paolo999 Posted January 23, 2018 Share #1 Posted January 23, 2018 Possible dodgy blame attributed to Con Ed aside, would it be more cost effective / reliable for the MTA to have it’s own power generation? Upsides: It would be a second source, which would give the MTA long term leverage in negotiating power supply deals. Whether be on price, or SLA. Downsides: A distraction. Big capital expenditure when other possible projects already have people clamouring for them to be implemented. (Or is it even legally possible? I know some US jurisdictions forbid municipalities from competing with companies, in certain sectors) (admins... if this should be in the random thoughts thread, please merge) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.