Jump to content
Attention: In order to reply to messages, create topics, have access to other features of the community you must sign up for an account.
Sign in to follow this  
Dhurdle

Ideas for some of the train lines

Recommended Posts

am I wrong? you really think a lot of these fantasy suggestions which dont take into account the actual track layout or the difficulty of constructing new lines are better?

 

I don't think these fantasies are better but the system can use some very needed improvements.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There should be a sticky thread or a separate board where fantasy-related discussions *fictional routes, extensions, etc.) would go.

 

I've been a supporter of that idea for the main reason that I'm getting sick and tired of seeing these fantasy threads stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What the WHAT!? When do you expect the crews to rest and take comforts?? (A) to where...!?

 

What's this "rest" you talk about? You guys ain't allowed to rest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just wondering would it be a good idea to send the (C) via the (F) line From W 4 to Jay St as regular service

and if the (V) ever comes back it can teminate at WTC and the E can teminate at Hoyt Schemehorn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was just wondering would it be a good idea to send the (C) via the (F) line From W 4 to Jay St as regular service

and if the (V) ever comes back it can teminate at WTC and the E can teminate at Hoyt Schemehorn

Nope.

 

What local train would serve the Fulton line? Where would the (F) go? Why bring back the (V) and replace the (E)'s southern terminal? The current service pattern is fine the way it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nope.

 

What local train would serve the Fulton line? Where would the (F) go? Why bring back the (V) and replace the (E)'s southern terminal? The current service pattern is fine the way it is.

 

The (C) would still run on the Fulton Line. it will only run on the (F) from W4 to Jay like in the GOs

The (F) will still go down the same route i would just be adding the (C) to supplement the (F) at B'way Laff, 2 Av, Delancey, E- Bway and York

 

I changed my mind the (E) should stay at WTC and The (V) should run down the (A)(C) from w 4 st to its new terminal Hoyt-Schemehorn

 

is this a better idea or still a bad idea. Let me know

and no i'm not foaming just thinking on my keyboard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The (C) would still run on the Fulton Line. it will only run on the (F) from W4 to Jay like in the GOs

The (F) will still go down the same route i would just be adding the (C) to supplement the (F) at B'way Laff, 2 Av, Delancey, E- Bway and York

 

I changed my mind the (E) should stay at WTC and The (V) should run down the (A)(C) from w 4 st to its new terminal Hoyt-Schemehorn

 

is this a better idea or still a bad idea. Let me know

and no i'm not foaming just thinking on my keyboard

I don't know if Broadway/Lafayette could handle 3 local routes: in this case, the (C)(F) & (M). The only possible pro about it is that the Cranberry St Tunnel would no longer be clogged. However...

 

Regarding the (V), where would its northern terminal be? Hoyt-Schemehorn isn't the best terminal because there are no switches that would allow this (V) to go back towards Manhattan, seen here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.