll just leave it as that