LexAveExp5 Posted June 15, 2010 Share #1 Posted June 15, 2010 this is just hilarious http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37697867 nobody from the ever heard of FML? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7LineFan Posted June 15, 2010 Share #2 Posted June 15, 2010 Somebody put a picture of that up here. I forget which thread it's in... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark1447 Posted June 15, 2010 Share #3 Posted June 15, 2010 A bunch. http://www.nyctransitforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20892 http://www.nyctransitforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20898 But its funny it made it in the news xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregorygrice Posted June 15, 2010 Share #4 Posted June 15, 2010 Yeah the news is kinda late, but yes its funny. But now they said they are gonna put the under the and Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Louis Car 09 Posted June 15, 2010 Share #5 Posted June 15, 2010 Quite embarassing on the part.yes? Goes to show the isn`t down wit today`s text messaging slang... MTA-My ta-tas ache. -Always carry Eats -Every Fool Must Read -Another shlep (M2) Lazy Mother------ -Forgot Grandma -Another call girl (M2) Just Making Zebra wings. -Look mommy I can count. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty Posted June 15, 2010 Share #6 Posted June 15, 2010 Okay.. first time it's news, second time it's ok, third time... come on man, doesn't it get old? Just being honest and blunt. No harm intended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buswizard Posted June 15, 2010 Share #7 Posted June 15, 2010 Okay perhaps it should be rearranged! lol. instead of: OH NO I MISSED MY TRAIN!! (M2) change to: OH I THOUGHT THAT WAS FUNNY! (M2)(F)AO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LexAveExp5 Posted June 15, 2010 Author Share #8 Posted June 15, 2010 Okay.. first time it's news, second time it's ok, third time... come on man, doesn't it get old? Just being honest and blunt. No harm intended. yeah but the first 2 were in the photos section. who the hell looks at the photos section on a daily basis? oh, right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NX Express Posted June 15, 2010 Share #9 Posted June 15, 2010 (F)orever (M)ore (L)ines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty Posted June 15, 2010 Share #10 Posted June 15, 2010 yeah but the first 2 were in the photos section. who the hell looks at the photos section on a daily basis? oh, right Check unread posts section. There is a feature that when you create new threads it shows if there are similar threads. Check that instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LexAveExp5 Posted June 16, 2010 Author Share #11 Posted June 16, 2010 once i typed the title into the box, 1 "similar" thread appeared but it wasnt any of the ones you guys mentioned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cait Sith Posted June 16, 2010 Share #12 Posted June 16, 2010 Yeah the news is kinda late, but yes its funny. But now they said they are gonna put the under the and (L)azy (F)ucking (M)orons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SubwayGuy Posted June 16, 2010 Share #13 Posted June 16, 2010 Not as bad as the genius that suggested that the Second Avenue Subway (you know when fully built, all four phases in the year 2775) run a regular service pattern in addition to the . This new service would be called the (U) and according to this person, should run with a south terminal of Hanover Square, then go north, diverge after 55th Street station into the 63rd tunnel (since this track connection is built into the current Phase III plan for SAS), and go to Queens.... ....where it would proceed to go all the way to 179 St. making this station entrance sign possible: Got a few laughs when I posted that picture at Subchat too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.