Jump to content

Attention: In order to reply to messages, create topics, have access to other features of the community you must sign up for an account.
RES2773

LIRR Third Track Project

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, RR503 said:

It should be done in the next few weeks, though the investment is moot until 3rd track allows reverse-peak trains to come from NY. 

FWIW, after the communities killed it in 2009ish, the LIRR's MO with 3rd track was to sneakily build sections of third track without anyone being the wiser. That's why all the new overpasses  in the area  have three tracks, for example. 

Honestly, it's the traditional way of doing things. Buy properties whenever they come on the market (or negotiate easements) and eventually you have enough property to do the whole thing at once.

It's how the original Penn Station was built, for example.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, bobtehpanda said:

Honestly, it's the traditional way of doing things. Buy properties whenever they come on the market (or negotiate easements) and eventually you have enough property to do the whole thing at once.

It's how the original Penn Station was built, for example.

True, though some would say that's a circumvention of the public's right to comment extensively on such issues. Bad optics, either way.

On a historical note, this method of construction wasn't all fun and games for PS. IIRC there were a few property owners who, upon understanding the centrality of their land to the PRR's plans, raised their prices astronomically, making purchase all the more difficult. Point being, sometimes it's better just to go the governmentally sanctioned route and gain eminent domain power... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/9/2018 at 11:26 PM, P3F said:

Groundbreaking? Wow, I haven't been up to date. I thought this has already been under construction for around a year now.

They were building a second track from Farmingdale to Ronkonoma

Edited by mfs NJT459

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, mfs NJT459 said:

They were building a second track from Farmingdale to Ronkonoma

No, P3F and I are talking about the Third Track. The MTA awarded the contract for the Third Track late last year and the contractor has been doing some preparatory work here and there in 2018 so far. But last week was the "official" groundbreaking for the project/Cuomo pre-election photo-op.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I took a look at the track map proposals for this project. Can anyone tell me how these flat junctions make any sense? It looks worse than the flat junction at Myrtle Avenue and 145 Street.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, CenSin said:

I took a look at the track map proposals for this project. Can anyone tell me how these flat junctions make any sense? It looks worse than the flat junction at Myrtle Avenue and 145 Street.

Link?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, bobtehpanda said:

Link?

Page 29

@CenSin is completely right. Oyster Bay and Hempstead Branch ops are both going to be severely restricted by what I can only characterize as unmitigated idiocy in the design process.

In this “modernization” plan, OB trains will only have access to the Manhattan-bound local track at Mineola, with outbound trains having to cross over to said track against the flow of traffic at an interlocking that is — get this — west of Herricks Road. I honestly can’t think of a better way to slaughter capacity.  

Similarly, because 3rd track now ends at Floral Park, the Hempstead Branch is getting screwed. Under the plan, outbound Main Line trains are seemingly using the current inbound Hempstead track all the way from QUEENS interlocking to Floral Park. Why they can’t at the very least install high speed universal crossovers between Floral Park and Bellerose is beyond me, much less assemble Floral Park so that trains use the ‘correct’ Hempstead track from the start.  

If I may express my Thanksgiving sentiments early, I’m thankful that NYCT isn’t run by the LIRR — imagine how much worse the subway would be if these loons were in charge...

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, RR503 said:

Page 29

@CenSin is completely right. Oyster Bay and Hempstead Branch ops are both going to be severely restricted by what I can only characterize as unmitigated idiocy in the design process.

In this “modernization” plan, OB trains will only have access to the Manhattan-bound local track at Mineola, with outbound trains having to cross over to said track against the flow of traffic at an interlocking that is — get this — west of Herricks Road. I honestly can’t think of a better way to slaughter capacity.  

Similarly, because 3rd track now ends at Floral Park, the Hempstead Branch is getting screwed. Under the plan, outbound Main Line trains are seemingly using the current inbound Hempstead track all the way from QUEENS interlocking to Floral Park. Why they can’t at the very least install high speed universal crossovers between Floral Park and Bellerose is beyond me, much less assemble Floral Park so that trains use the ‘correct’ Hempstead track from the start.  

If I may express my Thanksgiving sentiments early, I’m thankful that NYCT isn’t run by the LIRR — imagine how much worse the subway would be if these loons were in charge...

The saving grace is that there will be another track to route around incidents and to provide reverse-peak service. But otherwise, this design fails the capacity goal mentioned in the document.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, RR503 said:

Page 29

@CenSin is completely right. Oyster Bay and Hempstead Branch ops are both going to be severely restricted by what I can only characterize as unmitigated idiocy in the design process.

In this “modernization” plan, OB trains will only have access to the Manhattan-bound local track at Mineola, with outbound trains having to cross over to said track against the flow of traffic at an interlocking that is — get this — west of Herricks Road. I honestly can’t think of a better way to slaughter capacity.  

Similarly, because 3rd track now ends at Floral Park, the Hempstead Branch is getting screwed. Under the plan, outbound Main Line trains are seemingly using the current inbound Hempstead track all the way from QUEENS interlocking to Floral Park. Why they can’t at the very least install high speed universal crossovers between Floral Park and Bellerose is beyond me, much less assemble Floral Park so that trains use the ‘correct’ Hempstead track from the start.  

If I may express my Thanksgiving sentiments early, I’m thankful that NYCT isn’t run by the LIRR — imagine how much worse the subway would be if these loons were in charge...

It has been clear for some time that they want to turn the Oyster Bay Branch into a shuttle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Union Tpke said:

It has been clear for some time that they want to turn the Oyster Bay Branch into a shuttle.

Hell, if it doesn’t go between Port Washington, Huntington, Ronkonkoma or Babylon and Manhattan, the LIRR will dump it like a hot potato. See: the platform F project, the lack of service in diesel territory, and their “what’s that” treatment service-wise of FR/HP/WH/OB/LB

Edited by RR503
I seem to have forgotten what the word "and" means...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/10/2018 at 1:10 PM, RR503 said:

It should be done in the next few weeks, though the investment is moot until 3rd track allows reverse-peak trains to come from NY. 

FWIW, after the communities killed it in 2009ish, the LIRR's MO with 3rd track was to sneakily build sections of third track without anyone being the wiser. That's why all the new overpasses  in the area  have three tracks, for example. 

Fiendishly clever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/17/2018 at 4:22 PM, Italianstallion said:

Fiendishly clever.

Also not completely unprecedented.

The MTA owned all the land already needed for the Ronkonkoma Double Track project. They also own pretty much enough land to double track Port Jeff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.