Jump to content

Any chance of the G getting full length trains?


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 198
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Now that the (V) is gone and theres extra R46s to go round, is there any chance the (G) will go back to 8 car trains?

The so called extra R46's form the V went to the A so the R44's can be retired. You would know this if you monitored this board.

 

I "love" how some of you guys like to spend MTA's money! Aren't you aware that there is a budget crisis? Are you aware that doubling the G's length costs money since more cars are required?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The so called extra R46's form the V went to the A so the R44's can be retired. You would know this if you monitored this board.

 

I "love" how some of you guys like to spend MTA's money! Aren't you aware that there is a budget crisis? Are you aware that doubling the G's length costs money since more cars are required?

 

whats with the attitude? excuse me for not doing the exact calculations of what trains are going where B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about you wait where you know the train will stop.

 

If you're at a stop like Clinton-Washington where the entrances are at the ends of the platform, you find yourself doing a sprint to catch the last car (or first car) of the train.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The (G) had a better chance of this when it was running on QB. No chance of it getting full length cars now. Besides, why would you want the (G) to be full length? There's far more deserving lines of the consist and I get a kick out of watching people sprint for the train.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did the IND even bother building full-length stations on the (G)? I don't think the (G) has ever been full-length in its entire history (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong). But seriously, the (G) cannot go on using half-length trains forever. One day, it will have to make that evolutionary leap to 600 feet...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did the IND even bother building full-length stations on the (G)? I don't think the (G) has ever been full-length in its entire history (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong). But seriously, the (G) cannot go on using half-length trains forever. One day, it will have to make that evolutionary leap to 600 feet...

 

Was full length back in the early 90s and late 80s. I recall riding a full length R32 (G) train.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whats with the attitude? excuse me for not doing the exact calculations of what trains are going where B)

 

It's called reality B)

Plus it's pretty much everywhere that the R44s are going and the R46s have come to help cover for the gap left by more R44 retirements. All that can be hoped is when the last R44 goes, there won't be a car shortage.

Why did the IND even bother building full-length stations on the (G)? I don't think the (G) has ever been full-length in its entire history (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong). But seriously, the (G) cannot go on using half-length trains forever. One day, it will have to make that evolutionary leap to 600 feet...

 

For GOs to Coney Island, the (G) runs 600' trains.

Was full length back in the early 90s and late 80s. I recall riding a full length R32 (G) train.

 

When the (G) had 6-car R46s, I think they had 8-car R32s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did the IND even bother building full-length stations on the (G)? I don't think the (G) has ever been full-length in its entire history (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong). But seriously, the (G) cannot go on using half-length trains forever. One day, it will have to make that evolutionary leap to 600 feet...

 

they were very forward thinking in those days I guess

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.