Fresh Pond 5,371 Posted May 12, 2010 Share #1 Posted May 12, 2010 If you wasn't aware of it, a Manhattan-bound train was crossing the Myrtle Av junction and went BIE. That in turn blocked all trains behind it, and all (M2) trains from entering and leaving Myrtle-Bway. From what I heard on the radio, it cleared and the next car went BIE and was stalled even longer. All (M2) trains were held in the nearest station. I was stuck at Metropolitan Av (my 23:35 train didn't move until 0:28 smh). The question is, do you think anything can be done about that junction? If you don't know about it, the (M2) crosses in front of the at track level. I had the idea of some sort of flying junction. What do you think? **FYI, there is to talk of the (M)/(V) or R32 here so take that somewhere else** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NX Express 292 Posted May 12, 2010 Share #2 Posted May 12, 2010 They could do the following: s-bound (M2) trains run normal n-bound (M2) trains diverge after Flushing Av, then run to and stop at Myrtle upper, then continue via regular route. However, the (NYCT) has no cash, so that's not happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe 781 Posted May 12, 2010 Share #3 Posted May 12, 2010 They could do the following:s-bound (M2) trains run normal n-bound (M2) trains diverge after Flushing Av, then run to and stop at Myrtle upper, then continue via regular route. However, the (NYCT) has no cash, so that's not happening. It didn't happen in the years between then and now either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamen Rider 2,877 Posted May 12, 2010 Share #4 Posted May 12, 2010 Please, watch the Nazi Banksters Crimes Ripple Effect at http://jforjustice.co.uk/banksters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fresh Pond 5,371 Posted May 12, 2010 Author Share #5 Posted May 12, 2010 I was thinking that they can move the station a block back towards Flushing (like around Stockholm St) and use the upper level in some sort of flying junction. Before anybody says anything, that wasn't the original location of Myrtle Av. The original station was actually on Stuyvesant Av but they moved it back to build that junction with the (M2). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty 4 Posted May 12, 2010 Share #6 Posted May 12, 2010 The real issue is that the (M2) has to take on a right of way between Troutman and Ditmars Streets onto the Myrtle Line, and this goes right back to almost a century ago. Thus, it is almost forced to take on a level junction because of the placements of the station and the branch off. So basically, this set up is totally archaic. With money, I would seriously rebuild that area. My recommendation is, before Myrtle Avenue, have the Myrtle Avenue line drop down on Lewis Avenue from Broadway. This portion of Broadway could allow for potential widening of the el structure, because you have the projects on that side. The buildings are placed away from Broadway and Lewis, such to have this move feasible. A flying junction would allow tracks to curve above the main tracks and onto Lewis Avenue. From Lewis, it would turn right onto Myrtle. There is an existing section of el structure without trackbeds at this point, IINM. From there, trains can use the upper level and then continue. A junction can be built immediately east of Flushing Ave. There are potential problems to this set up as people (during PM rush, say) between Hewes-Flushing bound for Jamaica have to take a Myrtle train that would stop on the upper level of the next station, and that they are forced to go downstairs to the main line. If, however, my planned set up streamlines service, some trips can run local and still continue on to Jamaica during rush hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe 781 Posted May 12, 2010 Share #7 Posted May 12, 2010 Unless the current El structure falls down or is destroyed by NYCHA forces, there's little point in all this talk of flying junctions, walking junctions, swimming junctions and what-have-you. It's fine the way it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EE Broadway Local 18 Posted May 13, 2010 Share #8 Posted May 13, 2010 To add: Myrtle Avenue Upper would have to have new trackways, tracks and signals installed and be strengthened. The station held nothing heavier than a Q Car until it closed on October 4, 1969. Not to mention, the station would likely need a little cleaning and TLC after forty years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamaica Express 27 Posted May 13, 2010 Share #9 Posted May 13, 2010 The Upper Level of the Myrtle Ave station is completely unusable...its just trackways with a storage house taking up the entire platform, thats it. Its connection to the rest of the line was severed. It would have to take a complete rebuild to make it usable by trains again...which is not worth the money . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty 4 Posted May 13, 2010 Share #10 Posted May 13, 2010 To add: Myrtle Avenue Upper would have to have new trackways, tracks and signals installed and be strengthened. The station held nothing heavier than a Q Car until it closed on October 4, 1969. Not to mention, the station would likely need a little cleaning and TLC after forty years. The Upper Level of the Myrtle Ave station is completely unusable...its just trackways with a storage house taking up the entire platform, thats it. Its connection to the rest of the line was severed. It would have to take a complete rebuild to make it usable by trains again...which is not worth the money . Hey I'm just placing in an idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRG 217 Posted May 13, 2010 Share #11 Posted May 13, 2010 IMO, just tear down the Myrtle Avenue El and call it a day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty 4 Posted May 13, 2010 Share #12 Posted May 13, 2010 IMO, just tear down the Myrtle Avenue El and call it a day. I believe one of the Second System lines was meant to replace a portion of the Broadway el, IINM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeystoneRegional 246 Posted May 14, 2010 Share #13 Posted May 14, 2010 Please, watch the Nazi Banksters Crimes Ripple Effect at http://jforjustice.co.uk/banksters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty 4 Posted May 14, 2010 Share #14 Posted May 14, 2010 If they could they should use 111th St - Mets - Willets Point area track config as a model, or use Queensboro Plaza as a model, these are two of the most efficient configs, but I can see service disruptions and the probably terminating at Marcy Ave. and another connection service terminating at Broadway Junction. As well as plenty of Shuttle Busses running for about 2-3 years. A tough job but more faster service, your choice... Queensboro Plaza-like stuff will look like an immense nightmare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rutgers Tube 0 Posted May 14, 2010 Share #15 Posted May 14, 2010 Myrtle Avenue ranked 168 out of 422, according 2009 figures. If every station (complexes such as Grand Central-42nd Street being three stations, Bryant Park being two, etc.) had just one S/A laid off, Myrtle Avenue-Broadway would be one of the last ones to get hit. Not to disrespect the regular station patrons, but... Who cares? The needs to worry about fixing their finances and establish their own priorities before they try to fix minor and infrequent issues that don't really impact everyone at costs that dwarf the largest Powerball jackpots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m7zanr160s 246 Posted May 14, 2010 Share #16 Posted May 14, 2010 I say just make the (M2) a permanent Myrtle Ave line and bring back the upper level. Then have the run local at all times and the a fully express route at rush, even skipping stops between Junction and Myrtle. And have the start at Broadway Junction, eliminating skip-stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NX Express 292 Posted May 14, 2010 Share #17 Posted May 14, 2010 I say just make the (M2) a permanent Myrtle Ave line and bring back the upper level. Then have the run local at all times and the a fully express route at rush, even skipping stops between Junction and Myrtle. And have the start at Broadway Junction, eliminating skip-stop. If that were to happen, you would want the to start at Jamaica Center and the to start at B'way Junction. Expresses usually start farther out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EE Broadway Local 18 Posted May 14, 2010 Share #18 Posted May 14, 2010 If that were to happen, you would want the to start at Jamaica Center and the to start at B'way Junction. Expresses usually start farther out. No, the running local 24/7 would have to start/end at Jamaica Center; The running express full rush hours could start/end at "Broadway Junction" if not at Jamaica Center. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NX Express 292 Posted May 15, 2010 Share #19 Posted May 15, 2010 No, the running local 24/7 would have to start/end at Jamaica Center; The running express full rush hours could start/end at "Broadway Junction" if not at Jamaica Center. Can't the run to JAM when the is not running and go to B'way Junction when the is running? That'd work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty 4 Posted May 15, 2010 Share #20 Posted May 15, 2010 Can't the run to JAM when the is not running and go to B'way Junction when the is running? That'd work. And have the run express from B'way Jct to Marcy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NX Express 292 Posted May 15, 2010 Share #21 Posted May 15, 2010 And have the run express from B'way Jct to Marcy? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty 4 Posted May 15, 2010 Share #22 Posted May 15, 2010 Yes. Judging from a track map, the would have to cross in front of the at B'way Jct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NX Express 292 Posted May 15, 2010 Share #23 Posted May 15, 2010 Judging from a track map, the would have to cross in front of the at B'way Jct. Either that, or the could somehow relay in ENY Yard.:confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty 4 Posted May 15, 2010 Share #24 Posted May 15, 2010 Either that, or the could somehow relay in ENY Yard.:confused: I'll leave everything as it is for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeystoneRegional 246 Posted May 15, 2010 Share #25 Posted May 15, 2010 Please, watch the Nazi Banksters Crimes Ripple Effect at http://jforjustice.co.uk/banksters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.