Cait Sith Posted March 10, 2012 Share #1 Posted March 10, 2012 Via White Plains Road & Seveneleven was with me on thursday. We didn't look for them buses...they came to us! Lets get down to business shall we? Others. It was a short day. I've noticed some of the programs changed. New signs on 1697, possibly Twinvisions? Or the previous signs before reprogramming? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
via White Plains Road Posted March 10, 2012 Share #2 Posted March 10, 2012 Twas an excellent day for fanning...... superb shots and vids! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7LineFan Posted March 10, 2012 Share #3 Posted March 10, 2012 I gotta say... leaving that little bit of the MTA stripe showing under the new wrap looks pretty nifty. Obviously unintentional, but looks good nonetheless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilbluefoxie Posted March 10, 2012 Share #4 Posted March 10, 2012 awesome work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aemoreira81 Posted March 10, 2012 Share #5 Posted March 10, 2012 Nice catch of 1732---and I was surprised to run into it today (I thought I had seen 1835 and not 1732 at first). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Up Front Posted March 10, 2012 Share #6 Posted March 10, 2012 When did you guys get there? I was there from around 2:45 to 3:10 PM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cait Sith Posted March 10, 2012 Author Share #7 Posted March 10, 2012 When did you guys get there? I was there from around 2:45 to 3:10 PM. ....wow...about 30-45 minutes after that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m7zanr160s Posted March 10, 2012 Share #8 Posted March 10, 2012 Nice stuff. :tup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aemoreira81 Posted March 10, 2012 Share #9 Posted March 10, 2012 Not bad. But I wonder if NICE should drop the N designation and just use route numbers (i.e., 1, 2, 6, 6X, 15, etc.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty24 Posted March 10, 2012 Share #10 Posted March 10, 2012 Excellent:):tup::tup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GojiMet86 Posted March 10, 2012 Share #11 Posted March 10, 2012 Cool pics and vids! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted March 10, 2012 Share #12 Posted March 10, 2012 Wow, very NICE photos. 1697 definitely has a different sign and I like how "NICE BUS" is in bold font, not like the way "LI BUS" was on destination signs. And on that N24, it says Mitchel Field "CHAS". Whats "CHAS"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cait Sith Posted March 10, 2012 Author Share #13 Posted March 10, 2012 Wow, very NICE photos. 1697 definitely has a different sign and I like how "NICE BUS" is in bold font, not like the way "LI BUS" was on destination signs. And on that N24, it says Mitchel Field "CHAS". Whats "CHAS"? Short for Charles (they screwed up on that one). Charles Lindbergh Blvd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted March 10, 2012 Share #14 Posted March 10, 2012 Short for Charles (they screwed up on that one). Charles Lindbergh Blvd. Was that the (MTA)'s fault? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilbluefoxie Posted March 10, 2012 Share #15 Posted March 10, 2012 theres signs on Meadowbrook Parkway that say Chas Lindberg Blvd as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cait Sith Posted March 10, 2012 Author Share #16 Posted March 10, 2012 Was that the (MTA)'s fault? Nope, this program was made after the takeover. A fault made by N.I.C.E/Veolia. theres signs on Meadowbrook Parkway that say Chas Lindberg Blvd as well Ah, that explains that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IRT Bronx Express Posted March 11, 2012 Share #17 Posted March 11, 2012 Excellent pics. :tup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanTheTransitMan Posted March 12, 2012 Share #18 Posted March 12, 2012 Nice (god this is such a stupid overused cliche but w/e) to see that you are posting in the NICE bus section. Good work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4P3607 Posted March 12, 2012 Share #19 Posted March 12, 2012 lol, NICE BUS! :tup::tup::tup::tup: photos! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N6 Limited Posted March 13, 2012 Share #20 Posted March 13, 2012 Not bad. But I wonder if NICE should drop the N designation and just use route numbers (i.e., 1, 2, 6, 6X, 15, etc.) People in the area are too used to the prefixes. Also, being that it goes into other counties with bus prefixes, the "N" helps distinguish buses visually and when verbally communicating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7LineFan Posted March 13, 2012 Share #21 Posted March 13, 2012 People in the area are too used to the prefixes. Also, being that it goes into other counties with bus prefixes, the "N" helps distinguish buses visually and when verbally communicating. Just playing devil's advocate here, but other than the BxM4C I've not seen a single Bee-Line bus that uses a prefix on the sign. Of course, because Transit uses them, they can be distinguished pretty easily, paint scheme aside... You do have a valid point though, in that there's no point changing since people are used to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N6 Limited Posted March 13, 2012 Share #22 Posted March 13, 2012 I must admit I've thought about that also. Were the prefixes added by MSBA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VWM Posted April 5, 2012 Share #23 Posted April 5, 2012 nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeystoneRegional Posted April 6, 2012 Share #24 Posted April 6, 2012 Nice stuff, or shall I say N.I.C.E. stuff, lols! Surely plenty of Orange in sight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.