2008 Roster MDBFs

[R44 5278 0]

Pg 36: http://mta.info/mta/news/books/pdf/091116_nyct.pdf

 

The R44s and R142s had a massive improvement from 2007. As expected, the R143s and R160s performed the best in 2008.

[MattTrain 3,120]

I'm not too suprised the R160A/B and R143s have a very high MBDF. That's a pretty good report.

[R32 3348 11]

For easy reference

 

 

Link (Matt's is broken) - MTA NYCT Transit Committee Meeting 11/16/09, page 34

 

09/2008 – 12-Month Average MDBF

(Most Reliable)

R160 – 268,036

R68A - 229,486

R142 - 222,914

R143 – 207,600

R68 - 196,985

R142A - 136,106

R62 - 135,224

R40 - 134,104

R62A - 133,557

R46 - 109,731

R44 – 104,578

R38 – 92,959

R32 – 92,685

R42 – 83,726

(Least Reliable)

 

09/2009 – 12-Month Average MDBF

(Most Reliable)

R160 – 590,396

R142 - 232,025

R68A – 211,652

R143 – 206,186

R68 – 191,473

R62 – 137,790

R62A – 131,196

R142A – 129,236

R44 – 112,051

R46 – 87,175

R42 – 79,705

R32 – 54,191

(Least Reliable)

[Fan Railer 1,580]

lol some of the SMEE's beat the R142A's and the R143's, maybe it's the ADTRANZ propulsion...:confused:

[R44 5278 0]

lol some of the SMEE's beat the R142A's and the R143's, maybe it's the ADTRANZ propulsion...:confused:

 

Both Bombardier and Adtranz collaborated on that propulsion system design.