NYCTNostalgia 49 #1 Posted August 9, 2009 Which route(s) would you give it to? In 1992 In 2001 during the Manhattan construction After 2004 2009 1992-(S)Franklin 2001-(S)Franklin(S)Rockaway Pk 2004-Same as 2001 2009-Same as 2001 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LRG 216 #2 Posted August 9, 2009 Which route(s) would you give it to? In 1992 In 2001 during the Manhattan construction After 2004 Well for one they cannot go onto the Eastern Division, even though the old BMT Els used 67' cars there were clearances placed on them that kept them barred. But if it were up to me I'd just keep them on the line where they were born on and the line that they basically died on, the and the . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NYCTNostalgia 49 #3 Posted August 9, 2009 Which Lines would you give it to? since they were in the 238 St Yard Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LRG 216 #4 Posted August 9, 2009 Which Lines would you give it to? I'd like to see how they would do on the (7)/<7>. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dustclee 0 #5 Posted August 9, 2009 I think this should be under the fantasy forum? But to answer the question, I think I'd give them to the because their NTT features (they do, right?) would help riders with the local/express confusion. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NYCTNostalgia 49 #6 Posted August 9, 2009 I agree. They also could of ran on the (S)42 Street Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trainfan22 1,729 #7 Posted August 9, 2009 The would get 50 cars while the would get the other half. :cool: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTR Admiralty 4 #8 Posted August 9, 2009 I'd like to see how they would do on the (7)/<7>. I think this should be under the fantasy forum?But to answer the question, I think I'd give them to the because their NTT features (they do, right?) would help riders with the local/express confusion. The R110As were built into 5 car sets. Had 100 of them been ordered, putting them on the will not maximise the line's full potential. The line accommodates 11 cars, putting trains with one less cars would mean more crowding on the 7. Not a good move. I agree. They also could of ran on the (S)42 Street Make sense, especially if they were built into single sets. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTR Admiralty 4 #9 Posted August 9, 2009 Train are built to 9 car sets. 3-3s. I'm not sure how a 3 car 67 foot train would work out on the Franklin shuttle being that the station lengths are substiantially shorter. Put them on the C, I'm sure riders would breathe a sigh of relief. They've been looking hungrily at the NTTs and want some of them for their commute. Hey, not everyone likes an older train. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trainfan22 1,729 #10 Posted August 9, 2009 The would have all 100 cars! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KeystoneRegional 246 #11 Posted August 9, 2009 Please, watch the Nazi Banksters Crimes Ripple Effect at http://jforjustice.co.uk/banksters Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KeystoneRegional 246 #12 Posted August 9, 2009 Please, watch the Nazi Banksters Crimes Ripple Effect at http://jforjustice.co.uk/banksters Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R44 5278 0 #13 Posted August 9, 2009 I wish that their seats would carry onto the R179 to increase versatility. But because overcrowding is such a tremendous problem on the QBL, I can see that the R179s are getting those light blue "back pain inducers" instead. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTR Admiralty 4 #14 Posted August 9, 2009 The R110B order cannot be a hundred cars. They could be 99 cars but not a 100. Remember, these guys could only form 9-car trains. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KeystoneRegional 246 #15 Posted August 10, 2009 Please, watch the Nazi Banksters Crimes Ripple Effect at http://jforjustice.co.uk/banksters Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R32 3348 10 #16 Posted August 10, 2009 The , requiring that they extend the platforms and straighten the ones at Times Sq. After that I'd say the should get them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R32 3348 10 #17 Posted August 10, 2009 , requiring platforms being lengthened The rest would go on the , bumping the R44/46s to the . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTR Admiralty 4 #18 Posted August 10, 2009 The , requiring that they extend the platforms and straighten the ones at Times Sq. After that I'd say the should get them. I'm very sure we are talking about Division B, Mr Datta Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blkfire765 0 #19 Posted August 11, 2009 R110 A division: on the -8 full 11 car trains running on express exclusively... would benefit express riders. on the - one 3 car set on the suttle R110 B division: All on the line with a rare on showing up on the line. * these R110's would get new FIND feature and features of an R160... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R110B 5 #20 Posted August 11, 2009 1991- 1999- same as 91 2001-same as 91 2009-same routes with addition to for less use during the day. that means each letter gets 33 cars. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites