Jump to content

R160 signed up as a (C) spotted...


NX Express

Recommended Posts


I think it doesn't mean a damn thing...

 

Exactly. TA crew mess with the route signage when the trains are laid up in the yard to appease to the railfans. Last September I saw a 160 signed as (A).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wirelessly posted via (Mozilla/5.0 (Danger hiptop 4.6; U; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050920)

 

It happens alot, mainly to get railfans 3rd rails electrified. Its nothing new and its just harmless fun. At ENY they do it all the time...I've seen (A)(C)(D)(Q)(V) and even (3) (on an R32)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now if you saw a R160 at Euclid saying (C) then maybe it would be more weird explanation (Like that R142A at Euclid. Talk about odd.) But it was just a T/O or C/R messing. Btw, as I pass the yard on the Belt the other day I saw R160 (T) train. Yes I said (T). Did I run here and wail about it? Simply, no because I know someone just had fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does it matter that a not-in-service train is signed up as any route? (A)(;)(C)...yeah it's there, but it's not in service. This is no reason to be so hyped up over. It means absolutely nothing because it's not in passenger service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...in Coney Island Yard yesterday around 10 PM. What do you think? (Please, no foaming)

 

i sware i have a school there at bay pkwy (N) which i take to c.i (D)(F)(N)(Q) transfer to (Q) to sheepshead bay i saw it too 3 days ago it was the(A) to 168 street

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.