Jump to content

Attention: In order to reply to messages, create topics, have access to other features of the community you must sign up for an account.
TransitJusticeForAll

De Blasio wants streetcar line on Brooklyn-Queens waterfront

Recommended Posts

Good! This project has few (if any) benefits. This same amount of money could be put towards local matching fund for SAS Phase 2. That would be a much better use of that money. Or put it towards doing Triboro RX.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if Amazon wants to spend its own money on this streetcar - and not expect “Amazon” Cuomo or “Amazon” de Blasio to spend taxpayer money - then I might be okay with that.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.rtands.com/passenger/rapid-transit-light-rail/vhb-lands-contract-for-environmental-review-of-proposed-brooklyn-queens-connector/

 

Quote

VHB lands contract for environmental review of proposed Brooklyn Queens Connector

February 06, 2019

Written by Paul Conley, Editor-in-Chief

BQX-755x402.jpg

 

A proposal to build the Brooklyn Queens Connector, a streetcar line linking the New York City boroughs of Brooklyn and Queens, took a step toward reality today as the city’s Economic Development Corporation approved a key contract.

VHB Engineering, Surveying, Landscape Architecture and Geology, P.C., an architecture, engineering, and environmental consulting firm, won a contract of up to $7.2 million to conduct an environmental review that is required before construction of can begin.

The Brooklyn Queens Connector, or BQX, would run for 11 miles along the East River waterfront, an area of the city that is underserved by other forms of public transit.  The route, which has been revised since the original 2016 study, will link Astoria in the north with Gowanus in the south via Queensbridge, Long Island City, Greenpoint, Williamsburg, Brooklyn Heights and Red Hook. An LRV facility  would need to be constructed with capacity for 40 vehicles. An overhead catenary with a 750V DC supply will be installed along the entire route.

“The BQX will link long-disconnected neighborhoods and shorten commutes for over half a million New Yorkers who live and work along the Brooklyn and Queens waterfront. It is a 21st century solution to our city’s transit challenges and we’re excited to move the project forward,” a spokesperson for the Economic Development Corporation said in a written statement.

Plans for the BQX were announced long before Amazon announced it would build its second headquarters in Long Island City, one of the neighborhoods that the streetcar would serve. Even prior to that news, the city estimated some 50,000 riders would use the line daily.

Under the terms of the contract, VHB will “prepare a comprehensive compliant environmental review” as well as helping to prepare and file applications required under the city’s Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP) rules. An environmental review that adheres to standards set by the federal National Environmental Policy Act would preserve the city’s ability to use federal funds for the construction of BQX and ensure that work meets permitting standards set by the United States Army Corps of Engineers or U.S. Coast Guard related to construction in navigable waters.

Construction of the Brooklyn Queens Connector is expected to begin in early 2024 with the line opening in mid-2029.

Adam Giambrone, the former Toronto Transit Commission chairman whom New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio had hired to develop the BQX, quit late last year to accept a job in Saudi Arabia.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yay, more money for consultants...

This proposal needs to be left to die. Like now. That 7.2 million could be much better spent on bus lanes or service increases...

  • Upvote 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, RR503 said:

Yay, more money for consultants...

This proposal needs to be left to die. Like now. That 7.2 million could be much better spent on bus lanes or service increases...

Who needs a well thought out, transportation solution when you got a hippy expensive streetcar that makes politicians and economic development companies egos bigger?

*sigh*

Edited by NoHacksJustKhaks
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies for bumping this thread but I’d like to share my thoughts on the BQX project (again). 

Here are the Facts:

• A Streetcar is proposed by DeBlasio (and his administration if I’m not mistaken) to run from Astoria to Red Hook from the Queens and Brooklyn Waterfronts 

• $7.2 Million is a waste for a Streetcar that has been Shortened. We know that. 

• That Money can be better allocated on other projects that would prove to be more productive. 

Here are my opinions: 

• I’m not sure if this is a fact or if it’s just me, but I feel like the city has some weird obsession with the Brooklyn Queens Waterfront. I would understand why because of how appealing it is and the (potential) development that it has, not to mention money. 

• The BQX is a waste. We have the (G) train, which somewhat parallels the BQX. We also have the Q69/Q100 LTD, The B32/B62 and the B61/B57. 

Better Alternatives: 

• The most obvious one is to make upgrades along the (G) line. Extending it to at least 480’ in Train length. Increased service/ Reduced Headway’s. ADA accessibility along all stops. Etc. 

• We can also consider the option of adding bus lanes along 21st Street along with Extending the Q69 down to Greenpoint Avenue/Kent Street via 44th Drive and 11th Street/McGuiness Blvd. May not be as effective, but it could give Astoria/LIC Riders along 21st Street more options, as well as serving as an alternative to the (G) north of Greenpoint Avenue. I propose this because I have some criticism against @RR503‘s (G) Train extension. Which I’ll elaborate on in a different post. 

• The last Alternative would be some tweaks in Brooklyn Bus Service. Examples would include some service increases or potential reroutes in B32, B57, B61, and B62 Service. Maybe even a revival of B71 service. I won’t go in depth with this because I don’t know the Brooklyn Bus Network that well. Maybe any Brooklynites (or any former Brooklynites on here) can shed more light on this topic. 

Edited by LaGuardia Link N Tra

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, LaGuardia Link N Tra said:

Apologies for bumping this thread but I’d like to share my thoughts on the BQX project (again). 

Here are the Facts:

• A Streetcar is proposed by DeBlasio (and his administration if I’m not mistaken) to run from Astoria to Red Hook from the Queens and Brooklyn Waterfronts 

• $7.2 Million is a waste for a Streetcar that has been Shortened. We know that. 

• That Money can be better allocated on other projects that would prove to be more productive. 

Here are my opinions: 

• I’m not sure if this is a fact or if it’s just me, but I feel like the city has some weird obsession with the Brooklyn Queens Waterfront. I would understand why because of how appealing it is and the (potential) development that it has, not to mention money. 

• The BQX is a waste. We have the (G) train, which somewhat parallels the BQX. We also have the Q69/Q100 LTD, The B32/B62 and the B61/B57. 

Better Alternatives: 

• The most obvious one is to make upgrades along the (G) line. Extending it to at least 480’ in Train length. Increased service/ Reduced Headway’s. ADA accessibility along all stops. Etc. 

• We can also consider the option of adding bus lanes along 21st Street along with Extending the Q69 down to Greenpoint Avenue/Kent Street via 44th Drive and 11th Street/McGuiness Blvd. May not be as effective, but it could give Astoria/LIC Riders along 21st Street more options, as well as serving as an alternative to the (G) north of Greenpoint Avenue. I propose this because I have some criticism against @RR503‘s (G) Train extension. Which I’ll elaborate on in a different post. 

• The last Alternative would be some tweaks in Brooklyn Bus Service. Examples would include some service increases or potential reroutes in B32, B57, B61, and B62 Service. Maybe even a revival of B71 service. I won’t go in depth with this because I don’t know the Brooklyn Bus Network that well. Maybe any Brooklynites (or any former Brooklynites on here) can shed more light on this topic. 

I'm so used to hearing about this, so I'm going to play devil's advocate for a bit.

We're always thinking of plans that we never actually build because they aren't necessary for the time period. Look at the Northern Blvd line. The growth in that area on the (7) was unprecedented, and yet while we never actually thought of building a parallel line back in the 1900s we do today because of the congestion in that area. Now, similarly, the BQX's demographics are prone to change, and perhaps the number of daily riders while increase exponentially like it did on the (7) or the (L) , say we're going to have some golden economic opportunities along the East River waterfront that we never even thought of (like Amazon HQ2 that happened recently, although that idea is gone now). In that case, we'll be wishing that we actually did build a BQX, all those years ago. 

But don't get me wrong here. I'm pissed as well that we're spending money unnecessarily on a line that already parallels the (G) , doesn't do much for Manhattan, has been shortened and simplified yet somehow costs more money, and has a cost that does not justify its current ridership. All I'm saying is that things have the potential to change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.