Jump to content

Attention: In order to reply to messages, create topics, have access to other features of the community you must sign up for an account.
Sign in to follow this  
RPTA

Why did the Bombardier Innovia APM 200 flop?

Recommended Posts

The Bombardier Innovia APM 200 was designed by Bombardier to better compete with the Mitsubishi Crystal Mover. However, the Mitsubishi Crystal Mover continued to outsell it even after it was released. For example, longtime Bombardier customer Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport chose the Crystal Mover over the Innovia APM 200 for the ATL SkyTrain.

 

Currently, there are only two installations worldwide for the Innovia APM 200: the SkyLink APM at DFW Airport, and the Terminal 5 APM at London Heathrow Airport. A third installation is under construction at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport.

 

Last year, Bombardier introduced the Innovia APM 300, and the Innovia APM 200 was only introduced six years earlier in 2005. So, I think it is safe to call the Innovia APM 200 a flop, considering that Bombardier already came out with a successor and the fact that the Mitsubishi Crystal Mover greatly outsold it. Hopefully Bombardier can have greater success with the Innovia APM 300.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.