Jump to content

Why are Path trains smaller than NYC trains and Metro North trains Bigger?


kingal11234

Recommended Posts


Does anybody no why path trains are smaller than NYC trains?. Why are Metro North trains bigger?

 

 

Some NYC subway trains are the same size as Metro-North trains, but most regional railroad services like Metro-North use 75' cars or longer. I believe that PATH was built to use smaller subway cars, like the numbered lines of the NYC subway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you meant newer, Nova. :)

 

MNCR and LIRR and other railroads have substantially more clearance, and can run wider and longer cars than subway trains. The PATH, much like the A division, CTA, and Boston Blue/Orange lines were built in a time when the standard railcar was shorter and narrower than it is today. Boston pioneered the widebodied transit car with the opening of the Red line, and the BMT roughly copied their dimensions when they built their subways. (SIR and what is now the SEPTA Broad line and Patco in turn copied the BMT's designs.)

 

By the way, neither PATH nor SIRT are FRA compliant. PATH has received numerous waivers, and SIRT is no longer an FRA Railroad at all, and has not been for over 20 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest MTA Bus

PATH trains cars are 51 feet long, the same length as the cars on the IRT. However, PATH trains are 7 and 8 cars long, which are 357 and 408 feet. The IRT uses 10 and 11 car trains, which are 510 and 561 feet long. LIRR/MNRR uses 85 feet trains. So, a 6 car train of M7s are 510 feet, the same length of a IRT 10 car train.

 

PATH is a subway... :) for putting this in the right forum

 

 

PATH is a railroad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.