Shortline Bus Posted December 8, 2009 Share #1 Posted December 8, 2009 Straphangers could see service cuts next year after all because the state apparently miscalculated how much money the payroll tax would generate for the MTA, officials said Monday. The tax revenue appears to be 20% below what the state forecast for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority -- $200 million less than what the agency based its financial plans on, MTA Chief Financial Officer Garry Dellaverson told authority board members. "This is a shocking development both because of the magnitude of the under-run and the late date of its discovery," Dellaverson wrote. Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2009/12/07/2009-12-07_strahangers_face_service_cuts_as_state_makes.html#ixzz0Z6RmN7Xa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R10 2952 Posted December 8, 2009 Share #2 Posted December 8, 2009 All I can say is that this story shouldn't be taken seriously until it starts hitting other headlines. However, after being continously screwed over for 2 years, I don't think that riders would be willing to tolerate such an outrage. Besides, who knows? As dysfunctional as our government and transit system may be, a solution might be found, if such a problem arises. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbanfortitude Posted December 8, 2009 Share #3 Posted December 8, 2009 We've heard this song before. We'll hear it again for years to come. Wait and see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R32 3348 Posted December 8, 2009 Share #4 Posted December 8, 2009 I agree. Lets' not start jumping to conclusions yet. Remember that for the past few years, the threat of fare hikes and service cuts have been nearly inherent. This article is just capitalizing on what we already know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S78 via Hylan Posted December 8, 2009 Share #5 Posted December 8, 2009 I'm with you on that. We don't know anything much yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R44 5278 Posted December 8, 2009 Share #6 Posted December 8, 2009 I bet that they will still install those security cameras in each train. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LexAveExp5 Posted December 8, 2009 Share #7 Posted December 8, 2009 they spend so much money on these construction projects. but then they tell us that it's 2 different budgets so you cant use that money for USEFUL stuff like preventing service cuts and fare hikes and paying their workers!!! Albany, change the law so you can use the money and stop trying to make the 7 line a tad longer and sending the LIRR to the east side!!! :mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nel070 Posted December 11, 2009 Share #8 Posted December 11, 2009 the problem is the mta needs a steady stream of revunue aside from fairs they collect since the state and city keep trimming the money they are giving them and this payroll tax was supposed to do this and hasnt maybe they can have a lottery in the state that can benefit the mta Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shortline Bus Posted December 11, 2009 Author Share #9 Posted December 11, 2009 they spend so much money on these construction projects. but then they tell us that it's 2 different budgets so you cant use that money for USEFUL stuff like preventing service cuts and fare hikes and paying their workers!!! Albany, change the law so you can use the money and stop trying to make the 7 line a tad longer and sending the LIRR to the east side!!! :mad: i am not sure how often you use the lirr but penn station is overcrowded. the (MTA)is right in buliding the esa to grand central. however i agree w/ lex ave express that the (7)extension to the javits center area is not an urgent matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SubwayGuy Posted December 11, 2009 Share #10 Posted December 11, 2009 i am not sure how often you use the lirr but penn station is overcrowded. the (MTA)is right in buliding the esa to grand central. however i agree w/ lex ave express that the (7)extension to the javits center area is not an urgent matter. East Side Access is a gigantic waste of money. Right now, MTA makes fares from people who are too lazy to walk across town in the form of fares, who want to come in closer to GCT but come in instead at Penn. Doing this will cost them that fare money going forward. Also, Grand Central is very much crowded as it is, and where do you think the folks riding the LIRR are going to go when they get off the train? Why, right onto the already overcrowded Lexington Avenue ...not the or , since if they were headed west, Penn Station would be closer. The ONLY projects worth doing right now are upgrading infrastructure, and the Second Avenue Subway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbanfortitude Posted December 11, 2009 Share #11 Posted December 11, 2009 Penn Station can handle the crowding. The west side has like 3 avenue subway lines for all that to dump onto. The only thing the east side has is the Lex Ave lines and a bunch of buses. I do agree with SubwayGuy that the 2nd Ave Subway needs to be built. And it needs to be built badly. I really doubt the MTA will actually cut service. This is the same song they sang last time around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metsfan Posted December 11, 2009 Share #12 Posted December 11, 2009 Headline should read: "Incompetence gives straphangers surprise headache." I'm telling you, the has had it's run, it needs to be divided up if things are to progress to anything positive from the mess we are in currently. (NYCT): Bus, BRT, Subway. NYRRR: LIRR and MNRR. Could operate light rail as well. NYRB: Regional Bus routes, anything going outside of the 5 boroughs on tires with a driver. Trying to fit that many operations, routes, vehicles, stops, stations etc under one administrative roof is why there is so many issues. You can't not upgrade an interlocking, then axe a station upgrade in the subway because the funding is in conflict.... - A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.