Sea Beach Posted October 12, 2009 Share #1 Posted October 12, 2009 Went roaming around a little today and found some intresting stuff R68 Rollsigns Gone Wild Whats Wrong With This Pic? Skip-Stop R160 R68A Cab Whats wrong with this pic? New Turnstiles At 8 Ave (There used to be a metal gate here) At 36 St Kings Hwy Dont Ask Enjoy! - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel The Cool Posted October 12, 2009 Share #2 Posted October 12, 2009 lol lol lol nice photos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRG Posted October 12, 2009 Share #3 Posted October 12, 2009 WTH with the last shot? Lmao Great shots man. Another railfan also caught the same sign you did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metsfan Posted October 12, 2009 Share #4 Posted October 12, 2009 The and ( and church ave = What is wrong with the sign? I'm not down that way enough (brooklyn) to know what's normal and what's out of place really. Nice photos! - A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayBuffer Posted October 12, 2009 Share #5 Posted October 12, 2009 WTH with the last shot? LmaoGreat shots man. Another railfan also caught the same sign you did. It's probably the same train with the rollsigns stuck in those positions or for w/e reason haven't been corrected, similar to the case of the R-68 with a between cars which every so often someone "catches" and posts pics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayBuffer Posted October 12, 2009 Share #6 Posted October 12, 2009 What's wrong is the sign for the to 86 St. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sea Beach Posted October 12, 2009 Author Share #7 Posted October 12, 2009 lol lol lol nice photos Thanks! B) WTH with the last shot? LmaoGreat shots man. Another railfan also caught the same sign you did. LOL,I had to do that!! I couldnt help it! Thanks! yea,he was with me,lol. The and and church ave = What is wrong with the sign? I'm not down that way enough (brooklyn) to know what's normal and what's out of place really. Nice photos! - A hahahaha I have no clue,I guess a T/O messed them up? Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INDman Posted October 12, 2009 Share #8 Posted October 12, 2009 It's probably the same train with the rollsigns stuck in those positions or for w/e reason haven't been corrected, similar to the case of the R-68 with a between cars which every so often someone "catches" and posts pics. The sign is between two B cars so there is no reason to change it. Most of the R68/As have had signs on the B cars removed. I don't know how many times I have seen it and I think it's funny that when people see it, they think it's something special. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRG Posted October 12, 2009 Share #9 Posted October 12, 2009 It's probably the same train with the rollsigns stuck in those positions or for w/e reason haven't been corrected, similar to the case of the R-68 with a between cars which every so often someone "catches" and posts pics. I've seen this car. It is 2667, or 2666, not really sure which one. It's an original rollsign, so very few R68s have retained them. The only ones I know for a fact that have their original front rollsigns are the last 8 Coney Island R68s. The sign is between two B cars so there is no reason to change it. Most of the R68/As have had signs on the B cars removed. I don't know how many times I have seen it and I think it's funny that when people see it, they think it's something special. Maybe because they've never seen it before and because it's one of the few R68s that have their original rollsigns. 2660 also has its original rollsign. I saw it leading last week on the . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bveguy Posted October 12, 2009 Share #10 Posted October 12, 2009 I've seen this car. It is 2667, or 2666, not really sure which one. It's an original rollsign, so very few R68s have retained them. The only ones I know for a fact that have their original front rollsigns are the last 8 Coney Island R68s. I've seen car 2667 before, and the roll sign on that car now says . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRG Posted October 12, 2009 Share #11 Posted October 12, 2009 I've seen car 2667 before, and the roll sign on that car now says . It was most likely 2666 on the non-conductor end then that showed . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fresh Pond Posted October 13, 2009 Share #12 Posted October 13, 2009 Nice pics and LMFAO at that last one XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luis1985 Posted October 13, 2009 Share #13 Posted October 13, 2009 lol nice pics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sea Beach Posted October 13, 2009 Author Share #14 Posted October 13, 2009 Nice pics and LMFAO at that last one XD lol nice pics hahaha Thanks guys! and to laugh more,heres another: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KNIGHTRIDER3:16 Posted October 13, 2009 Share #15 Posted October 13, 2009 I like I like nice signage pics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark1447 Posted October 13, 2009 Share #16 Posted October 13, 2009 Nice Pics! Train is going Religous now lol! God Bless the ! The sign should be Coney Island not 86th St where the use to terminate! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PATCOman Posted October 13, 2009 Share #17 Posted October 13, 2009 Slammin pics! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sea Beach Posted October 14, 2009 Author Share #18 Posted October 14, 2009 I like I like nice signage pics Thanks Man! Nice Pics! Train is going Religous now lol! God Bless the ! Thanks Man! B) The sign should be Coney Island not 86th St where the use to terminate! Thanks Man! ROFLMFAO!! yup,thats correct! Slammin pics! Thanks Man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.