MattTrain Posted November 6, 2010 Share #1 Posted November 6, 2010 I have some photos of what looks like a concrete surface replacing wood in the boardwalk. Location is around Ocean Parkway and Brighton 1 Street. Here is the new surface The differences between the types of surfaces. The wood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Concourse Posted November 6, 2010 Share #2 Posted November 6, 2010 Great shots! Obviously takes away from the 'beach experience', but better that than rotting wood planks. I'll take these over rotting wood anyday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SubwayGuy Posted November 6, 2010 Share #3 Posted November 6, 2010 That looks hideous. Developers ruin everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CenSin Posted November 6, 2010 Share #4 Posted November 6, 2010 Great shots!Obviously takes away from the 'beach experience', but better that than rotting wood planks. I'll take these over rotting wood anyday. I jog/run on these for exercise. I've tripped on these before and the splinters hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metsfan Posted November 6, 2010 Share #5 Posted November 6, 2010 I jog/run on these for exercise. I've tripped on these before and the splinters hurt. The nails can stick up too, dangerous. The part not being replaced by concrete is being replaced by recycled plastic boards, should cut costs and stand up to severe weather better, and last a really long time. - A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattTrain Posted November 6, 2010 Author Share #6 Posted November 6, 2010 Thanks for the comments, everyone. I believe the new surface is for safety reasons like what some of you have mentioned before. I don't believe, however, that it's going to compromise the entire stretch of the boardwalk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SubwayGuy Posted November 6, 2010 Share #7 Posted November 6, 2010 It's not for safety reasons and anyone saying that is BSing you. It's because they claim the cost to maintain the new surface is cheaper than maintaining a real boardwalk. In other words it's all about money as usual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattTrain Posted November 6, 2010 Author Share #8 Posted November 6, 2010 It's not for safety reasons and anyone saying that is BSing you. It's because they claim the cost to maintain the new surface is cheaper than maintaining a real boardwalk. In other words it's all about money as usual. So Money is the main reason after all...I see it now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metsfan Posted November 8, 2010 Share #9 Posted November 8, 2010 The boardwalk in high traffic areas, especially parts that see people year round, can wear out really fast & become unsafe. Instead of rebuilding & fencing parts off etc every few years, they are replacing the wood with stuff that will not need such expensive upkeep. Key areas will still have wood, but most of it will be the recycled plastic when all is said and done. Also, do you realize how may trees it takes to keep refreshing the top every few years? - A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forest Glen Posted November 8, 2010 Share #10 Posted November 8, 2010 I don't mind the boardwalk being replaced. I do mind the continued gentrification of Coney Island. Getting rid of Shoot the Freak wasn't right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INDman Posted November 8, 2010 Share #11 Posted November 8, 2010 This is not the Coney Island Board Walk, the section where this is placed is Brighton Beach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilbluefoxie Posted November 8, 2010 Share #12 Posted November 8, 2010 the new sections look great, very modern and clean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INDman Posted November 9, 2010 Share #13 Posted November 9, 2010 Sorry, splinters, stubbed toes, raised boards and the like are part of the charm of the real Coney Island Boardwalk. I'm glad that they haven't done this shit to the real board walk, to hell with Brighton and Manhattan Beaches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CenSin Posted November 9, 2010 Share #14 Posted November 9, 2010 I do mind the continued gentrification of Coney Island. I don't really see what's so bad about gentrification. I live on a street with dog owners who don't even care enough to clean up after their dog's waste. I'm forced to use the road to walk a block rather than the sidewalk. It's about twice a week that I have to put up with this nasty crap. If gentrification means ousting these people and bringing in people who care about the neighborhood aesthetics, I welcome it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INDman Posted November 9, 2010 Share #15 Posted November 9, 2010 If gentrification means ousting these people and bringing in people who care about the neighborhood aesthetics, I welcome it. Does your family own the apartment or house you live in? If not, say goodbye to it once your land lord finds some ass from the midwest who will pay double for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CenSin Posted November 9, 2010 Share #16 Posted November 9, 2010 Does your family own the apartment or house you live in? If not, say goodbye to it once your land lord finds some ass from the midwest who will pay double for it. We don't bow to landlords. We own our home. The area in front of my home and the surrounding ones are pretty clean. I live in a tiny island of affluence. If I walk half a block down, it's all ghetto. If I walk one street over, it's nothing but people loafing around on the street all day living their unproductive lives. I hear them shouting at each other across the street when I go to work and when I come back from work. I try to stay out of trouble by keeping along the main avenues and streets between my home and the Coney Island station every day. One of these days, the 'hood will be razed and something better will rise from the remains. The new developments in Coney Island are good signs so far. I'm hoping this list will also be a figment of the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Concourse Posted November 9, 2010 Share #17 Posted November 9, 2010 If your hood does get razed, then that would be a good thing in terms of home owners selling their land for a higher price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SubwayGuy Posted November 9, 2010 Share #18 Posted November 9, 2010 In response to an earlier post in this thread yes getting rid of Shoot the Freak was BS. It's also BS that they are or will plan to get rid of Ruby's Bar and Grill. New development destroys the old charm of places and no one holds the developers accountable to respecting the spirit of the place they are developing in. Gentrification is not good if you RENT. You'll get priced out and have to move. If you OWN, it also costs you because when your property value goes up, so do your property taxes. The only way it benefits you is it gives you a safer, quieter neighborhood, and if the gentrification is rapid and you sell immediately after, you can make real estate profit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.