TwoTimer Posted May 26, 2011 Share #51 Posted May 26, 2011 Could do one better and terminate the at Whitehall which would allow the and to continue thru the bypass (which forces 4Av express to 36th) 24/7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo M 201 Posted May 26, 2011 Share #52 Posted May 26, 2011 Could do one better and terminate the at Whitehall which would allow the and to continue thru the bypass (which forces 4Av express to 36th) 24/7. Or better yet, terminate at Canal Street so it connects back with the , so that Rector St, Cortlandt St, and City Hall are still served. Looking at the track map, it would only be able to go in and out of the northbound platform (thats the better side to be on anyway), but switches are available south of the station to go back southbound (as long as trains are not layed up on those express tracks). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shortline Bus Posted May 26, 2011 Author Share #53 Posted May 26, 2011 i think he means without having to switch trains to get to Atlantic/Pacific from the shuttle. Thank You. That what I meant. I still this should in service since like 1999. It would cost the little or no extra costs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Of RedBirds Posted May 26, 2011 Share #54 Posted May 26, 2011 Maybe they should have the run to Myrtle all except weekends and the (Mx) do the old pattern. I don't see the problem with having 2 (M)'s or the run to Metropolotan ave Late Nights. Maybe the could have Less waiting times to go to Jamaica Or Middle Village. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendell Posted May 26, 2011 Share #55 Posted May 26, 2011 If There were two s Then All Trains would have to wait a lot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shortline Bus Posted May 26, 2011 Author Share #56 Posted May 26, 2011 Maybe they should have the run to Myrtle all except weekends and the (Mx) do the old pattern. I don't see the problem with having 2 (M)'s or the run to Metropolotan ave Late Nights. Maybe the could have Less waiting times to go to Jamaica Or Middle Village. Young man have you ever been on the subway after 12 Midnight? Not meant to be rude but unless you experience it, not sure these proposals means much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Via Garibaldi 8 Posted May 26, 2011 Share #57 Posted May 26, 2011 Thank You. That what I meant. I still this should in service since like 1999.It would cost the little or no extra costs. While I agree, I don't see how you came to the conclusion that it would cost nothing or very little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Of RedBirds Posted May 26, 2011 Share #58 Posted May 26, 2011 Young man have you ever been on the subway after 12 Midnight? Not meant to be rude but unless you experience it, not sure these proposals means much. The latest I've been on is 11:30. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Of RedBirds Posted May 26, 2011 Share #59 Posted May 26, 2011 If There were two s Then All Trains would have to wait a lot! Well we could have the (Mx) to Broadway Junction middle track. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Via Garibaldi 8 Posted May 26, 2011 Share #60 Posted May 26, 2011 Young man have you ever been on the subway after 12 Midnight? Not meant to be rude but unless you experience it, not sure these proposals means much. LOL@young man... Boy you sure do know how to date yourself... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbanfortitude Posted May 26, 2011 Share #61 Posted May 26, 2011 Maybe they should have the run to Myrtle all except weekends and the (Mx) do the old pattern. I don't see the problem with having 2 (M)'s or the run to Metropolotan ave Late Nights. Maybe the could have Less waiting times to go to Jamaica Or Middle Village. Do you really not see a problem with running two M lines? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Of RedBirds Posted May 26, 2011 Share #62 Posted May 26, 2011 Do you really not see a problem with running two M lines? Not really I dont take the so IDC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo M 201 Posted May 26, 2011 Share #63 Posted May 26, 2011 Silly rabbit, Trix are for kids? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Via Garibaldi 8 Posted May 26, 2011 Share #64 Posted May 26, 2011 Not really I dont take the so IDC. LOL... Even if you don't take it you should see the problem. Having two (M)s would confuse people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbanfortitude Posted May 26, 2011 Share #65 Posted May 26, 2011 Not really I dont take the so IDC. And there's why you shouldn't be suggesting ideas. You can't put yourself in the shoes of the people who rely on it so its like why should you give a rats ass. Why not take a ride out that way on a regular basis and then try suggesting stuff? Seriously, it makes me glad rail fans like yourself don't run the . What a piece of work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Via Garibaldi 8 Posted May 26, 2011 Share #66 Posted May 26, 2011 And there's why you shouldn't be suggesting ideas. You can't put yourself in the shoes of the people who rely on it so its like why should you give a rats ass. Why don't take a ride out that way on a regular basis and then try suggesting stuff? Seriously, it makes me glad rail fans like yourself don't run the . What a piece of work. Cut him some slack. He didn't mean any harm by it. Just an innocent mistake. We were all 13 once too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbanfortitude Posted May 26, 2011 Share #67 Posted May 26, 2011 Cut him some slack. He didn't mean any harm by it. Just an innocent mistake. We were all 13 once too. I'm sorry but mistakes don't sound like "I don't use it so I don't care." That's what ignorance sounds like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Via Garibaldi 8 Posted May 26, 2011 Share #68 Posted May 26, 2011 I'm sorry but mistakes don't sound like "I don't use it so I don't care." That's what ignorance sounds like. I thought he meant "I don't use it so I don't see" meaning he didn't see the problem with two trains, although he put IDC... lol He could've meant I don't care I suppose, but I assume he meant I don't see since he was responding to the question. Damn abbreviations. :mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadcruiser1 Posted May 26, 2011 Share #69 Posted May 26, 2011 I rather see the reincarnated after the Second Avenue Subway opens with the going to 96 Street. The could fill in the gap left from the (Mx), and run from Astoria-Ditmars Boulevard to Bay Parkway at all times except late nights, and weekends unless if the wants the to cross the Manhattan Bridge at all times. Then they could have the run at all times. Plus it would be a bonanza for the which can run as the Broadway Express once again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lance25 Posted May 27, 2011 Share #70 Posted May 27, 2011 I rather see the reincarnated after the Second Avenue Subway opens with the going to 96 Street. The could fill in the gap left from the (Mx), and run from Astoria-Ditmars Boulevard to Bay Parkway at all times except late nights, and weekends unless if the wants the to cross the Manhattan Bridge at all times. Then they could have the run at all times. Plus it would be a bonanza for the which can run as the Broadway Express once again. Stop acting as though Second Avenue is opening tomorrow. 2016 is a long time from now. A lot can happen in the intervening time. Plus, why would this new need to run at all times? It's not as though the southern portion of the (Mx) was that crowded. If it was, maybe it would've ran for more than rush hours. Just some food for thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E Local Posted May 27, 2011 Share #71 Posted May 27, 2011 Maybe they should have the run to Myrtle all except weekends and the (Mx) do the old pattern. I don't see the problem with having 2 (M)'s or the run to Metropolotan ave Late Nights. Maybe the could have Less waiting times to go to Jamaica Or Middle Village. You dont see a problem with two trains? ...... T.T it's like bringing back the 70(AA) :l Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E Local Posted May 27, 2011 Share #72 Posted May 27, 2011 Not really I dont take the so IDC. LOL ! I NEVER took the either but really? posting ideas of the train you never took, SMH ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2 Train Master Posted May 27, 2011 Share #73 Posted May 27, 2011 Over night service terminate at 167th St and relay.For further service take the at 161st or BX1/2 via Concourse. To Bowling Green Express on Lex late nights LMAO thats all I got. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IntExp Posted May 27, 2011 Share #74 Posted May 27, 2011 Over night service terminate at 167th St and relay.For further service take the at 161st or BX1/2 via Concourse. To Bowling Green Express on Lex late nights LMAO thats all I got. Yea, try telling that to those who live there on Concourse. I think you'll be greeted by a hearty Bronx Cheer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2 Train Master Posted May 27, 2011 Share #75 Posted May 27, 2011 Yea, try telling that to those who live there on Concourse. I think you'll be greeted by a hearty Bronx Cheer. I live on Concourse and the riders have no consideration(the riders) its like the is useless from BP to Tremont.And its funny b\c the beats the to 125th in the AM rush sometimes even 59th! How I know b\c I ride the everyday to school and from home b\c the is crowded 95% of the time and that's unnecessary loads.Anyways the is less than 5blocks from Jerome and the Concourse bus is better anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.