Jump to content


Attention: In order to reply to messages, create topics, have access to other features of the community you must sign up for an account.

Metro CSW

Veteran Member
  • Content Count

    2,315
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1,500 Excellent

About Metro CSW

  • Rank
    A former fan....

Profile Information

  • Location
    Everywhere and nowhere

Contact Methods

  • Skype
    MisterCSW7375

Recent Profile Visitors

9,817 profile views
  1. Modifying Ulmer Park slightly or move it to ENY or Flatbush (why am I thinking FB, that's retarded) if it's a big enough demand for future route picks. With UP isn't almost seems political when it comes to buses they can handle. But they'll never lose the B6 which is financially understandable and obvious but who knows, I guess. I wouldn't be against the idea of B6 getting artics, no one would I would think, but it'll be a while before the surfaces a plan for a configuration/conversation, especially with the agency's financial track record. Who could possibly know at this rate? 1) It's not like a trying to announce when it will. 2) We acknowledge that it's not in the next CP, Thank you, Captain Obvious.... for the painfully reminder.
  2. I think it's safe to say that when the full installation and the actually OMNY card is revealed, it'll be truly feasible. I would think. Now? Not likely
  3. Sets that have been delivered and yet to be in service: 3288-3302. 3293-3302 in burn-in during most of this week. 3288-3292 maybe testing with another set.
  4. I like how these arguments just trails off the subject title in question. Bravo, guys lol. I simply think that the weekends don't really much demand unless it's a planned GO, obviously. Besides, that switch formation between Franklin Ave and Nostrand Ave don't need to be utilized if it's not peak hours; it'll just halt the trains unnecessarily when they can just go pass without waiting for a crossing train. It was always the that made it possible and I believe that was the brief reason why they cut it after 2010 regardless on finances but of course, brought it back for weekday demands. I think most of us know these reasons are obvious. No? Well.... ain't that something.
  5. "Here lies the raises and falls, raises and falls again with the in the 2010s" Cool pics btw
  6. But no. It's going by a particular, realistic schedule if there's no delays. There's no reason to truly rush to process. Kawasaki has done a good job so far based on their track record, I guess....
  7. Because Competition and diversity is a thing with bidding..... #1. You make it sound like it might be a bad thing. #2. Kawasaki is not the confirmed award winners for the 262s. If you're not aware, up to speed, these R62 replacements are under considerable planning and discussion. With that being said, nothing is said in stone yet. Patience, good sir....
  8. Gentlemen..... Please give me a fruitless, logical reasoning for why would CBTC hold any obligational demand on a route serving two stations only with it's own tunnels crossing midtown 1/2 mile......??? I'm looking at the track map of said tunnels and wondering WHY!?!?
  9. 3070-73 is still on property, it still counts as compilation of delivery. Dude wasn't referring to testing really.....
  10. 1. It's too early to tell for sure. 2. Suck it up or take a different route until the replacements arrive.
  11. Option #2 = 405 cars (81 five-cars sets) + 32 cars (8 four-car sets)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.