Jump to content
Attention: In order to reply to messages, create topics, have access to other features of the community you must sign up for an account.
Sign in to follow this  
Via Garibaldi 8

Staten Island woman wins second lawsuit against MTA

Recommended Posts

"Staten Island woman has settled a personal injury lawsuit with NYC Transit for $300,000, her second settlement with the agency in five years.

 

According to court papers, Lydia Batson suffered neck injuries in July 2006 during a collision on the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge while riding a Manhattan-bound bus.

 

Her lawyer, Louis Mauriello, tells the Staten Island Advance that the injuries exacerbated a pre-existing condition suffered during another accident in 2003 involving another city bus. He says she filed a personal-injury lawsuit in that case and settled it for about $10,000. He says NYC Transit paid $4,200 and a co-defendant paid the rest.

 

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority declined to comment on the latest settlement."

 

 

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/staten_island/staten_island_woman_settles_lawsuit_HmFwI6szLOGltJG3ViBZ8I#ixzz1PC8GE977

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Third time is a charm... I'm curious though... Where does the money come from to payout these lawsuits? I know they have insurance to cover it, but I'm just wondering if somehow these lawsuits affect us overall by way of fare increases and such??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Third time is a charm... I'm curious though... Where does the money come from to payout these lawsuits? I know they have insurance to cover it, but I'm just wondering if somehow these lawsuits affect us overall by way of fare increases and such??

 

A public authority funded by tax dollars and ridership fares. what do you think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A public authority funded by tax dollars and ridership fares. what do you think?

 

I asked because somewhere on the forum someone commented about how if a bus is in a fender bender or whatever that the insurance covers it and they mentioned that as if it was no big deal. That's why I asked because I'm curious in knowing how much does that affect fare increases and so forth? It's not something that the (MTA) talks about and in fact no one talks about it. The answer seems more obvious to you than you may think because you work with the (MTA).

Edited by Via Garibaldi 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MTA does not have insurance. They are self insured. Every payout affects fair increase

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's rip the (MTA) of all the little bit of money they have!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i always thought that if you sued the MTA, that you were barred from the system so you could not sue a a second time

 

Well that's what should have happened in this case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is stupid. These people just are stealing money from the (MTA). This needs to be stooped. It's not the (MTA)'s fault for the collision, It's the bus drivers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is stupid. These people just are stealing money from the (MTA). This needs to be stooped. It's not the (MTA)'s fault for the collision, It's the bus drivers.

 

lol... That's a dangerous thing to say around these parts... :eek:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is stupid. These people just are stealing money from the (MTA). This needs to be stopped. It's not the (MTA)'s fault for the collision, It's the bus drivers.

 

...who are MTA employees.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is stupid. These people just are stealing money from the (MTA). This needs to be stooped. It's not the (MTA)'s fault for the collision, It's the bus drivers.

 

1. The bus driver doesn't have to be at fault for the (MTA) to be considered legally liable for someones injury. If anything, an employee doesn't even have to be involved for the MTA to be considered liable depending on the incident.

 

2. Since the article is vague on the details of both incidents, I am very curious as to how you came to the conclusion that the bus driver(s) were at fault.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lol... That's a dangerous thing to say around these parts... :eek:

 

 

YES DANGEROUS INDEED! Why is it alway sthe drivers fault? Shit happens sometimes.... but it not always the drivers fault! :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's kind of ridiculous to automatically assume that the driver is at fault. It's not so easy when you've got dummies all around you!

 

In Flushing, people get "sucked" underneath buses that are making turns all the time. Now how does that happen?! It's people that aren't paying attention and refuse to give buses the right of way, so they wind up meeting their demise!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, it's kind of ridiculous to automatically assume that the driver is at fault. It's not so easy when you've got dummies all around you!

 

In Flushing, people get "sucked" underneath buses that are making turns all the time. Now how does that happen?! It's people that aren't paying attention and refuse to give buses the right of way, so they wind up meeting their demise!

 

Or even worse, a bus is parked/stationary and they're running towards it and end up tripping/slipping and ending up under the bus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.