E Local Posted December 6, 2009 #1 Posted December 6, 2009 this is a subway map that i created: it has extensions of the & trains this is a fake map obviously this is the map i got inspiration from, but its not it:mad:
R32 3348 Posted December 6, 2009 #2 Posted December 6, 2009 Welcome to the boards! The reason the picture isn't showing is because you don't have it on an image hosting site. Sign up at an image hosting site like Photobucket, ImageShack or Flickr and upload the file. Then they will give you an IMG code to paste into your post to show the image.
EE Broadway Local Posted December 9, 2009 #3 Posted December 9, 2009 Welcome aboard! You've extended the and lines?
via White Plains Road Posted December 10, 2009 #4 Posted December 10, 2009 Welcome to New York City Transit Forums.....pls enjoy your stay on here!
Luis1985 Posted December 10, 2009 #5 Posted December 10, 2009 hey, welcome to NYCT Forums, u mind if i see ur map please?
E Local Posted January 21, 2010 Author #6 Posted January 21, 2010 hey, welcome to NYCT Forums, u mind if i see ur map please? thanks but i didn't post it yet because i "don't have a flick R" (U)!
E Local Posted January 21, 2010 Author #7 Posted January 21, 2010 http://www.flickr.com/photos/subways/4291402401/ i hope the map shows, but if it does, it shows the extensions of the , & (7)/<7> trains. I used the 1999 subway map & created it into this!, you could tell because of the (Q6) running to eastern queens. there is no service, i will create the track maps soon.
Grand Concourse Posted January 21, 2010 #8 Posted January 21, 2010 Unless those N/W lines are on a separate level from the 6, there is no way they can share the same tracks as the N/W trains are wider than the platforms for the 6.
E Local Posted January 21, 2010 Author #9 Posted January 21, 2010 Unless those N/W lines are on a separate level from the 6, there is no way they can share the same tracks as the N/W trains are wider than the platforms for the 6. no, the trains are at deeper level from the (6)/<6>, & i cant do that because then i will have to close that portion of the pelham stations to rebuild the platforms & tracks, that could waste money & it could take a long time, & south pelham riders would angry!
E Local Posted January 21, 2010 Author #10 Posted January 21, 2010 Welcome aboard! You've extended the and lines? yes, the to the Bronx (242 street), the to lefferts BLVD then to 125 street in queens, so now it's the second line that has 2 stations with the same name, like the , & the to 251 street, more up in the Bronx to get faster service to westchester county.
E Local Posted January 21, 2010 Author #11 Posted January 21, 2010 hey guys if you see this map, you will know i made a few extensions: - extended to 242 street in the Bronx - extended first to lefferts BLVD in queens, then to 125 street in queens (E)/(J)/(Z)/(Q6)- all extended to 177 street in queens - extended to E 242 street in the Bronx via Bronx BLVD - extended to 188 street in eastern queens - extended to 18 avenue in Brooklyn all times via local - extended to 23 street in Manhattan via 9th avenue (N)/(W)- both extended to E 174 street in the Bronx - extended south to 100 street in Brooklyn & in queens extended to Jamaica-179 street via local - extended to 251 street, more up in the Bronx - extended to avenue J in Brooklyn - extended west to 8th avenue (wow 1 stop to the left)! - extended/ replacing trains to new lots avenue all times - extended to Atlantic avenue, Brooklyn/ weekdays (7)/<7>- both extended south to 23 street via 9th avenue in Manhattan & in queens extended to 155 street, eastern queens
NX Express Posted January 21, 2010 #12 Posted January 21, 2010 yes, the to the Bronx (242 street), the to lefferts BLVD then to 125 street in queens, so now it's the second line that has 2 stations with the same name, like the , & the to 251 street, more up in the Bronx to get faster service to westchester county. You mean third line ( 36 Street and ( 7 Av). BTW, nice map!
E Local Posted January 22, 2010 Author #13 Posted January 22, 2010 You mean third line ( 36 Street and 7 Av).BTW, nice map! I know what you mean, but in my map the does not go on the Brighton line, the (Q6) replaces the because there are 2 (Q6)/(Q) trains & i didn't want both of them going on the same line, so thanks for the compliment, im glad you like my map, i like yours too!
NX Express Posted January 22, 2010 #14 Posted January 22, 2010 I know what you mean, but in my map the does not go on the Brighton line, the (Q6) replaces the because there are 2 (Q6)/(Q) trains & i didn't want both of them going on the same line, so thanks for the compliment, im glad you like my map, i like yours too! But both still run over the Manny B. I suggest you rename the (Q6) the .
E Local Posted January 22, 2010 Author #15 Posted January 22, 2010 But both still run over the Manny B.I suggest you rename the (Q6) the . why?, sorry i dont want to because im too lazy! (O)!
E Local Posted January 22, 2010 Author #16 Posted January 22, 2010 http://www.flickr.com/photos/subways/4295701433/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/subways/4295701413/ these are the 2 tracks maps i uploaded, for now
dustclee Posted January 23, 2010 #17 Posted January 23, 2010 Nice map, but I can tell you Sea Beach definitely doesn't need another service, as much as I'd love it. Also, I have a few questions: Where does the (Q6) switch onto the bridge tracks? Does the run local in Brooklyn now? Since the would be in the way if it terminates at Atlantic...
E Local Posted January 23, 2010 Author #18 Posted January 23, 2010 Nice map, but I can tell you Sea Beach definitely doesn't need another service, as much as I'd love it.Also, I have a few questions: Where does the (Q6) switch onto the bridge tracks? Does the run local in Brooklyn now? Since the would be in the way if it terminates at Atlantic... *the (Q6) switches to the express for the bridge tracks before hitting W 4 street, thats why it runs via 53rd street with the . *the runs local in Brooklyn because the runs express & terminates at crown heights-utica avenue *the only terminates at Atlantic avenue till 8:45, like in real life.
E Local Posted January 23, 2010 Author #19 Posted January 23, 2010 http://www.flickr.com/photos/subways/4298073844/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/subways/4297329263/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/subways/4298073752/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/subways/4298073718/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/subways/4297329173/ these are the 5 track maps i finished
E Local Posted January 23, 2010 Author #20 Posted January 23, 2010 http://www.flickr.com/photos/subways/4298178864/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/subways/4298178832/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/subways/4298178774/ these are 3 more i made
T to Dyre Avenue Posted January 23, 2010 #21 Posted January 23, 2010 Excellent job on your maps, especially the track maps. But I think the two separate Q trains are confusing and the orange Q should get a different letter. It would be especially confusing for passengers at Herald Square, DeKalb and Atlantic where both Q's stop. Also, the only way you could have the running express and the terminating at Atlantic full-time would be to completely rebuilt the IRT Eastern Parkway line with flyover junctions south of Atlantic for the and to cross each other and pocket tracks for the to relay on.
Kingsbridge Bus Posted January 23, 2010 #22 Posted January 23, 2010 Excellent job on your maps, especially the track maps. But I think the two separate Q trains are confusing and the orange Q should get a different letter. It would be especially confusing for passengers at Herald Square, DeKalb and Atlantic where both Q's stop. Also, the only way you could have the running express and the terminating at Atlantic full-time would be to completely rebuilt the IRT Eastern Parkway line with flyover junctions south of Atlantic for the and to cross each other and pocket tracks for the to relay on. Back in the 80's there used to be a yellow (& along with the original
T to Dyre Avenue Posted January 24, 2010 #23 Posted January 24, 2010 I know. I took both. But that was because they had to split the B and D trains because the north side Manhattan Bridge tracks were shut down from 1986-88. But you wouldn't want to have two B and two D services on separate trunk lines today with all four bridge tracks in service. From 2001 to 2004, the north side tracks were closed a second time and the called the Brooklyn B and D services and . Their reason: To minimize confusion.
E Local Posted January 26, 2010 Author #24 Posted January 26, 2010 http://www.flickr.com/photos/subways/4304622361/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/subways/4300921670/ my own tracks maps, the eastern queens extensions (, , (J)/(Z), & (Q6))
E Local Posted January 26, 2010 Author #25 Posted January 26, 2010 this is a new map, it's the same of everything but now the is running local, with the new track maps: http://www.flickr.com/photos/subways/4305604430/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/subways/4304862103/sizes/l/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/subways/4304862075/sizes/l/ also in the Brooklyn 2 track map, just look closely after Franklin avenue & there are some switches for trains to run express & terminate at crown heights, so the & need to share the local stops all times but nights!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.