Jchambers2120 Posted August 17, 2017 Share #16426 Posted August 17, 2017 *How many trains go to/from New Lots Av? One departs at 5:54am to Eastchester-Dyre, the next/last train departs New Lots at 7:54am to e180. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
junion Posted August 17, 2017 Share #16427 Posted August 17, 2017 That's my username. Except it's the Broadway/Brighton instead of the Sixth Av . I only use the old logo instead of the new one just because there ain't a yellow . - to 96 St Doesn't that make it a ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
junion Posted August 18, 2017 Share #16428 Posted August 18, 2017 Yes but when the 86-88 Broadway ran, it was skip-stop with the , just like the (1)/ and (J)/ . And the Broadway/Brighton terminated at 57 St-7 Av, as this was a few decades before SAS opened. to 96 St I wonder why they did skip stop, and not regular local and express service on the Brighton line 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fresh Pond Posted August 18, 2017 Share #16429 Posted August 18, 2017 I wonder why they did skip stop, and not regular local and express service on the Brighton line Because at that time, they was doing construction along the line. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIP Posted August 18, 2017 Share #16430 Posted August 18, 2017 Since when did the start running headways of every 7 minutes ?!?So most the Jamaica Center trains don't have the scroll anymore. Why do they keep changing the R160 programs?? ???? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGA Link N Train Posted August 18, 2017 Share #16431 Posted August 18, 2017 What if the Chrystie Street connection was rebuilt to make room for the Second Avenue subway Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quadcorder Posted August 18, 2017 Share #16432 Posted August 18, 2017 What if the Chrystie Street connection was rebuilt to make room for the Second Avenue subway Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk You mean like this? http://www.vanshnookenraggen.com/_index/2017/05/the-future-of-the-2nd-avenue-subway/ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGA Link N Train Posted August 18, 2017 Share #16433 Posted August 18, 2017 You mean like this? http://www.vanshnookenraggen.com/_index/2017/05/the-future-of-the-2nd-avenue-subway/Kinda, but not exactly like vanshnookenraggen Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abba Posted August 18, 2017 Share #16434 Posted August 18, 2017 Is the MTA in the mood to post every BIE today so far it posted maybe 10 today 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abba Posted August 18, 2017 Share #16435 Posted August 18, 2017 2 days ago I thought my train went into emergency I liked freaked out but they driver said he was just charging up or something . But it would be nice it there was some other solution for this problem . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Far Rock Depot Posted August 18, 2017 Share #16436 Posted August 18, 2017 What if the Chrystie Street connection was rebuilt to make room for the Second Avenue subway Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk The original plan for chrystie when built was to allow SAS, when built, to become "local" tracks at Grand St and converting the side platforms into island platforms. The section of SAS tunnel originally built by the Manhattan bridge was aligned for this. Is this possibly what you're asking about? Sent from my LGLS755 using Tapatalk 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulrivera Posted August 19, 2017 Share #16437 Posted August 19, 2017 They have platform conductors at Fordham and Tremont on the directing customers for the 183rd bypass GO. Kudos to the for providing some on the field customer service. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calvin Posted August 20, 2017 Share #16438 Posted August 20, 2017 (edited) I don't know if this was answered but, how did the train became 11 cars in-total for a train? Also, how was the 11-car train formed on the with Redbirds? Edited August 20, 2017 by CH3348 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGA Link N Train Posted August 20, 2017 Share #16439 Posted August 20, 2017 The original plan for chrystie when built was to allow SAS, when built, to become "local" tracks at Grand St and converting the side platforms into island platforms. The section of SAS tunnel originally built by the Manhattan bridge was aligned for this. Is this possibly what you're asking about? Sent from my LGLS755 using Tapatalk A better alignment Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Union Tpke Posted August 20, 2017 Share #16440 Posted August 20, 2017 I don't know if this was answered but, how did the train became 11 cars in-total for a train? Also, how was the 11-car train formed on the with Redbirds? The R36WFs were in two car sets. A train ran with 5 sets of those, and a R33WF, which was just a single-car. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Around the Horn Posted August 20, 2017 Share #16441 Posted August 20, 2017 I'll just leave this here: 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGA Link N Train Posted August 21, 2017 Share #16442 Posted August 21, 2017 (edited) Random thought, what if the and/or train replaced the and trains and the and maybe a new or train ran to the manhattan bridge and replace the south of Chambers Street (Note- that means expanding the Fulton Center and Broad Street Platforms) since R32's and R42's are banned from Montague,then in Brooklyn the can replace the the can replace the and a third second avenue train, maybe an or (U) train, could run via Fulton Street via Montague Street or under 4 Avenue. The could go back to Nassau, IDK Edited August 21, 2017 by LGA Link N train 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongLiveRock Posted August 21, 2017 Share #16443 Posted August 21, 2017 Random thought, what if the and/or train replaced the and trains and the and maybe a new or train ran to the manhattan bridge and replace the south of Chambers Street (Note- that means expanding the Fulton Center and Broad Street Platforms) since R32's and R42's are banned from Montague,then in Brooklyn the can replace the the can replace the and a third second avenue train, maybe an or (U) train, could run via Fulton Street via Montague Street or under 4 Avenue. The could go back to Nassau, IDK But why 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGA Link N Train Posted August 21, 2017 Share #16444 Posted August 21, 2017 But whyStarters, Nassau is Heavily underutilized Next, people in Williamsburg want a ride to midtown A reduced need for the would be in effect A better system integration for the Second Avenue Subway Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Around the Horn Posted August 21, 2017 Share #16445 Posted August 21, 2017 Starters, Nassau is Heavily underutilized Next, people in Williamsburg want a ride to midtown A reduced need for the would be in effect A better system integration for the Second Avenue Subway Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk Nassau is heavily underutilized because it has low ridership. None of that proposal is necessary. Also people want 6th Avenue in Midtown not 2nd Avenue, the entirety of Southern Brooklyn would riot if the and got taken away... 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGA Link N Train Posted August 21, 2017 Share #16446 Posted August 21, 2017 Nassau is heavily underutilized because it has low ridership. None of that proposal is necessary. Also people want 6th Avenue in Midtown not 2nd Avenue, the entirety of Southern Brooklyn would riot if the and got taken away... They'll still have the and maybe a new express train at least, you could send the down via the then at Jay Street, it could switch over to the then continue as an Express. Then past Church Avenue, the could be peak express Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BM5 via Woodhaven Posted August 21, 2017 Share #16447 Posted August 21, 2017 They'll still have the and maybe a new express train at least, you could send the down via the then at Jay Street, it could switch over to the then continue as an Express. Then past Church Avenue, the could be peak express Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk So what happens to West End??? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGA Link N Train Posted August 21, 2017 Share #16448 Posted August 21, 2017 So what happens to West End???The train takes over, and anyone who want to go to 6 Av can either Transfer to a Broadway train or the (and maybe a supplemental or train) at Houston Street Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk However, in my proposal the Broadway Junction interlocking would have to be reorganized and the , , and trains would have to be rearranged Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGA Link N Train Posted August 21, 2017 Share #16449 Posted August 21, 2017 (edited) If anyone wants a refrence, here it is http://www.vanshnookenraggen.com/_index/2016/02/futurenycsubway-2016/ Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk Edited August 21, 2017 by LGA Link N train 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGA Link N Train Posted August 21, 2017 Share #16450 Posted August 21, 2017 You know the has to merge with the at W 4 St, the at Spring, the at Canal, and the again at Jay St? There is no direct connection between the 6 Av EXPRESS tracks and the 8 Av Exp tracks. Talk about merging madness!So have the switch to the local tracks by building a new double crossover switch just before Broadway - Lafayette???? Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.