Jump to content
Attention: In order to reply to messages, create topics, have access to other features of the community you must sign up for an account.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

BMT4Life

R179 Discussion Thread

Recommended Posts

I seen something about the R179 as only being a rumor. I thought we could keep a thread on the rumors.

 

I would like to know all the latest rumors about the R179. B)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The latest rumors about the R179 is that they will kill off the R44.Another rumor is that they kill off both the R44 and R46 and even the R68/A.And another rumor is that the r179 will kill off the MK R42s R32s the R40Ms and the R44s.And another rumor is that it will be a 75ft R160

 

 

But personally i think that the R179 will kill off the R44,R32,40M and the R46.Leaving the R68/A as the only non NTT fleet left in the B div.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So is the name of the car (R179) a rumor also or is it in fact the name of it?

 

Only the MTA knows the train could be in planning/drawing stages....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this "R 179" whatever it is, it does not need to kill off the R32.

 

kill off the 44/46's, i don't care (i would actually be happy if it killed off the 46's but anyway) the R32's are in Excellent condition and they would last for another 60 years if properly maintained

 

but then again it would be pretty weird if they killed off all the older trains except for the R32, you'd have the R32 from the 60's compared with other trains from the 80's and recently, and it would be just so different lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard they are gonna be placed on the SIR and will feature LED Destinations sign just like the R-32's (pre 1990 goh). Another rumor states all R-179's were to be 67 footers insted of 75. But I don't know and honestly, more 75 footers are very unnecessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You really need to lighten up kid. B)
Uh, No. The R179 is just a rumor. It was overheard by two transit employees BSing about what the next train is going to be. There is no plan or blue prints in place for this so called R179 which is why I call BS on this R179 theory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Uh, No. The R179 is just a rumor. It was overheard by two transit employees BSing about what the next train is going to be. There is no plan or blue prints in place for this so called R179 which is why I call BS on this R179 theory.

 

Ok thank you. That's is what you should have posted to begin with instead of posting BS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok The R179 there is truth to it. Right now its my understanding its still on the drawing board which will be a 75FT version of the R 160. It is intended at this time to replace the R44/46 fleet only. I got my information from a Supt. I tought they were not going to have another 75 car but who knows that can change.

Also when ever they do make it in service the plan right now is to send them directly to Queens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres another rumor that theres is an R162 subway car.Which will have CBTC and run on the A div (7) line.And that the side will look like an R142.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok The R179 there is truth to it. Right now its my understanding its still on the drawing board which will be a 75FT version of the R 160. It is intended at this time to replace the R44/46 fleet only. I got my information from a Supt. I tought they were not going to have another 75 car but who knows that can change.

Also when ever they do make it in service the plan right now is to send them directly to Queens.

 

Maybe it will be 67ft like the R110B.Since they already have C/R boards for 67ft trains could be posslble.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had heard that the MTA was going to stop ordering 75 ft cars. I could be wrong though. Although, it would be nice to face forward and be able to look out the window on the (E).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the best thing as of right now is to keep discussing rumors, but not to let them go to anyone's head to avoid unnecessary conversations or flame wars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok The R179 there is truth to it. Right now its my understanding its still on the drawing board which will be a 75FT version of the R 160. It is intended at this time to replace the R44/46 fleet only. I got my information from a Supt. I tought they were not going to have another 75 car but who knows that can change.

Also when ever they do make it in service the plan right now is to send them directly to Queens.

Well I hope they don't because those R46s are the best 75 footers we got. Those cabs are sleepers man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok The R179 there is truth to it. Right now its my understanding its still on the drawing board which will be a 75FT version of the R 160. It is intended at this time to replace the R44/46 fleet only. I got my information from a Supt. I tought they were not going to have another 75 car but who knows that can change.

Also when ever they do make it in service the plan right now is to send them directly to Queens.

GOOD!

 

they should not make it a 75 foot car since a 10-car 60 foot train kinda looks longer than a 8-car 75 foot train

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Uh, No. The R179 is just a rumor. It was overheard by two transit employees BSing about what the next train is going to be. There is no plan or blue prints in place for this so called R179 which is why I call BS on this R179 theory.

 

 

The R179 is in its planning stages its not a "rumor" overheard by Two Tranist Employees BS'ing..

 

I got my info from a Supt where did you get yours from?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GOOD!

 

they should not make it a 75 foot car since a 10-car 60 foot train kinda looks longer than a 8-car 75 foot train

But an 8 car train of 75 footers can hold more than a 10 car train of 60 footers. Also, two less cars you have to order for every full 600 ft. train.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok The R179 there is truth to it. Right now its my understanding its still on the drawing board which will be a 75FT version of the R 160. It is intended at this time to replace the R44/46 fleet only. I got my information from a Supt. I tought they were not going to have another 75 car but who knows that can change.

Also when ever they do make it in service the plan right now is to send them directly to Queens.

 

Also remember Dave those R179's are supposed to go to the Staten Island Railway as well to replace those cars.

 

Its going to take a minute but they are coming like it or leave it..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Also rememebr Dave thsoe R179's are supposed to go to the Staten Island Railway as well to replace those cars.

 

Its going to take a minute but they are coming like it or leave it..

So we can scratch out modified M8s or possible M9s for SIR.....B)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the R46 needs replaced by the R179.Over the past couple of weeks the R46s have been becoming crap. Making weird noises.The floor starts vibating when the train is braking.And just when the train stops trucks jerk vioently.Jamaica is just not keeping up with them anymore.Or age is just catching up to them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But an 8 car train of 75 footers can hold more than a 10 car train of 60 footers. Also, two less cars you have to order for every full 600 ft. train.

 

Yep, cause you eliminate the space between cars from being space, and becoming room for customers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.