R44 5278 Posted November 16, 2009 Share #1 Posted November 16, 2009 Pg 36: http://mta.info/mta/news/books/pdf/091116_nyct.pdf The R44s and R142s had a massive improvement from 2007. As expected, the R143s and R160s performed the best in 2008. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattTrain Posted November 16, 2009 Share #2 Posted November 16, 2009 I'm not too suprised the R160A/B and R143s have a very high MBDF. That's a pretty good report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R32 3348 Posted November 16, 2009 Share #3 Posted November 16, 2009 For easy reference Link (Matt's is broken) - MTA NYCT Transit Committee Meeting 11/16/09, page 34 09/2008 – 12-Month Average MDBF (Most Reliable) R160 – 268,036 R68A - 229,486 R142 - 222,914 R143 – 207,600 R68 - 196,985 R142A - 136,106 R62 - 135,224 R40 - 134,104 R62A - 133,557 R46 - 109,731 R44 – 104,578 R38 – 92,959 R32 – 92,685 R42 – 83,726 (Least Reliable) 09/2009 – 12-Month Average MDBF (Most Reliable) R160 – 590,396 R142 - 232,025 R68A – 211,652 R143 – 206,186 R68 – 191,473 R62 – 137,790 R62A – 131,196 R142A – 129,236 R44 – 112,051 R46 – 87,175 R42 – 79,705 R32 – 54,191 (Least Reliable) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan Railer Posted November 17, 2009 Share #4 Posted November 17, 2009 lol some of the SMEE's beat the R142A's and the R143's, maybe it's the ADTRANZ propulsion...:confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R44 5278 Posted November 17, 2009 Author Share #5 Posted November 17, 2009 lol some of the SMEE's beat the R142A's and the R143's, maybe it's the ADTRANZ propulsion...:confused: Both Bombardier and Adtranz collaborated on that propulsion system design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.