Jump to content

MTA: Amtrak demands stalling Metro-North plan to open Manhattan's West Side to Westchester


paulrivera

Recommended Posts

On 10/28/2018 at 2:25 PM, RailRunRob said:

Pelham Parkway for sure!! Seems they had in on the plan, in the beginning, I wonder that changed? Funding? 

0rE65S8.png

What is this plan? Its horrific! People lose direct New Haven Line access from Fordham, I dont know what's serving Mount Vernon East to New Rochelle, Hudson Line customers lose access to GCT, I dont know what's serving Spyten to 125th. Please no!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, Lawrence St said:

What is this plan? Its horrific! People lose direct New Haven Line access from Fordham, I dont know what's serving Mount Vernon East to New Rochelle, Hudson Line customers lose access to GCT, I dont know what's serving Spyten to 125th. Please no!

Initial plans from 2000-2002. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Lawrence St said:

What is this plan? Its horrific! People lose direct New Haven Line access from Fordham, I dont know what's serving Mount Vernon East to New Rochelle, Hudson Line customers lose access to GCT, I dont know what's serving Spyten to 125th. Please no!

This would increase service, not decrease. Additional New Haven Line service would go to Penn, and ADDITIONAL Hudson Line service would go to Penn. Penn Station Access will be the most cost effective large Capital Project, using existing lines and adding stations allows passengers in the East and West Bronx better access to Manhattan and opens up reverse commuting. I hope they fund Hudson Line PSA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
2 hours ago, 40MntVrn said:

I'm assuming with theyll be retrofitted with the adjustable shoe?

Some M8s won’t need to be retrofitted at all as there are ~60 new cars next year which should have dual compatible shoes.

Theres also one final ~30 car option still on the table that can be used to help get this service started.

Metro-North and CT played it really smart with the M8 contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RR503 said:

If they can work through the cab signal issue, they should also consider through running trains from Croton to, say, Ronkonkoma with the Hudson phase. Same agency, (almost) same rolling stock...

I would have them run through to Hempstead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This wonderful tidbit from Signal Problems:

Quote

Well, yes! But: one of the hold-ups was Amtrak wanted the MTA to pay for replacing the century-old Pelham Bay Bridge which it argued could not accommodate the heavier load. Here’s WNYC on how they solved that impasse:

> Under the agreement brokered by Cuomo, the Pelham Bay Bridge replacement would be postponed for 10-20 years. 

Short of Andrew Cuomo standing outside the MTA headquarters and kicking a can of “What The L” Blue Point lager down Broadway, this is about as close to the literal manifestation as “kicking the can down the road” as you’ll find.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 1/26/2019 at 1:48 PM, bobtehpanda said:

This wonderful tidbit from Signal Problems:

 

The MTA should agree to fund a portion of grade-separating SHELL Interlocking, but has refused.

40489627743_45f745f963_b.jpg

Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 8.31.19 AM by Union Turnpike, on Flickr

40489627693_a6c752e72f.jpgScreen Shot 2019-03-24 at 8.31.25 AM by Union Turnpike, on Flickr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Union Tpke said:

@RR503 It sounds like they are evaluating options for a new yard for PSA in New York; perhaps an expansion of New Rochelle Yard?

Wish I knew for certain. MNR, to me, is a strange land. If I had to guess this'd involve incremental changes to existing facilities, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎3‎/‎24‎/‎2019 at 9:28 AM, Union Tpke said:

perhaps an expansion of New Rochelle Yard

At first, I was wondering what New Rochelle Yard you were talking about, but I guess they consider those three layup tracks northeast of the New Rochelle station a yard. On the subject of a potential expansion, I don't see where MN would get the space for it. The entire ROW in that area is sandwiched between private property and new developments on one side and I-95 on the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really speaking, the NHL is fast approaching the limitations of its mainline railroad infrastructure. Yards are great, but until you grade separate the junctions and terminals, simplify stopping patterns and install high density signals, the same basic capacity limits will remain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/25/2019 at 8:59 PM, RR503 said:

Really speaking, the NHL is fast approaching the limitations of its mainline railroad infrastructure. Yards are great, but until you grade separate the junctions and terminals, simplify stopping patterns and install high density signals, the same basic capacity limits will remain. 

The MTA should pay for part of the grade-separation of Shell Interlocking. When I asked someone working on PSA via email they said that they had just done some improvements there. Grade-separating the junction at Stamford should be done as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.