Cait Sith Posted November 8, 2012 Share #1 Posted November 8, 2012 We got 1300s up in this bitch now, WTF! Credits to Orion (member of NYCTF) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Via Garibaldi 8 Posted November 8, 2012 Share #2 Posted November 8, 2012 lol... Takes balls to use 13 with anything... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted November 8, 2012 Share #3 Posted November 8, 2012 Another stupid renumbering! Those are good pics, what depot is that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FamousNYLover Posted November 8, 2012 Share #4 Posted November 8, 2012 I wonder why starting with 13th? Don't superstitious people don't want 13th? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark1447 Posted November 8, 2012 Share #5 Posted November 8, 2012 I wonder why starting with 13th? Don't superstitious people don't want 13th? 13 to me is just a regular number. I could careless for it being superstitious... I don't even believe in that crap anyways... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metro CSW Posted November 8, 2012 Share #6 Posted November 8, 2012 Oh for Orion's sake......! lol But seriously this does not surprise me one bit. But wait a minute. By the look of the license plate, well If I could make a guess....... 1300 use to be a 526x. If I'm wrong tell me, I'm just pointing it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N4 Via Merrick Rd Posted November 8, 2012 Share #7 Posted November 8, 2012 Oh so water is wet the sky is high. this isn't surprising to me the does weird things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
error46146 Posted November 8, 2012 Share #8 Posted November 8, 2012 That's Eastchester depot. For the superstitious people, 666 has been scrapped. As of now that number will not be re-used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NovaLFSSeeker Posted November 8, 2012 Share #9 Posted November 8, 2012 Wow the 1300's..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gtNovaBusRTS9369 Posted November 8, 2012 Share #10 Posted November 8, 2012 There goes the possiblity of 1290+ for the second batch of the LFSA's. Way to express your intelligence . Wait a Minute...They were never that intelligent in the first place! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orion VII 4 Life Posted November 8, 2012 Share #11 Posted November 8, 2012 I didn't take those pics, but that's real interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ciboii22 Posted November 8, 2012 Share #12 Posted November 8, 2012 I didn't take those pics, but that's real interesting. He wasn't referring to you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ttcsubwayfan Posted November 8, 2012 Share #13 Posted November 8, 2012 Aren't the R62s numbered in the 1300 series? Or does the MTA use the same numbers for both buses and subways? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chargerdodge9 Posted November 8, 2012 Share #14 Posted November 8, 2012 The uses two different numbering systems for the different modes of transport. I must say though, this is getting on my nerves . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cait Sith Posted November 8, 2012 Author Share #15 Posted November 8, 2012 He wasn't referring to you... Correct, I was referring to the original! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbo19 Posted November 8, 2012 Share #16 Posted November 8, 2012 There goes the possiblity of 1290+ for the second batch of the LFSA's. Way to express your intelligence . Wait a Minute...They were never that intelligent in the first place! With that said, how long are these "1300's" expected to last. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtattrain Posted November 8, 2012 Share #17 Posted November 8, 2012 I think that one of those buses might be an ex-1000-series units; there was a 1000-series unit where one of those pics were taken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted November 8, 2012 Share #18 Posted November 8, 2012 For the superstitious people, 666 has been scrapped. As of now that number will not be re-used. Too bad, 666 was one hell of a bus! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T J Trainman Posted November 8, 2012 Share #19 Posted November 8, 2012 Oh for goodness sakes smh. First its 4704 to 4709 and now 1300-13XX? Any one know how high the #s are going? Wow......just wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MHV9218 Posted November 8, 2012 Share #20 Posted November 8, 2012 So these are D60s that were retired, are now in storage, and have now been renumbered? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4P3607 Posted November 9, 2012 Share #21 Posted November 9, 2012 Nice pics, but why the hell did they re-number retired D60's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cait Sith Posted November 9, 2012 Author Share #22 Posted November 9, 2012 Nice pics, but why the hell did they re-number retired D60's? They're not retired, they are in storage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtattrain Posted November 9, 2012 Share #23 Posted November 9, 2012 Nice pics, but why the hell did they re-number retired D60's? Same thing with the 4700-series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jdog14 Posted November 9, 2012 Share #24 Posted November 9, 2012 My head hurts from all the renumbering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RailBus63 Posted November 9, 2012 Share #25 Posted November 9, 2012 Nice pics, but why the hell did they re-number retired D60's? Maybe it's to clear the way for new LFSA's without having to dispose of the old D60HF's first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.