Jump to content

Questions about the (1) train


Recommended Posts

Posted

Had to use the (1) train today up in Washington Heights for a tutoring session and was wondering about 168th, 181st & 191st street? I believe someone said that those are the deepest stations in the system (correct me if I'm wrong), but I've always wondered what happens if those elevators stopped working? I'm kind of amazed that they actually seem in pretty good working order considering how much use they must get.

 

Also how come the (A) train doesn't involve any elevators at 168th street?


Posted

Had to use the (1) train today up in Washington Heights for a tutoring session and was wondering about 168th, 181st & 191st street? I believe someone said that those are the deepest stations in the system (correct me if I'm wrong), but I've always wondered what happens if those elevators stopped working? I'm kind of amazed that they actually seem in pretty good working order considering how much use they must get.

 

There are emergency stairs.

 

Also how come the (A) train doesn't involve any elevators at 168th street?

 

 

Um, it's not deep enough...

Posted

There are emergency stairs.

 

 

 

Um, it's not deep enough...

 

 

I thought I've seen some around, but I would imagine it would take forever to get out, or are those elevators just that slow??

 

Also why were those three stations built so deep that they require an elevator to begin with??

Posted

I thought I've seen some around, but I would imagine it would take forever to get out, or are those elevators just that slow??

 

Also why were those three stations built so deep that they require an elevator to begin with??

 

 

The IRT was built so the whole line was level. Manhattan has hills in Inwood & Fort George, so that's why those stations are deep. That's also why there is a viaduct at 125 Street.

Posted

Not just that 125th Street is a fault line. It hasn't be active recently but it is dormant. So an earthquake can come out of there, but it hasn't yet.

Posted

I actually have to agree with VG8. Why would they build them so deep? I mean, they would have to rip the ground up back in the day with no tunneling machines, build it closer to the surface.

Guest Lance
Posted

The stations were built that deep to keep the grading relatively the same across the board. It's also why the 125 St/Broadway station is so high up away from the street. If the builders were to keep the stations close to the surface, the tracks would have to dip, dive and climb to match the terrain in the neighborhoods the lines travel through.

Posted

I actually have to agree with VG8. Why would they build them so deep? I mean, they would have to rip the ground up back in the day with no tunneling machines, build it closer to the surface.

 

 

They actually used a tunnel shield, they ripped up no ground...

Posted

The stations were built that deep to keep the grading relatively the same across the board. It's also why the 125 St/Broadway station is so high up away from the street. If the builders were to keep the stations close to the surface, the tracks would have to dip, dive and climb to match the terrain in the neighborhoods the lines travel through.

 

 

Yeah I was actually wondering about 125th street too... I don't see how they have the walls so low at that station towards the end of the platform... Not a good idea IMO... I saw some kids looking over the wall down there... Anywho, so how is it then that the (A) train isn't built the same way up there?? I would think that line would also be affected by the steep hills up there as well...

Posted

Yeah I was actually wondering about 125th street too... Okay fine, so how is it then that the (A) train isn't built the same way up there?? I would think that line would also be affected by the steep hills up there as well...

 

 

Because, the IND didn't wan't to have a similar elevator situation. Also, 168th is 4 tracks, and sheilds back then couldn't hold a four-track station. 190th on the (A) is quite deep.

Posted

Because, the IND didn't wan't to have a similar elevator situation. Also, 168th is 4 tracks, and sheilds back then couldn't hold a four-track station. 190th on the (A) is quite deep.

 

 

So what set up do they have at 190th street then and what set up existed on the (1) in the past? They always had elevators?

Posted

So what set up do they have at 190th street then and what set up existed on the (1) in the past? They always had elevators?

 

 

Yes, there were always elevators. At 190, there is a huge ramp down to the (A) platform. Why don't you go see the station for yourself?

Posted

Yeah I was actually wondering about 125th street too... I don't see how they have the walls so low at that station towards the end of the platform... Not a good idea IMO... I saw some kids looking over the wall down there... Anywho, so how is it then that the (A) train isn't built the same way up there?? I would think that line would also be affected by the steep hills up there as well...

 

I won't lie, I wouldn't go past the full wall section of that platform. That's a pretty long way to fall if one were to lose consciousness or was pushed off. But I do love the station for photo ops, both on the ground and on the platform. Do only problem is the boringness of it being just 1 train type running on it.
Posted

181st on the (A) is also quite deep aswell. But to answer your original question, there are quite a few elevators at each station. Not sure if you just started riding the (1), but they do infact breakdown. I wouldn't say frequently, but probably about one a year. IMO the MTA should replace them... They're very slow, sometimes stop midway, break down once a year, and have no A/C. Meh at least they can support 30 people. It really needs too.

Posted

When the IRT was built, the trains were still in "motor-trailer" configurations, the changes in grade would have been very heard for them to cope with when you only had half the train generating tractive effort.

Posted

181st on the (A) is also quite deep aswell. But to answer your original question, there are quite a few elevators at each station. Not sure if you just started riding the (1), but they do infact breakdown. I wouldn't say frequently, but probably about one a year. IMO the MTA should replace them... They're very slow, sometimes stop midway, break down once a year, and have no A/C. Meh at least they can support 30 people. It really needs too.

 

 

I think 190th is another one, for those going to Fort Washington Avenue. Not Bennette Ave. (Thats a long tunnel)

Posted

I won't lie, I wouldn't go past the full wall section of that platform. That's a pretty long way to fall if one were to lose consciousness or was pushed off. But I do love the station for photo ops, both on the ground and on the platform. Do only problem is the boringness of it being just 1 train type running on it.

 

 

lol... I was thinking the exact same thing yesterday while waiting for the doors to close at that station. I said no way in hell would I wait in those areas. It doesn't take much to go over. One misstep in fact. The thing about the new renovations at some of the elevated stations is they're too open in that regard, having the spacing and such between the walls.

 

181st on the (A) is also quite deep aswell. But to answer your original question, there are quite a few elevators at each station. Not sure if you just started riding the (1), but they do infact breakdown. I wouldn't say frequently, but probably about one a year. IMO the MTA should replace them... They're very slow, sometimes stop midway, break down once a year, and have no A/C. Meh at least they can support 30 people. It really needs too.

 

 

I've used those stations off and on over the years, but only when I feel like offering private tutoring lessons up there. Select areas of Washington Heights is tolerable so I'll go if the area is okay. Just started up there again a few weeks ago. I guess my main gripe is the whole elevator thing. I find them rather annoying because you have people constantly running to get on so they don't miss the train, holding everyone else up who is also trying not to miss the train. lol They should offer other options to get into those stations.

 

I can barely tolerate being in them for the short time that I'm in them but I can't imagine being in one and it breaking down. <_<

Posted

I can barely tolerate being in them for the short time that I'm in them but I can't imagine being in one and it breaking down. <_<

 

 

 

You just wait.

Posted

You just wait.

 

 

lol... I'll only be tutoring up there for another 5 weeks or so, so maybe if I decide to offer private sessions when school starts up again... Probably likely since I get $45.00 a session.

Posted

lol... I'll only be tutoring up there for another 5 weeks or so, so maybe if I decide to offer private sessions when school starts up again... Probably likely since I get $45.00 a session.

 

 

1. I love how you you refer to Washington Heights as "up there" when you live in Riverdale.

2. Oh well in that case, you probably won't get stuck. Only happens to daily riders there. *typically*

3. In a worst case scenario you can always take the Bx7.

Posted

1. I love how you you refer to Washington Heights as "up there" when you live in Riverdale.

2. Oh well in that case, you probably won't get stuck. Only happens to daily riders there. *typically*

3. In a worst case scenario you can always take the Bx7.

 

 

1. lol... I said "up there" because I usually prep and such in my office in Midtown and then hop on the train to go up to Washington Heights, hence my "up there" comment.

2. I hope I don't get stuck. Wasdworth Av where my private session is up by 190th street is rather civilized, but St. Nicholas Av...Noisy and filthy... The sooner I get back Downtown the better. I always dress down (by my standards), but I always get a look like what is this guy doing around here? Either that or they're wondering if i'm Dominican or not. They always practically whisper around me in Spanish. lol I try to pretend that I don't speak it, but since some think I'm Dominican that's hard to do.

3. lol... Not happening. I'd just cancel my session. Taking the subway over there is okay, particularly the (1) train with the colleges and such, but there is no way I would take the Bx7... Not only is that line unreliable from what I've seen but way overcrowded. Would be nice if they had MetroNorth or something up there rather than just the subway.

Posted

Had to use the (1) train today up in Washington Heights for a tutoring session and was wondering about 168th, 181st & 191st street? I believe someone said that those are the deepest stations in the system (correct me if I'm wrong), but I've always wondered what happens if those elevators stopped working? I'm kind of amazed that they actually seem in pretty good working order considering how much use they must get.

 

Also how come the (A) train doesn't involve any elevators at 168th street?

 

- You get stuck there & wait for help to arrive, just like any other elevator.... Part of the reason I'm not too fond of elevators (in general) to begin with.... I do everything in my power to avoid getting off a stop where the elevator is the only permissable way to get to street level (got stuck in the elevator at clark st (2)(3) little over 10 yrs. ago)....

 

Anyway, I'm not sure if they still do this, but there used to be elevator operators at 168th...

When I go to this place I get my caps from (in Wash. Hgts), I take the (1) to dyckman & walk back towards the 190's.....

 

 

- As for that last question, it's because the 1 is deeper than the (A)(C)... A/C passengers have the stairs to walk up, just like at any other underground station.... the elevators are much more necessary to get to/from the (1).....

 

 

 

Either that or they're wondering if i'm Dominican or not. They always practically whisper around me in Spanish. lol I try to pretend that I don't speak it, but since some think I'm Dominican that's hard to do.

If I had a nickel for every chick that thought I was dominican, let's just say I wouldn't be sittin here posting on forums....

 

The men, well I don't care what the hell they think.... they're not my target of interest.

I do get the scowls at times from them when I'm walkin along St. nick' or Broadway & they notice their (meaning, dominican) chicks givin me the eye......

Posted

- You get stuck there & wait for help to arrive, just like any other elevator.... Part of the reason I'm not too fond of elevators (in general) to begin with.... I do everything in my power to avoid getting off a stop where the elevator is the only permissable way to get to street level (got stuck in the elevator at clark st (2)(3) little over 10 yrs. ago)....

 

Anyway, I'm not sure if they still do this, but there used to be elevator operators at 168th...

When I go to this place I get my caps from (in Wash. Hgts), I take the (1) to dyckman & walk back towards the 190's.....

 

 

- As for that last question, it's because the 1 is deeper than the (A)(C)... A/C passengers have the stairs to walk up, just like at any other underground station.... the elevators are much more necessary to get to/from the (1).....

 

I believe few weeks ago I transferred there to get the (1) train and there was a lady there operating the elevator... Not sure why they're needed for? Is it that hard to press a button??

 

 

 

If I had a nickel for every chick that thought I was dominican, let's just say I wouldn't be sittin here posting on forums....

 

The men, well I don't care what the hell they think.... they're not my target of interest.

I do get the scowls at times from them when I'm walkin along St. nick' or Broadway & they notice their (meaning, dominican) chicks givin me the eye......

 

 

lol... Well the dudes and some chicks think I am, be it Dominican or otherwise. In fact some insist which gets me irritated. Had that crap happen to me in Italy once with this Italian dude... <_< What's fun is doing the tour of the Latin American countries... Venezuelan?? No... Colombian?? No... Brazilian? No (yes I know Brazil is not a "Latin American country per se, but I'm including it in the example to make things simple). And we go on and on... Some folks assume that I'm like born here but of Hispanic descent. Usually I just get the where are you from?? I've even been asked if I was Arabic and I've met Moroccans in Italy who thought I was Moroccan and since I do understand some French they'd try to talk to me in French. Only in Italy did folks usually ask if I was Italian or American or what, but in Sicily where my father's family is from, they thought I was from close by near Palermo, but obviously mixed. Always interesting to hear the responses I get when traveling around to various countries and such. I would expect to get American, but with me traveling around so much and speaking various languages and then my look and how I dress and all it isn't so evident.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.