aemoreira81 Posted January 23, 2013 Share #1 Posted January 23, 2013 Curious: which numbers (3 or 4 digits) have never been used by the the New York City Transit Authority, the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, or MTA Bus Company for buses? (Never used does not include numbers proposed to be used but for which units were scrapped.) In addition, what is the latest that any number has been used for the first time? This is born out of something I saw online that number 3493 has been used only twice. The one that comes to my mind most easily is bus 1859, and I don't believe that 990-995 and 999 have ever been used. I also believe that 996-998 have been used one time only. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SevenEleven Posted January 23, 2013 Share #2 Posted January 23, 2013 We used 995/999 on a LFS demo: http://ttmg.org/pages/volvo/nymta-novad.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgood6195 Posted January 24, 2013 Share #3 Posted January 24, 2013 Curious: which numbers (3 or 4 digits) have never been used by the the New York City Transit Authority, the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, or MTA Bus Company for buses? (Never used does not include numbers proposed to be used but for which units were scrapped.) In addition, what is the latest that any number has been used for the first time? This is born out of something I saw online that number 3493 has been used only twice. The one that comes to my mind most easily is bus 1859, and I don't believe that 990-995 and 999 have ever been used. I also believe that 996-998 have been used one time only. Are you not including LI bus? Because some of those numbers you listed were used in Nassau. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GojiMet86 Posted January 24, 2013 Share #4 Posted January 24, 2013 What about #9999? I know #9998 came close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SevenEleven Posted January 24, 2013 Share #5 Posted January 24, 2013 What about #9999? I know #9998 came close. 9999 was the Orion V CNG that was renumbered to 8582. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aemoreira81 Posted January 24, 2013 Author Share #6 Posted January 24, 2013 Are you not including LI bus? Because some of those numbers you listed were used in Nassau. I am not including MSBA/Long Island Bus, which takes out the high 900s at MSBA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewFlyer 230 Posted January 24, 2013 Share #7 Posted January 24, 2013 Did the MTA ever use #100? What buses had the 700's before the MTA bus Orion V CNG's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aemoreira81 Posted January 24, 2013 Author Share #8 Posted January 24, 2013 Did the MTA ever use #100? What buses had the 700's before the MTA bus Orion V CNG's? Twice...for the preserved GMC New Look 5301 and for a Grumman 870 (both had orders that started with a single-digit bus numbered 1). The 700s were used previously for the same batch of 870s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RailBus63 Posted January 24, 2013 Share #9 Posted January 24, 2013 I wouldn't count MSBA/MTA Long Island Bus - they made no effort to avoid duplicating numbers that were already being used by NYCT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Far Rock Depot Posted January 24, 2013 Share #10 Posted January 24, 2013 the only thing safe to say is hit the 5-digit range with the exception of demo buses in the 90s and the first batch of Orion V's in 1993. There were two demo's in 92 that used 92xxx. One was a Neoplan Artic tested on the M15 and the other was the MCI demo that lead to the first batch of OTR's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgood6195 Posted January 24, 2013 Share #11 Posted January 24, 2013 What had #800-989 before the 1998-2000 New Flyer C40LFs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtattrain Posted January 24, 2013 Share #12 Posted January 24, 2013 What had #800-989 before the 1998-2000 New Flyer C40LFs? Some of the Grumman 870s were numbered from 800-910. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgood6195 Posted January 24, 2013 Share #13 Posted January 24, 2013 Some of the Grumman 870s were numbered from 800-910. Okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
limitednyc Posted January 24, 2013 Share #14 Posted January 24, 2013 1002-1099 hasn't been useded i years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Far Rock Depot Posted January 24, 2013 Share #15 Posted January 24, 2013 1002-1099 hasn't been useded i years. By the New Flyer D60s. I believe the fishbowls of the 70s USED these too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
limitednyc Posted January 24, 2013 Share #16 Posted January 24, 2013 By the New Flyer D60s. I believe the fishbowls of the 70s USED these too. the 60's began 1101 later 5350 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MHV9218 Posted January 24, 2013 Share #17 Posted January 24, 2013 Nope, the D60s that ran up until a year ago were 1000-1109. This is a decent question (mad anorak-y though haha) but my guess is just about everything has been used at least once in the past 70 years. Better to go by decades, I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooklynBus Posted January 24, 2013 Share #18 Posted January 24, 2013 Did the MTA ever use #100? What buses had the 700's before the MTA bus Orion V CNG's? Twice...for the preserved GMC New Look 5301 and for a Grumman 870 (both had orders that started with a single-digit bus numbered 1). The 700s were used previously for the same batch of 870s. Technically, New Look 100 does not count because that was pre-MTA. (1959). I remember Bus 200 of the New Look. It must have been some sort of test because I only saw it once on the B46 and never again. It was unlike all other New Looks at the time. All seats except the six behind the driver were forward facing. They may even have had soft seating. the rear door was in four parts like the old Macks, not two like all the other New Looks. Most unusual was that it was the only bus painted blue on the outside, not green like all the others. I've always wondered about that bus and don't think anyone else remembers it but me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgood6195 Posted January 24, 2013 Share #19 Posted January 24, 2013 Technically, New Look 100 does not count because that was pre-MTA. (1959). I remember Bus 200 of the New Look. It must have been some sort of test because I only saw it once on the B46 and never again. It was unlike all other New Looks at the time. All seats except the six behind the driver were forward facing. They may even have had soft seating. the rear door was in four parts like the old Macks, not two like all the other New Looks. Most unusual was that it was the only bus painted blue on the outside, not green like all the others. I've always wondered about that bus and don't think anyone else remembers it but me. MTA was created in 1953. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
limitednyc Posted January 24, 2013 Share #20 Posted January 24, 2013 4703-4709 when were they last used Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtsbusman1997 Posted January 24, 2013 Share #21 Posted January 24, 2013 On the 1987 TMC RTS order. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MHV9218 Posted January 24, 2013 Share #22 Posted January 24, 2013 4703-4709 when were they last used Literally two months ago, 4704-4709 all were in service. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fresh Pond Posted January 25, 2013 Share #23 Posted January 25, 2013 ^^^ Co-sign... vvv Took this in October...or November, forgot. All I know it was cold outside lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbo19 Posted January 25, 2013 Share #24 Posted January 25, 2013 01-99. Highly unlikely to be used, but I'd be laughing if the next NBQP fleet (90 buses) were numbered in that range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtattrain Posted January 25, 2013 Share #25 Posted January 25, 2013 01-99. Highly unlikely to be used, but I'd be laughing if the next NBQP fleet (90 buses) were numbered in that range. More like 1-89; 1-99 is 100 buses lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.