The Real Posted September 13, 2011 Share #1 Posted September 13, 2011 http://www.ttmg.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=MTA_Regional_Bus_Destination_Sign_Codes I will continue to add the remaining codes in this order: Staten Island Subway Shuttles LIRR Shuttles Miscellaneous Queens After the NYCB Queens is installed, then I will go back and update MTAB Queens. I will not be inputting any Long Island codes. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
via White Plains Road Posted September 13, 2011 Share #2 Posted September 13, 2011 :tup::tup::tup::tup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MHV9218 Posted September 13, 2011 Share #3 Posted September 13, 2011 Please, watch the Nazi Banksters Crimes Ripple Effect at http://jforjustice.co.uk/banksters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Up Front Posted September 13, 2011 Share #4 Posted September 13, 2011 Most of the better LI codes were for the cut routes. I have seen N47s signed up as "East Meadow Loop," though... How are the subway shuttles signed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Posted September 13, 2011 Author Share #5 Posted September 13, 2011 Great to see, fantastic resource just like the rest of the wiki. General question though, does anybody have the code for M5-Greenwich Village? I've seen it a few times recently on M5s turning around at Houston Street and it's one of those flawed codes, the signs flash for about a second and then switch, also reminds me of the old M5. Its on the code sheet dude, Manhattan 8055 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IRT Bronx Express Posted September 14, 2011 Share #6 Posted September 14, 2011 Very professional and organized. :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MHV9218 Posted September 14, 2011 Share #7 Posted September 14, 2011 Please, watch the Nazi Banksters Crimes Ripple Effect at http://jforjustice.co.uk/banksters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Posted September 14, 2011 Author Share #8 Posted September 14, 2011 Ah my bad, was looking at the M5 section up top. ty Anytime! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRG Posted September 14, 2011 Share #9 Posted September 14, 2011 Most of the better LI codes were for the cut routes. I have seen N47s signed up as "East Meadow Loop," though... How are the subway shuttles signed? Subway shuttles are signed in the 9000s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aemoreira81 Posted September 14, 2011 Share #10 Posted September 14, 2011 Thanks...but question: Why does the MTA not put all of the codes into the buses (i.e., all MTA Bus codes in NYCT buses and vice versa)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q43LTD Posted September 14, 2011 Share #11 Posted September 14, 2011 Thanks...but question: Why does the MTA not put all of the codes into the buses (i.e., all MTA Bus codes in NYCT buses and vice versa)? Bus and NYCT are two different entities. They have to reprogrammed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRG Posted September 15, 2011 Share #12 Posted September 15, 2011 Not to go O/T but if (or when) the two brands get merged to form MTA Regional Bus would the MTAB express routes get renumbered with the 'X' prefix? (e.g. BxM1 becomes X71, BM5 becomes X35, etc.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SevenEleven Posted September 15, 2011 Share #13 Posted September 15, 2011 Thanks...but question: Why does the MTA not put all of the codes into the buses (i.e., all MTA Bus codes in NYCT buses and vice versa)? It's doable but the flash chip of the ODK can't hold them all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Up Front Posted September 15, 2011 Share #14 Posted September 15, 2011 That'd be a problem with routes that share numbers... What'd we do if there was NYCT's X1 and say the BM1 was turned into another X1 when the merger goes down? Since they're two different routes, it's impossible to use the letter suffix (X1a, for example). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SevenEleven Posted September 15, 2011 Share #15 Posted September 15, 2011 That'd be a problem with routes that share numbers... What'd we do if there was NYCT's X1 and say the BM1 was turned into another X1 when the merger goes down? Since they're two different routes, it's impossible to use the letter suffix (X1a, for example). It could be like the QM2A renumber to the QM20. Just use up as much empty unused routes as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric B Posted September 15, 2011 Share #16 Posted September 15, 2011 That'd be a problem with routes that share numbers... What'd we do if there was NYCT's X1 and say the BM1 was turned into another X1 when the merger goes down? Since they're two different routes, it's impossible to use the letter suffix (X1a, for example). I favored the consultant's idea to just expand the DOT-styled borough letter combination to the whole system. So X1 would become SM1; though that sounds funny, because there were no privates using SM like the other three outer boroughs had and even the Atlantic express routes used the X. So you could keep the X just for Staten Island. (Since those routes are more significant to the borough anyway). The Manhattan express routes would also keep the X. In the other boroughs, I don't think there would be a conflict, as the DOT numbers are generally low, while the X numbers are high as the low X numbers are all in Staten Island; so the X's in those boroughs could easily be changed into "-M" combinations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Posted September 15, 2011 Author Share #17 Posted September 15, 2011 I favored the consultant's idea to just expand the DOT-styled borough letter combination to the whole system. So X1 would become SM1; though that sounds funny, because there were no privates using SM like the other three outer boroughs had and even the Atlantic express routes used the X. So you could keep the X just for Staten Island. (Since those routes are more significant to the borough anyway). The Manhattan express routes would also keep the X. In the other boroughs, I don't think there would be a conflict, as the DOT numbers are generally low, while the X numbers are high as the low X numbers are all in Staten Island; so the X's in those boroughs could easily be changed into "-M" combinations. Or we could revert to the old system: X27 -> B27X However, the only issue would be the melding in the DOT Private express routes. I would just say screw it and put the BM, BxM and QM routes into the X System like this: BM1 -> NEW X32 BM2 -> NEW X33 BM3 -> NEW X34 BM4 -> NEW X35 BM5 -> NEW X36 BxM1 -> X82 BxM2 -> NEW X83 BxM3 -> NEW X84 BxM4 -> NEW X85 BxM6 -> NEW X86 BxM7 -> NEW X87 BxM8 -> NEW X88 BxM9 -> NEW X89 BxM10 -> NEW X90 BxM11 -> NEW X91 BxM18 -> NEW X92 QM1 -> NEW X50 QM2 -> NEW X51 QM3 -> NEW X52 QM4 -> NEW X53 QM5 -> NEW X54 QM6 -> NEW X55 QM7 -> NEW X56 QM8 -> NEW X57 QM10 -> NEW X58 QM11 -> NEW X59 QM12 -> NEW X60 QM15 -> NEW X61 QM16 -> NEW X62 QM17 -> NEW X65 QM18 -> NEW X66 QM20 -> NEW X67 QM21 -> NEW X69 QM24 -> NEW X70 QM25 -> NEW X71 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Via Garibaldi 8 Posted September 15, 2011 Share #18 Posted September 15, 2011 Ugh... As an express bus rider I hate the idea... I like my BM1, BM3, BM4, BxM1, BxM2, X1, X2, X9, X17J, X30, X37 and so on just the way they are. Sorry to rattle so many off, but those are some of my favourite lines to ride on or have destination signs for. I mean I can't imagine taking the BxM2 to Riverdale and it being something else. :eek: The funny thing is that most folks don't say "BM3" when referring to them. We just say, "Hey did the "3" come yet?", although some folks do say "BM3". For the "X"s I usually hear or say 1X, X1 or the 1. :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Posted September 15, 2011 Author Share #19 Posted September 15, 2011 Ugh... As an express bus rider I hate the idea... I like my BM1, BM3, BM4, BxM1, BxM2, X1, X2, X9, X17J, X30, X37 and so on just the way they are. Sorry to rattle so many off, but those are some of my favourite lines to ride on or have destination signs for. I mean I can't imagine taking the BxM2 to Riverdale and it being something else. :eek: The funny thing is that most folks don't say "BM3" when referring to them. We just say, "Hey did the "3" come yet?", although some folks do say "BM3". For the "X"s I usually hear or say 1X, X1 or the 1. :cool: Well I honestly believe when the day comes that its all one, the BM/QM/BxM days will be OVER and it will be all "X" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Via Garibaldi 8 Posted September 15, 2011 Share #20 Posted September 15, 2011 Well I honestly believe when the day comes that its all one, the BM/QM/BxM days will be OVER and it will be all "X" You think the thinks that this will better streamline things? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Posted September 15, 2011 Author Share #21 Posted September 15, 2011 You think the thinks that this will better streamline things? lol You LOL, but the renumbering to the "X" system was something that was already in the plans when the Private take over occurred. It was just placed on the backburner, for now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Via Garibaldi 8 Posted September 15, 2011 Share #22 Posted September 15, 2011 You LOL, but the renumbering to the "X" system was something that was already in the plans when the Private take over occurred. It was just placed on the backburner, for now... Yeah, I lol because I don't see why it is so necessary. What exactly is wrong with the way things are now? I mean what do they expect to gain by changing the BMs to Xs?? :confused: I don't see this making any difference in terms of ridership increases, so it seems like a waste of time to me. If anything folks would be more confused for a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Posted September 15, 2011 Author Share #23 Posted September 15, 2011 Yeah, I lol because I don't see why it is so necessary. What exactly is wrong with the way things are now? I mean what do they expect to gain by changing the BMs to Xs?? :confused: I don't see this making any difference in terms of ridership increases, so it seems like a waste of time to me. If anything folks would be more confused for a while. I'm going to explain to you one of the varying reasons why.... As RBO takes effect and everything becomes one. The biggest hurdle the MTA will face will be Destination Sign programming. The destination sign's brain can only handle so many readings. Omitting something as trivial as a BM and turning it into an X could open up so much more memory in the signs programming. This is why you have things separated now as it is, the MTAB Program and the NYCB Program can not be placed into one single program as it will not fit. The biggest problem with bus movements is the need to keep reflashing signs as buses are moved between the two entities. Think about it, use the left side of your brain just for a minute for me. Let's say MTA Regional Bus is in full swing, Bus #8080 Leaves Queens Village for Eastchester, and because the sign program is separated instead of having the bus ready to go for the next morning OR even that day, the bus has to be sidelined to be reflashed with another set of readings, BUT THEN, Eastchester looses the bus 4 days later back to Queens Village, NOW that sign has to be reflashed again and guess what, they aren't that quick to reflash stuff. NOW...with a streamlined route system, with streamlined readings where EVERY reading is in the bus. 8080 would've been from QV to EC to QV without the loss a valuable day of service because it didn't have the right sign program (MIND YOU that is tied into the farebox programming for the operator). So you see, operationally, it makes all the sense in the world have the signs all together, but we can't do it if we don't have the space....which is taken up by several signs that are using 1-2 extra characters that could be used in another form or fashion. And before you jump up and say how does one measly character matter, it does when the character is bigger than the dest readings themselves, that 1 larger character omitted could easily make way for 1-2 more full readings in terms of use of memory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRG Posted September 15, 2011 Share #24 Posted September 15, 2011 Well said Trevor! Besides, I'm sure when the time comes for MTA Regional Bus to be fully operational people would definitely be warned about the new bus route renumberings well ahead of time so there will be little confusion as possible...oh wait, I forgot people can be ignorant and don't read...oh well, let 'em wait five hours for a BM3 while X34s that essentially ARE the BM3 are going to the same place that they want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aemoreira81 Posted September 16, 2011 Share #25 Posted September 16, 2011 That'd be a problem with routes that share numbers... What'd we do if there was NYCT's X1 and say the BM1 was turned into another X1 when the merger goes down? Since they're two different routes, it's impossible to use the letter suffix (X1a, for example). The BM routes should be renumbered...I would also say that some SI routes would have to be renumbered---such as X42 to X13 and X31 to X16. I would have the routes work as follows: X1-X25: SI (X30, X31, and X42 would be renumbered to X16, X20, and X13, respectively; X17A to X18) X26-X39: Brooklyn X40-X59: Bronx X60-X89: Bronx X90-X99: Special Event Also, I would change the M15 SBS and Bx12 SBS to read only 15 SELECT - (last stop) and 12 SELECT - (last stop) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.