The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 (2009 film)

[mark1447 685]

Any1 gonna watch it in 2009?

 

More here

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Taking_of_Pelham_1_2_3_(2009_film)

 

Bases on the 1970s version

Edited August 29, 2008 by mark1447
Fixed URL

[Pierre 0]

Definitely. If it's good. Backed by a good director and multiple good actors, but the writer has some question marks and that's what matters most.

 

P.S. - You gave us the wrong link. Go here.

[Fred G 63]

I'm not a big fan of remakes, but I'll watch it since I really enjoy the original.

[trainfan22 1,782]

I hate that they used an R62 made it look like an 142. It looked horrable they should have used an redbird or an normal looking R62/A.

[Brighton Local 702]

I think ALL theatres will be filled with Transit Buffs, the night it comes out..:eek: The sign in all theatres acoss the the Tri-State Area will read:

 

"CAUTION: Slippery Floors, due to Massive Foaming".

 

 

Zachary

[Pablo M 201 35]

I'll be watching it. I make sure I go the movie theater, I know foamers won't go to. H00ray for out of NY options!

 

BTW, here is the IMDB page on it.

 

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1111422/

 

Check it every once and then.....

 

I think ALL theatres will be filled with Transit Buffs, the night it comes out..:eek: The sign in all theatres acoss the the Tri-State Area will read:

 

"CAUTION: Slippery Floors, due to Massive Foaming".

 

 

Zachary

ROFL!

[metsfan 2]

Mite be fun to see at the amc 25 in times square.

 

-

[7LineFan 254]

I hate that they used an R62 made it look like an 142. It looked horrable they should have used an redbird or an normal looking R62/A.

 

Well the whole point of the film, besides remaking the story, is to paint a new image of the subway (to outsiders), i.e. showcasing the NTTs, and there are no single unit NTTs so this is what they did for the scene where the first car breaks off the train. Of course when we see it we'll be able to tell.

[mark1447 685]

I wounder if this will be based on the R142As, rather then an Old R33

Btw I fixed the Wiki page link

[via White Plains Road 192]

I think ALL theatres will be filled with Transit Buffs, the night it comes out..:eek: The sign in all theatres acoss the the Tri-State Area will read:

 

"CAUTION: Slippery Floors, due to Massive Foaming".

 

 

Zachary

 

LMAO:p:D

[7LineFan 254]

I wounder if this will be based on the R142As, rather then an Old R33

Btw I fixed the Wiki page link

 

That's the thing. They're using R142As for this film, which do not come in single cars, hence the R62 "NTT".

[mark1447 685]

That's the thing. They're using R142As for this film, which do not come in single cars, hence the R62 "NTT".

 

 

Maybe also they wont use R142As, unless the production pays High. Since these cars were recently Built (around 2001-2003). Maybe the MTA will allow an older car, R62? or the original R22 from the movie of 1973

[R1Toasty 0]

I'll certainly go and see it the first night it's out . Anyway, guys, it's been said many times that they're using an R62 made to look like an R142 (and it's pretty good, I've seen pictures).

[N-Trizzy2609 11]

Tell you the truth, it's not that bad. I'll call it the R162!!! lol. But seriously, it's really not that bad

[7LineFan 254]

Maybe also they wont use R142As, unless the production pays High. Since these cars were recently Built (around 2001-2003). Maybe the MTA will allow an older car, R62? or the original R22 from the movie of 1973

 

They can't... they've already filmed the subway car parts apparently.

 

Anyway, guys, it's been said many times that they're using an R62 made to look like an R142 (and it's pretty good, I've seen pictures).

 

I say put that thing back into service as is... with the exception of the controls of course, those have to be restored. Would make a nice anomaly against the R62A monotony.

[INDman 413]

The pics of the converted R62 looks great. They even painted the yellowish panels in the cab. I don't think that it would look all that bad if R62s were rebuilt like that. The one thing I don't get is what looks like an operators console on the off side end of the cab. There is even a strip map too.

[mark1447 685]

They can't... they've already filmed the subway car parts apparently.

 

 

u must of seen in a Documentary ? cuz thats weird =\

[Queens Surface 434]

Dam that modified R62 looks nice , I wonder if the MTA will really do that

[mark1447 685]

I'll certainly go and see it the first night it's out B). Anyway, guys, it's been said many times that they're using an R62 made to look like an R142 (and it's pretty good, I've seen pictures).

 

 

wow didnt notice this, its HOT! B) Imagine seeing a R62 for normal service like that... Hope I see it at TA Museum~~

 

Is the train at Westchester yard?

[RTD1 0]

HELL NO!

 

You dont remake a masterpiece.

 

The first attempted remake for ABC in the 90's was an atrocity in itself.

[Pablo M 201 35]

wow didnt notice this, its HOT! B) Imagine seeing a R62 for normal service like that... Hope I see it at TA Museum~~ B)

 

Is the train at Westchester yard?

Its going back into service, but not like that. The movie studio paid to have the R62A look like that, and they're paying to put it back to normal for service again.

[mark1447 685]

Its going back into service, but not like that. The movie studio paid to have the R62A look like that, and they're paying to put it back to normal for service again.

 

But wouldnt that cause a Delay on the Lex Line? Unless its taken late night or some other line

[Pablo M 201 35]

But wouldnt that cause a Delay on the Lex Line? Unless its taken late night or some other line

Why would it cause a delay on the Lexington Avenue line?

 

They probably did move it around late nights.

[Blackmanor1000 0]

I don't know if it'll be a good movie. A lot of remakes of good movies turn out to be not good. I'm just going to see because my uncle was an extra. He may not even be in the movie if they decided to cut out a part where he was shown.

[N-Trizzy2609 11]

Y'all better kiss mine and Trevor Logan's butt for this!!!

 

http://www.subchat.com/read.asp?Id=619701