Dj Hammers Posted December 30, 2017 Share #4726 Posted December 30, 2017 (edited) 11 minutes ago, LTA1992 said: Impossible. After the November 30th mishap, the train didn't go back into service until December 6th. Technically, the test isn't over until January 4th. The failure review board reviewed the details on what happened. Based on the nature of the issue, it was decided that the clock would not be reset upon resumption of testing on the 6th. Hence the train has completed its 30 day test. Notice that the delivery and testing of production cars is already underway. Edited December 30, 2017 by Dj Hammers 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
subwaycommuter1983 Posted December 30, 2017 Share #4727 Posted December 30, 2017 5 hours ago, Dj Hammers said: Contrary to unsubstantiated rumors otherwise, the R179s have passed their 30-day test! In that case, let's start preparing those swan songs for the r42s. They'll be retired in a matter of weeks. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTA Bus Posted December 30, 2017 Share #4728 Posted December 30, 2017 Just now, subwaycommuter1983 said: In that case, let's start preparing those swan songs for the r42s. They'll be retired in a matter of weeks. From what I'm hearing, the R42s might be here for a little while longer, just not on the (j). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R42N Posted December 30, 2017 Share #4729 Posted December 30, 2017 (edited) 3 minutes ago, MTA Bus said: From what I'm hearing, the R42s might be here for a little while longer, just not on the (j). h, really? ctually, I’ve heard that too. (P.S - Even if wht I’ve heard is wrong, they will have to stay on the Shuttle until the full line re-opens, so they are guaranteed to be around thru Spring 2018. Edited December 30, 2017 by R42N 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTK246 Posted December 30, 2017 Share #4730 Posted December 30, 2017 10 minutes ago, Dj Hammers said: The failure review board reviewed the details on what happened. Based on the nature of the issue, it was decided that the clock would not be reset upon resumption of testing on the 6th. Hence the train has completed its 30 day test. Notice that the delivery and testing of production cars is already underway. Know anything about car assignments? They’re serious business, as you know. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dj Hammers Posted December 30, 2017 Share #4731 Posted December 30, 2017 (edited) 14 minutes ago, subwaycommuter1983 said: In that case, let's start preparing those swan songs for the r42s. They'll be retired in a matter of weeks. Not necessarily actually! Unless plans change, they’ll be around for the Canarsie shutdown. Overall car requirements will increase during the shutdown 6 minutes ago, CTK246 said: Know anything about car assignments? They’re serious business, as you know. I’m very well acquainted with the actual car assignment plans being worked on jointly by Ops Planning and Car Equipment - I’m somewhat involved in the process. I can’t really talk in detail about them publicly yet. They are indeed “Serious business” lol Edited December 30, 2017 by Dj Hammers 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoHacksJustKhaks Posted December 30, 2017 Share #4732 Posted December 30, 2017 1 minute ago, Dj Hammers said: I’m very well acquainted with the actual car assignment plans being worked on jointly by Ops Planning and Car Equipment - I’m somewhat involved in the process. I can’t really talk in detail about them publicly yet. They are indeed “Serious business” lol Initiates Speculation 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Around the Horn Posted December 30, 2017 Share #4733 Posted December 30, 2017 1 hour ago, MTA Bus said: From what I'm hearing, the R42s might be here for a little while longer, just not on the (j). It sh ll e very interesting... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIP Posted December 30, 2017 Share #4734 Posted December 30, 2017 I can also contest that once more R179’s enter service, East New York’s R42’s gets transferred out. 😏 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco Posted December 30, 2017 Share #4735 Posted December 30, 2017 I wouldn't be surprised to see 3050-3057 on the very soon, but what about 3010-3019? Last time someone saw that set was on Brighton, and it was just 3010-3014. Where is 3015-3019? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Around the Horn Posted December 30, 2017 Share #4736 Posted December 30, 2017 Just now, Bosco said: I wouldn't be surprised to see 3050-3057 on the very soon, but what about 3010-3019? Last time someone saw that set was on Brighton, and it was just 3010-3014. Where is 3015-3019? All ten cars are on property... that ten car set is filled with all sorts of bugs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayJay85 Posted December 30, 2017 Share #4737 Posted December 30, 2017 2 hours ago, Dj Hammers said: Not necessarily actually! Unless plans change, they’ll be around for the Canarsie shutdown. Overall car requirements will increase during the shutdown I’m very well acquainted with the actual car assignment plans being worked on jointly by Ops Planning and Car Equipment - I’m somewhat involved in the process. I can’t really talk in detail about them publicly yet. They are indeed “Serious business” lol I notice the rumors I heard from the inside the TA that R179 order will be mostly 5 car units, it was modified recently. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trainfan22 Posted December 30, 2017 Share #4738 Posted December 30, 2017 3093 and the other 3 cars in its set is parked by itself upstairs at ENY, its boxed in by some 32s parked on the same track. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T to Dyre Avenue Posted December 31, 2017 Share #4739 Posted December 31, 2017 23 hours ago, Dj Hammers said: The failure review board reviewed the details on what happened. Based on the nature of the issue, it was decided that the clock would not be reset upon resumption of testing on the 6th. Hence the train has completed its 30 day test. Notice that the delivery and testing of production cars is already underway. If so, then bring on the production R179s! 23 hours ago, MTA Bus said: From what I'm hearing, the R42s might be here for a little while longer, just not on the (j). Well yes, they’ll still be on the M shuttle. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LTA1992 Posted December 31, 2017 Share #4740 Posted December 31, 2017 On 12/29/2017 at 10:57 PM, Dj Hammers said: The failure review board reviewed the details on what happened. Based on the nature of the issue, it was decided that the clock would not be reset upon resumption of testing on the 6th. Hence the train has completed its 30 day test. Notice that the delivery and testing of production cars is already underway. That....sounds like cheating. Literally. While I do hope for the cars success, I feel like that was done in order to anymore unneeded press. But what do I know? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Around the Horn Posted December 31, 2017 Share #4741 Posted December 31, 2017 13 minutes ago, LTA1992 said: That....sounds like cheating. Literally. While I do hope for the cars success, I feel like that was done in order to anymore unneeded press. But what do I know? That's the process for every car order 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cait Sith Posted December 31, 2017 Share #4742 Posted December 31, 2017 22 minutes ago, LTA1992 said: That....sounds like cheating. Literally. While I do hope for the cars success, I feel like that was done in order to anymore unneeded press. But what do I know? Look at it this way.....the R142s never legally passed. They fixed the issues with the cars as they came in. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LTA1992 Posted December 31, 2017 Share #4743 Posted December 31, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, Around the Horn said: That's the process for every car order To not legally pass their tests? 2 hours ago, Cait Sith said: Look at it this way.....the R142s never legally passed. They fixed the issues with the cars as they came in. You know, I did not know that. Totally new info that I have somehow never seen. Thanks for that. Mind you, they became some of the best running cars. It's just another reason for me to continue along with the confidence that this order will follow suit. Edited December 31, 2017 by LTA1992 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Around the Horn Posted December 31, 2017 Share #4744 Posted December 31, 2017 24 minutes ago, LTA1992 said: To not legally pass their tests? The failure review board (consisting of both MTA personnel and manufacturer personnel) review the issues and determine if it warrants a clock reset. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trainfan22 Posted January 1, 2018 Share #4745 Posted January 1, 2018 They probably rushed the bomb 142 order because most of the redbird car classes other than the 33ML/WF were in real bad shape and needed to be replaced ASAP, they were jokingly called "rustbirds" and people were regularly getting killed on the cars due to getting dragged in the doors. Whatever issues bomb 142s had early on probably wasn't a threat to the passengers safety and the TA probably thought they were better off with buggy 142s rather than dangerous Redbirds which were a PR nightmare at the time, they was always on the news because riders kept getting dragged in the doors. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco Posted January 2, 2018 Share #4746 Posted January 2, 2018 22 minutes ago, trainfan22 said: They probably rushed the bomb 142 order because most of the redbird car classes other than the 33ML/WF were in real bad shape and needed to be replaced ASAP, they were jokingly called "rustbirds" and people were regularly getting killed on the cars due to getting dragged in the doors. Whatever issues bomb 142s had early on probably wasn't a threat to the passengers safety and the TA probably thought they were better off with buggy 142s rather than dangerous Redbirds which were a PR nightmare at the time, they was always on the news because riders kept getting dragged in the doors. In addition to that, the R142As had their share of major teething issues as well, having to be pulled from service along with the R142s:http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/17/nyregion/new-subway-cars-show-flaws-and-are-removed-for-repairs.html 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T to Dyre Avenue Posted January 2, 2018 Share #4747 Posted January 2, 2018 (edited) I remember all that. The old SubTalk message board on NYC Subway Resources was constantly buzzing over the R142 and R142A teething troubles back then. Plenty of posters cheering every time R142 deliveries got delayed or whenever R142s or R142As got pulled out of service (oh, those crazy foamers!). Edited January 2, 2018 by T to Dyre Avenue 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lance Posted January 2, 2018 Share #4748 Posted January 2, 2018 I took a look at those archives some time ago just out of curiosity's sake and I'll tell you, they're good for a laugh. If one were to go by some of the comments regarding these then-new trains, you'd believe they were the 44s and 46s of the new millennium, nothing but useless lemons that weren't cut out for real service. It's actually quite amusing that as time goes on, some things remain the same. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoHacksJustKhaks Posted January 2, 2018 Share #4749 Posted January 2, 2018 18 hours ago, T to Dyre Avenue said: I remember all that. The old SubTalk message board on NYC Subway Resources was constantly buzzing over the R142 and R142A teething troubles back then. Plenty of posters cheering every time R142 deliveries got delayed or whenever R142s or R142As got pulled out of service (oh, those crazy foamers!). Just wait when the R211's start getting delivered and the foamers go crazy over the death of the R32's 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T to Dyre Avenue Posted January 2, 2018 Share #4750 Posted January 2, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, Lance said: I took a look at those archives some time ago just out of curiosity's sake and I'll tell you, they're good for a laugh. If one were to go by some of the comments regarding these then-new trains, you'd believe they were the 44s and 46s of the new millennium, nothing but useless lemons that weren't cut out for real service. It's actually quite amusing that as time goes on, some things remain the same. I think some of the posters on SubTalk really believed they were. Or the R16s of the new millennium. The first couple hundred R142s built (not delivered, because a lot of them were delivered out of sequence) had the same numbers as the R16s. 1 hour ago, NoHacksJustKhaks said: Just wait when the R211's start getting delivered and the foamers go crazy over the death of the R32's Probably so, especially on SubChat. Though I didn’t seem to see all that much cheering over there about the R179s being late or pulled out of service (and none here; just frustration) so who knows? Edited January 2, 2018 by T to Dyre Avenue 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.