Jump to content

R179 Discussion Thread


East New York

Recommended Posts


  • Replies 10.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
8 hours ago, m2fwannabe said:

4-car R-179 deliveries seem to have petered out :(

I completely understand this. I just as badly want all the four-car R179s in service as you do.

However, even though I don't like to do this, we have to be patient. There's still plenty of wiggle room between today and the shutdown for all the R179s to be on property. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Coney Island Av said:

I completely understand this. I just as badly want all the four-car R179s in service as you do.

However, even though I don't like to do this, we have to be patient. There's still plenty of wiggle room between today and the shutdown for all the R179s to be on property. 

That's true and don't be surprised if delivery is accelerated once all issues have been solved on the 10 car r179's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There haven't been any posts regarding numbering of the 5-car sets, nor confirmation of them.

That said, 3010-3049 is likely still the same as before; I'm guessing the rest of them will be 3246-3325.  The only other possibility for them would be to start numbering backwards (2930-3049), which isn't likely given the MTA's option not to number over the R110Bs in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Bosco said:

There haven't been any posts regarding numbering of the 5-car sets, nor confirmation of them.

That said, 3010-3049 is likely still the same as before; I'm guessing the rest of them will be 3246-3325.  The only other possibility for them would be to start numbering backwards (2930-3049), which isn't likely given the MTA's option not to number over the R110Bs in the first place.

When I heard about the possibility of a renumbering I was thinking that possibly the ten cars from 3010-3049 got renumbered so that all ten cars were at the end and 3010-49 got filled with more 8 cars.

3010-3205 8 car, 3206-3325 10 car

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/21/2018 at 5:53 PM, VIP said:

Anyone else notice Less R143’s running on the (J) line?

Yep. Noticed this since last week. Seen only one set on the (J) today. It got layed up as soon it pulled into JC. Usually there's more 143s than 160s on the (J), now, it's the other way around.

Edited by trainfan22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/24/2018 at 8:41 PM, Bosco said:

There haven't been any posts regarding numbering of the 5-car sets, nor confirmation of them.

That said, 3010-3049 is likely still the same as before; I'm guessing the rest of them will be 3246-3325.  The only other possibility for them would be to start numbering backwards (2930-3049), which isn't likely given the MTA's option not to number over the R110Bs in the first place.

Well, you can confirm it now.  Nice read on the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.