chenvinny54 Posted May 13, 2016 Author Share #126 Posted May 13, 2016 what about Staten Island (X) or to go their ok fine, I will just extend the to Staten Island, and put back the to Bay Ridge - 95 Street.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BDNQ2345 Posted May 13, 2016 Share #127 Posted May 13, 2016 ok fine, I will just extend the to Staten Island, and put back the to Bay Ridge - 95 Street..Yeah you can do it like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chenvinny54 Posted May 13, 2016 Author Share #128 Posted May 13, 2016 Yeah you can do it like that and also the second avenue will replace the 42nd Street shuttle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chenvinny54 Posted May 13, 2016 Author Share #129 Posted May 13, 2016 and also the second avenue will replace the 42nd Street shuttle. ...and here is a proposed map. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BDNQ2345 Posted May 14, 2016 Share #130 Posted May 14, 2016 Nice map. But what about Tribro Line (X) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Union Tpke Posted May 15, 2016 Share #131 Posted May 15, 2016 ...and here is a proposed map. that change is horrible. Do you realize that the 42nd Street shuttle is at the same level as the Lexington Avenue Line. Wonder why? Yeah, it was the original subway route. Of course it is possible with engineering to find some solution but is it worth it? No. It is better to burn money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P3F Posted May 15, 2016 Share #132 Posted May 15, 2016 that change is horrible. Do you realize that the 42nd Street shuttle is at the same level as the Lexington Avenue Line. Wonder why? Yeah, it was the original subway route. Of course it is possible with engineering to find some solution but is it worth it? No. It is better to burn money.The Lexington line is lower. When you make the transfer from the shuttle to the Lexington line, you go through a down slanted passageway and then down a set of stairs. This could probably be done in terms of the engineering, although I'd do it much differently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CenSin Posted May 15, 2016 Share #133 Posted May 15, 2016 that change is horrible. Do you realize that the 42nd Street shuttle is at the same level as the Lexington Avenue Line. Wonder why? Yeah, it was the original subway route. Of course it is possible with engineering to find some solution but is it worth it? No. It is better to burn money. Install 2 more columns of beams over the former express tracks. Remove the existing columns. Now move the tracks closer to the center and the tunnel will accommodate B division cars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chenvinny54 Posted May 15, 2016 Author Share #134 Posted May 15, 2016 Install 2 more columns of beams over the former express tracks. Remove the existing columns. Now move the tracks closer to the center and the tunnel will accommodate B division cars.Agreed. That is also meant to remove the abandoned b1 right turn tracks, add more straight ones Eastbound then you connect the right turn one to guide the Cyan to Second Avenue line, so it will go to brooklyn, via Manhattan bridge, and Brighton line via SAS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chenvinny54 Posted May 19, 2016 Author Share #135 Posted May 19, 2016 Hello guys, I had updated the . Only AM rush hours will skip-stop Mets - Willets Point since most of the trains, except trains departing Flushing from 9:00, coming out from Main Street are crowded or to save some space to serve heck lot of waiting commuters @ Junction Blvd and Woodside - 61 Street. So, departing Flushing - Main Street before 9 AM shall be addressed as Super Express trains, serving Junction Blvd and Woodside the quick rides to Manhattan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beelinefan Posted May 20, 2016 Share #136 Posted May 20, 2016 Hello guys, I had updated the . Only AM rush hours will skip-stop Mets - Willets Point since most of the trains, except trains departing Flushing from 9:00, coming out from Main Street are crowded or to save some space to serve heck lot of waiting commuters @ Junction Blvd and Woodside - 61 Street. So, departing Flushing - Main Street before 9 AM shall be addressed as Super Express trains, serving Junction Blvd and Woodside the quick rides to Manhattan. Why did you replace the 42nd st shuttle with a uneeded w extension? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chenvinny54 Posted May 20, 2016 Author Share #137 Posted May 20, 2016 Why did you replace the 42nd st shuttle with a uneeded w extension?A shuttle is not enough, and also w is needed to be extended for improved service. will be the new express shuttle between brooklyn via Brighton line to Times Square 42 street, via SAS line running only weekdays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beelinefan Posted May 20, 2016 Share #138 Posted May 20, 2016 You do realize that there is no money for almost all of these dumb proposals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chenvinny54 Posted May 20, 2016 Author Share #139 Posted May 20, 2016 You do realize that there is no money for almost all of these dumb proposals.No please dont say that. Some of them are wanted by union tpke and other, BDNQ2345 had accepted them, and I proposed it and CenSin had agreed with me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P3F Posted May 20, 2016 Share #140 Posted May 20, 2016 You do realize that there is no money for almost all of these dumb proposals. You do realize that this is his own proposal thread and not all proposals have to be 100% realistic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chenvinny54 Posted May 20, 2016 Author Share #141 Posted May 20, 2016 You do realize that this is his own proposal thread and not all proposals have to be 100% realistic? Yes this map, i expected to be realistic. Then if you see some flaws you will tell me which proposal you want to erase, like Union Tpke did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P3F Posted May 20, 2016 Share #142 Posted May 20, 2016 Yes this map, i expected to be realistic. Then if you see some flaws you will tell me which proposal you want to erase. Not really a flaw, but personally I don't see a reason to just end the at Canal Street if you're extending it south. It could go south to Chambers Street and the World Trade Center (and maybe the South Ferry loops, but some trains would have to short turn somewhere if that was done.) Also, would there be a use for an extension of the east from Lefferts Boulevard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beelinefan Posted May 20, 2016 Share #143 Posted May 20, 2016 Yes this map, i expected to be realistic. Then if you see some flaws you will tell me which proposal you want to erase. what iwant to see erased: All of the proposed v service the j to staten island t to the bronx q 125th cross town n to the rockaways all k service b to ave u a to the bronx d to co op city W returned to astoria to whitehall via broadway 3 and 4 returned to their current brookyln terminals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chenvinny54 Posted May 20, 2016 Author Share #144 Posted May 20, 2016 Not really a flaw, but personally I don't see a reason to just end the at Canal Street if you're extending it south. It could go south to Chambers Street and the World Trade Center (and maybe the South Ferry loops, but some trains would have to short turn somewhere if that was done.) Also, would there be a use for an extension of the east from Lefferts Boulevard? Foe the , yeah agreed, will be moved down to South Ferry Loop transferring to ., will not be extended to Leffert Blvd, only takes that branch, since there are not many commuters accessing there. Only from the Rockaway, is mostly crowded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P3F Posted May 20, 2016 Share #145 Posted May 20, 2016 Foe the , yeah agreed, will be moved down to South Ferry Loop transferring to . , will not be extended to Leffert Blvd, only takes that branch, since there are not many commuters accessing there. Only from the Rockaway, is mostly crowded. I meant a physical extension of the Liberty Avenue Line, regardless of which train you assign to it. Maybe it could meet with the at Foch Boulevard? Just some of my thoughts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chenvinny54 Posted May 20, 2016 Author Share #146 Posted May 20, 2016 I meant a physical extension of the Liberty Avenue Line, regardless of which train you assign to it. Maybe it could meet with the at Foch Boulevard? Just some of my thoughts.Maybe not. I dont think union tpke wants that. It is not needed to transfer to another train there, each have a one seat ride to the corresponding streets in manhattan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CenSin Posted May 20, 2016 Share #147 Posted May 20, 2016 You do realize that there is no money for almost all of these dumb proposals. Clearly, this thread has a huge disclaimer: MY final subway line proposals. He basically owns the thread and it’s his fantasy proposal. Three-quarters of the discussions wouldn’t be happening on this forum if cost was a reason to shut down all discourse. Adhering to your standard, the the MTA should have never released a fantasy map of the 2 Avenue Line since money for phases 3 and 4 are likely to never materialize. But great things are built because ideas came first. The quandary of funding these ideas is a job that comes later. And then there’s the unsubstantial claim that the proposal is simply dumb. It speaks of one’s own intelligence to make a claim and walk away without further details. You do notice that a majority of modifications on the map are inspired by actual proposed plans, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chenvinny54 Posted May 26, 2016 Author Share #148 Posted May 26, 2016 Ok guys, my map is not done. The SAS East will run via the Flushing Queens Bypass line, terminating at Little Neck Pkwy. The LIRR will terminating at Little Neck station temporary, transferring to the subway. If by LIRR, up to Little Neck, then fare is $7.25, from Penn Station, the only station in Manhattan, or Mets - Willets Point and $6.00 at same zone, during off peak. For peak hour rides, fare is $10.00 for Zone 1 to 3, and $8.25 for arriving at station at same zone. will ply Metro North from 138 Street in the Bronx, to Fordham Road to save money for the commuters to travel there instead of taking MNR. If by MNR to Fordham Road (Zone 2 from Grand Central Terminal), then fare will be same as express bus fare for off peak, and $8.75 for peak, both one-way. On the other hand, taking subway there is only one regular fare ($2.75) SAS, not sure. Its terminus is at 125 Street and Lexington Avenue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chenvinny54 Posted May 26, 2016 Author Share #149 Posted May 26, 2016 Ok guys, my map is not done. The SAS East will run via the Flushing Queens Bypass line, terminating at Little Neck Pkwy. The LIRR will terminating at Little Neck station temporary, transferring to the subway. If by LIRR, up to Little Neck, then fare is $7.25, from Penn Station, the only station in Manhattan, or Mets - Willets Point and $6.00 at same zone, during off peak. For peak hour rides, fare is $10.00 for Zone 1 to 3, and $8.25 for arriving at station at same zone. will ply Metro North from 138 Street in the Bronx, to Fordham Road to save money for the commuters to travel there instead of taking MNR. If by MNR to Fordham Road (Zone 2 from Grand Central Terminal), then fare will be same as express bus fare for off peak, and $8.75 for peak, both one-way. On the other hand, taking subway there is only one regular fare ($2.75) SAS, not sure. Its terminus is at 125 Street and Lexington Avenue. LIRR fare chart: http://web.mta.info/lirr/about/TicketInfo/LIRRFares03-22-15.pdf Metro North Railroad: from Grand Central Terminal http://web.mta.info/mnr/html/planning/fares/hhfares_mar2015.html Also, for and SAS East , car fleets shall be R211, same as Staten Island railroad. Sent from my SM-N9208 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chenvinny54 Posted May 26, 2016 Author Share #150 Posted May 26, 2016 LIRR fare chart: http://web.mta.info/lirr/about/TicketInfo/LIRRFares03-22-15.pdf Metro North Railroad: from Grand Central Terminal http://web.mta.info/mnr/html/planning/fares/hhfares_mar2015.html Also, for and SAS East , car fleets shall be R211, same as Staten Island railroad. Sent from my SM-N9208 using Tapatalk Or maybe, I can extend the SAS via MNR track in the Bronx, terminating at Wakefield station or the very last station in the Bronx before Westchester (out-of-NYC). Overall, on Harlem line, and SAS on Hudson line, terminating at last station of Metro North Railroad Zone 2, to cover the expensive fares for a huge flow of commuters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.