Orion6025 Posted May 8, 2019 Share #21201 Posted May 8, 2019 Since when did the MTA start putting LED advertising panels in subway cars (the square ones next to the doors)? 7560 has at least one 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enjineer Posted May 8, 2019 Share #21202 Posted May 8, 2019 17 minutes ago, Orion6025 said: Since when did the MTA start putting LED advertising panels in subway cars (the square ones next to the doors)? 7560 has at least one I believe this is a recent thing they've begun to test on the R188s. I haven't seen one personally yet 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SubwayFan3000 Posted May 8, 2019 Share #21203 Posted May 8, 2019 18 hours ago, Bay Ridge Express said: NTTs everywhere! The horror! /s Why Horror? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enjineer Posted May 8, 2019 Share #21204 Posted May 8, 2019 1 hour ago, subwayfan1998 said: Why Horror? You missed the /s, which is used to denote sarcasm lol 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewFlyer 230 Posted May 9, 2019 Share #21205 Posted May 9, 2019 (edited) Does anyone think that the weekend extension along 6th Ave to 96th street will become a permanent thing after the whole project is done? I feel that having a 3rd service along will perhaps be something that is requested especially if more people from 2nd Ave use it to access Midtown/ 6th Ave and northern Brooklyn. I also think that it’s good having another along 6th anyways. I just wonder why the MTA has not updated station signs to reflect that the goes to 96th Street late evenings and weekends. Those pink fliers that they are placed in the stations are already falling down and I think not having proper signage will confuse people. The to 96th is not even on the map so it makes me wonder if they ever plan to put it on there. Edited May 9, 2019 by NewFlyer 230 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremiahC99 Posted May 9, 2019 Share #21206 Posted May 9, 2019 5 hours ago, NewFlyer 230 said: Does anyone think that the weekend extension along 6th Ave to 96th street will become a permanent thing after the whole project is done? I feel that having a 3rd service along will perhaps be something that is requested especially if more people from 2nd Ave use it to access Midtown/ 6th Ave and northern Brooklyn. I also think that it’s good having another along 6th anyways. Yeah why not? It would be really great for the Upper East Side. Provides direct service between the Myrtle Avenue corridor and all of the weekend shopping that exists in SoHo and Midtown (Essex Street is not even close to SoHo). I am also proposing both the and be extended to Jamaica-179th Street and have the moved off the express tracks at all times except late nights, when it would continue to make the slow switching maneuver at 75th Avenue (which delays train service). This would allow for direct service between Hillside Avenue and the Broadways corridor for Broadway theater goers and those looking to see The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. 6th Avenue riders would see an increase in trip time by 3-5 minutes but everyone else would save time. Also, late night service should also be extended to Essex Street to permit easy travel between Brooklyn and the nigh life that exists in the Lower East Side. To accompany this, I would also propose either extending the / lines together to Bay Ridge-95th Street or a separate route from the / that would either operate between Broadway Jct and 95th Street or overlay the current (NOT replace it) and operate between Metro Avenue and 95th Street. This would improve service. Finally, I am proposing that service have headway increases. During weekdays, service would operate with 14 trains per hour, with / service operating at 10 trains per hour. This would provide more frequent service for riders. service may be reduced, but given how passengers north of Church Avenue has the train and south of Church Avenue have an easy crosstown walk or bus ride to other train lines, like the and , all of which can take on additional riders, they’ll be fine. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R68OnBroadway Posted May 9, 2019 Share #21207 Posted May 9, 2019 (edited) An extension of the to 179th is a poor idea as it should be removed from QBL entirely. ( to 96, to Astoria, eliminated) An extension of the is also a bad idea as the line doesn’t need to be longer and less reliable. Edited May 9, 2019 by R68OnBroadway 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremiahC99 Posted May 9, 2019 Share #21208 Posted May 9, 2019 17 minutes ago, R68OnBroadway said: An extension of the is also a bad idea as the line doesn’t need to be longer and less reliable. I also proposed a counter-proposal of an new route running between Broadway Junction on the or Metropolitan Avenue on the and 95th Street. It would supplement the existing routes, not replace them Clearly you missed that part. 19 minutes ago, R68OnBroadway said: An extension of the to 179th is a poor idea as it should be removed from QBL entirely. ( to 96, to Astoria, eliminated) Not without a new yard for the train fleet. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R68OnBroadway Posted May 9, 2019 Share #21209 Posted May 9, 2019 33 minutes ago, JeremiahC99 said: I also proposed a counter-proposal of an new route running between Broadway Junction on the or Metropolitan Avenue on the and 95th Street. It would supplement the existing routes, not replace them Clearly you missed that part. Not without a new yard for the train fleet. I read the proposal and stated that the extension was bad to rule out that part. As for the , we have gone over this about 10 million times. While the cars would get extra mileage from deadheading, it wouldn’t be the end of the world. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremiahC99 Posted May 9, 2019 Share #21210 Posted May 9, 2019 7 minutes ago, R68OnBroadway said: As for the , we have gone over this about 10 million times. While the cars would get extra mileage from deadheading, it wouldn’t be the end of the world. With the conversion of the 36th Street Yard for passenger use, it could be viable for the to use that yard for train maintenance, with around 12 storage tracks used for storing trains, and some work trains relocated to nearby Coney Island Yard and other areas. However, that project is part of the Second Avenue Subway project, which will provide additional train cars for service in Phase 3, whenever the hell that opens, so the reroute of the would have to wait until the yard conversion is complete to avoid potential reliability problems. Building a new yard in Astoria, good luck convincing Astoria residents. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Around the Horn Posted May 9, 2019 Share #21211 Posted May 9, 2019 There's a new program for the on one of the R179s and I have no idea what they were thinking... JAMAICA SKIP-STOP (ok good) BROADWAY LOCAL (um... what...) BROAD ST (meh, it said that before) I still don't understand their aversion to Nassau Street for one and two "Broadway Local"? That's totally not going to get confused with the Broadway line in Manhattan... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIP Posted May 9, 2019 Share #21212 Posted May 9, 2019 1 hour ago, Around the Horn said: There's a new program for the on one of the R179s and I have no idea what they were thinking... JAMAICA SKIP-STOP (ok good) BROADWAY LOCAL (um... what...) BROAD ST (meh, it said that before) I still don't understand their aversion to Nassau Street for one and two "Broadway Local"? That's totally not going to get confused with the Broadway line in Manhattan... It should have been “BWAY-BKLYN LOCAL” as they programmed with the when it ran to Broadway Jct. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SubwayFan3000 Posted May 9, 2019 Share #21213 Posted May 9, 2019 How would NYC Subway would have look like now, if September 11th Terror Attacks never happened? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Union Tpke Posted May 9, 2019 Share #21214 Posted May 9, 2019 57 minutes ago, subwayfan1998 said: How would NYC Subway would have look like now, if September 11th Terror Attacks never happened? Cortlandt St would still exist as it was. service would have started on 9/17. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SubwayFan3000 Posted May 9, 2019 Share #21215 Posted May 9, 2019 1 minute ago, Union Tpke said: Cortlandt St would still exist as it was. service would have started on 9/17. were there any plans to introduce service before 9/11? Without 9/11, Would the NYC Subways would still look the Same Except Cortlandt St? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ibroketheprinter Posted May 9, 2019 Share #21216 Posted May 9, 2019 42 minutes ago, subwayfan1998 said: Without 9/11, Would the NYC Subways would still look the Same Except Cortlandt St? Yes. The only station that was damaged was Cortlandt. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Union Tpke Posted May 9, 2019 Share #21217 Posted May 9, 2019 http://web.mta.info/capitaldashboard/CPDPlan.html?PLN=7N7110105 Demolition Madison Ave HQ Campus This project will demolish the MTA's old headquarters at 347 Madison Avenue in anticipation of the building's sale. Start 2019 End 2020 $25,000,000 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxwell179 Posted May 9, 2019 Share #21218 Posted May 9, 2019 8 hours ago, Around the Horn said: There's a new program for the on one of the R179s and I have no idea what they were thinking... JAMAICA SKIP-STOP (ok good) BROADWAY LOCAL (um... what...) BROAD ST (meh, it said that before) I still don't understand their aversion to Nassau Street for one and two "Broadway Local"? That's totally not going to get confused with the Broadway line in Manhattan... They run completely different routes , who’s really gonna get confused ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxwell179 Posted May 9, 2019 Share #21219 Posted May 9, 2019 (edited) 6 hours ago, VIP said: It should have been “BWAY-BKLYN LOCAL” as they programmed with the when it ran to Broadway Jct. that definitely would’ve made more sense 😭 ( not sarcasm ) Edited May 9, 2019 by Maxwell179 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielhg121 Posted May 10, 2019 Share #21220 Posted May 10, 2019 35 minutes ago, Maxwell179 said: They run completely different routes , who’s really gonna get confused ? Uhhhhhhh..........Any tourist? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Around the Horn Posted May 10, 2019 Share #21221 Posted May 10, 2019 34 minutes ago, Maxwell179 said: They run completely different routes , who’s really gonna get confused ? Even so it's a policy to not have two lines share names... (of course since it's the MTA, they break their own style guide rules all the time) This is the same reason why the is called the "Broadway-7th Avenue Local" and the are the "7th Avenue Express" Officially the is the "Nassau Street-Jamaica Line" and the Jamaica Line hasn't been called the Broadway Brooklyn line since 1976. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxwell179 Posted May 10, 2019 Share #21222 Posted May 10, 2019 19 minutes ago, Around the Horn said: Even so it's a policy to not have two lines share names... (of course since it's the MTA, they break their own style guide rules all the time) This is the same reason why the is called the "Broadway-7th Avenue Local" and the are the "7th Avenue Express" Officially the is the "Nassau Street-Jamaica Line" and the Jamaica Line hasn't been called the Broadway Brooklyn line since 1976. Learn something new everyday 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxwell179 Posted May 10, 2019 Share #21223 Posted May 10, 2019 22 minutes ago, danielhg121 said: Uhhhhhhh..........Any tourist? ehh I doubt it but I guess 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RR503 Posted May 10, 2019 Share #21224 Posted May 10, 2019 150 years ago today, the first transcontinental railroad was completed. Happy birthday, Promontory! 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lance Posted May 10, 2019 Share #21225 Posted May 10, 2019 On 5/8/2019 at 8:53 AM, Q23 via 108 said: The Subway is going to have two types of cars. The NTTs and the open gangway R2XXs. Its going to be really bland since the post 90s cars are so similar. A Transit fan will tell the difference. But to the average person, they are nearly identical. The only main thing separating the NTTs are the Propulsion sounds. Other than that, they look the same on both the interior and exterior. Besides sound (and maybe some little things here and there) What's different about a R142 - R142A - and R188? What's different about an R143, R160A, R160B, R179. To me, they are all the same train. And the subway system is getting more stale by the day. Eh, it’s all cyclical in my opinion. Go back 60 years and you could say the same thing about all of the R-series in service at the time. Aside from the color scheme on the various cars and slight variations in the cars’ design, they all looked quite similar. Even the 32s and 38s with their stainless steel builds were not that much of a departure from the previous car design. It wouldn’t be until the 40s were debuted that a major shift in car design occurred. On 5/9/2019 at 1:51 AM, NewFlyer 230 said: Does anyone think that the weekend extension along 6th Ave to 96th street will become a permanent thing after the whole project is done? I feel that having a 3rd service along will perhaps be something that is requested especially if more people from 2nd Ave use it to access Midtown/ 6th Ave and northern Brooklyn. I also think that it’s good having another along 6th anyways. I just wonder why the MTA has not updated station signs to reflect that the goes to 96th Street late evenings and weekends. Those pink fliers that they are placed in the stations are already falling down and I think not having proper signage will confuse people. The to 96th is not even on the map so it makes me wonder if they ever plan to put it on there. It’s quite possible that the weekend M will prove popular even after the Canarsie work wraps up. It all depends on the MTA’s finances whether the extension sticks around beyond next year. As for the weekend route not appearing on the maps, that’s not surprising since the map clearly notes that it displays weekday service only. Weekend and late-night service is denoted in the box. However, there’s no reason why the overhead signs haven’t been updated. They should reflect what’s in the schedules. On 5/9/2019 at 7:42 AM, JeremiahC99 said: I am also proposing both the and be extended to Jamaica-179th Street and have the moved off the express tracks at all times except late nights, when it would continue to make the slow switching maneuver at 75th Avenue (which delays train service). This would allow for direct service between Hillside Avenue and the Broadways corridor for Broadway theater goers and those looking to see The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. 6th Avenue riders would see an increase in trip time by 3-5 minutes but everyone else would save time. I’m ambivalent on the rest of your post, but sending both the M and R to 179 Street just moves the fumigation problem at Forest Hills there. While 179 Street is more than capable of turning that much service, the entire line will be slowed down by the increased amount of relaying required for the F, M and R lines. Also, such an extension serves very little purpose as riders will bail the locals at the first opportunity, especially from that far along the line. The only ones who’d benefit are Hillside riders seeking Queens Blvd local stops and vice-versa, which I’m sure is a relatively low amount of riders on the line. 21 hours ago, Around the Horn said: There's a new program for the on one of the R179s and I have no idea what they were thinking... JAMAICA SKIP-STOP (ok good) BROADWAY LOCAL (um... what...) BROAD ST (meh, it said that before) They sure do love to change the signs, don’t they? And yet, the super-abbreviated displays on the 188s remain. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.