MTR Admiralty Posted July 22, 2009 Share #26 Posted July 22, 2009 The problems may have been fixed by the time the first 160 came in. Its hard to tell. one train on those tracks may not do anything, but what about ten 160 sets drawing power?? ever thought of that? Study engineering. learn some facts. thats what i did. IAWTP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Far Rock Depot Posted July 22, 2009 Share #27 Posted July 22, 2009 when the source comesfrom an employee, not just a T/O, C/R, T/S/S, but an engineer, and not just any engineer, the one i talked to about this was the one back during the designing of the 142s and is responsibe for the Alsthom "ONYX" propulsion. ill believe it. and another who drew up the concept for the 142s and 143s. I made a lot of use from my internship there. I dont just throw up random things. I bring facts. If its rumor, or my opinion, i state that. and if im proven wrong, i humblely admit it. one 160 may not continue the problems in the Rock, but who knows what can happen with a couple of them. remember, that line was originally LIRR. From Liberty JCT to the Hammels Wye was completly rebuilt by NYCT. The rest was converted for subway service with minimal reconstruction from old LIRR specs. Now as far as if it can handle NTTs now, That has yet to be shown to the public. We shall see in a few years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty Posted July 22, 2009 Share #28 Posted July 22, 2009 Plus we have to wait and see first if those cars are assigned there in the first place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Far Rock Depot Posted July 22, 2009 Share #29 Posted July 22, 2009 Plus we have to wait and see first if those cars are assigned there in the first place Exactly!!! Great point MTR! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lirim Posted July 22, 2009 Author Share #30 Posted July 22, 2009 didnt the r110s have break issues thats why the mta remove the r110 from the Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Far Rock Depot Posted July 22, 2009 Share #31 Posted July 22, 2009 it was removed from the because they(from what i was told) needed parts and scrapped 3 cars. it was then in service on the . There were many bugs with the train. It was a prototype NTT. systems intergration was improved with the procurment of the 142s and 143s and eventually the 160s Each car of the 110B estimated at around $3M per car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Far Rock Depot Posted July 23, 2009 Share #32 Posted July 23, 2009 Show me actual documents. Otherwise, I'm not convinced. where are yours??? documents of the power distribution are not made to the public and require employees to have a supervisor sign for the documents to leave the building. ask any TA employee who works in the office buildings and they will tell you that. You can blow all the hot air and claim you know better all you want. Im not arguing with someone who cant even go to a bar and drink yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Julio Posted July 23, 2009 Share #33 Posted July 23, 2009 Take this to PMs fellas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Far Rock Depot Posted July 23, 2009 Share #34 Posted July 23, 2009 You think I care? People don't need to go to a bar and have a good time. Besides, I'm straight-edge. it was a comment on your age. and you act like it. Thats all i have to say. My apologies to the Mods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRG Posted July 23, 2009 Share #35 Posted July 23, 2009 Okay, that's enough. Can a mod please close this thread to prevent this from escalating into a quarrel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.