Jump to content


Attention: In order to reply to messages, create topics, have access to other features of the community you must sign up for an account.
Union Tpke

Original Archer Service Plan N/G to Jamaica Center, G shuttle to Van Wyck Blvd late nights

Recommended Posts

@RR503

The original service pattern planned for Archer Avenue was bizarre. There is not much known about it, but this is what I know. The plan was created about 1985-no signage with the (R) was put up. If any of you know anything about this, let me know. I am trying to get the Archer Avenue lines wikipedia article to become a good article, and would really appreciate a source better than what one person said on NYCTF and subchat. Thanks and enjoy.

Presumed service pattern

(E)(F) to 179th Street

(N)  to Jamaica Center Weekdays, 57th Street or Forest Hills other times

(G) to Forest Hills Weekdays

    to Jamaica Center Evenings and Weekends

   shuttle from Van Wyck Blvd to Jamaica Center, Queens Plaza to Smith/9th Streets late nights

Operations

(G) trains would have relayed using the Jamaica Yard leads. This would have complicated operations in the AM rush.

detail-71-cont.png

Signage

  • At Union Turnpike - Under tape on Northbound local track, one place tape removed (Seen 1986)
  • At Forest Hills
  • At Grand Avenue- Under tape on platform sign on Northbound track reading "Late nights for Parsons/Archer take (F) local to Van Wyck Blvd for (G)"."
  • At Briarwood - G sticker covered 2007-If accurate, this would likely still be there. Might have been for the old (G) to 179th Street service pattern during late nights, which can be seen under a sign at Continental.
  • At 67th Avenue
  • At 75th Avenue

Rollsigns

roll.jpg

roll3.jpg

Sources:

https://www.nyctransitforums.com/topic/21852-archer-avenue/

http://www.subchat.com/readflat.asp?Id=1263688

http://www.subchat.com/readflat.asp?Id=1339776

http://www.subchat.com/read.asp?Id=718514

http://www.subchat.com/readflat.asp?Id=1339776&p=2

http://www.subchat.com/readflat.asp?Id=1152828&p=2

http://www.subchat.com/readflat.asp?Id=1152828&p=2

Edited by Union Tpke
fix typo
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad they changed that plan up, because Kew Gardens would have faced overcrowding issues. 
My only grip about the Archer Ave extension is that the services should have been extended to 168th Street where the original (J) terminated. I feeling like there is a void on that side of Jamaica Ave and the bus routes have to make up for that.  

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, NewFlyer 230 said:

Glad they changed that plan up, because Kew Gardens would have faced overcrowding issues. 
My only grip about the Archer Ave extension is that the services should have been extended to 168th Street where the original (J) terminated. I feeling like there is a void on that side of Jamaica Ave and the bus routes have to make up for that.  

Agreed. I heard that the original plan was to send the (J) as far as 190th Street in Hollis while the (E) went on the LIRR right of way to Laurelton. 

The TA execs at the time most of been smoking some good stuff if they thought sending the (G) to Jamaica Center was acceptable, especially given how well-utilized the Archer Ave stations are today. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The original (G)(N) Archer plan definitely didn’t make sense, especially given that connecting riders were already traveling substantial distances on the bus. Requiring  them to transfer from the (G)(N) to the (E)(F) for express service would have been creating another Roosevelt Avenue at Union Turnpike. It was much better that they rerouted the (E) to Archer and have one less transfer needed. 

Though it really would have been better if they could have built even just one more stop at Merrick Blvd to connect with the many bus routes that run through there. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I shudder to think of what would have happened at 75 Ave under this plan. (E)s or (F)s would have had to merge with (N) there -- that'd have been chaos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(G) from Smith-9 to Jamaica (N) from Coney to Jamaica are loops to outdo the  (M)! Those are bizarre service patterns if I've ever heard of them, but I sort of get a kick out of it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, MHV9218 said:

(G) from Smith-9 to Jamaica (N) from Coney to Jamaica are loops to outdo the  (M)! Those are bizarre service patterns if I've ever heard of them, but I sort of get a kick out of it. 

Yup. I would really love to see the signs for this!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Imagine this with the 63 St connector... I don't think the (V) would have ever existed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, bobtehpanda said:

@Union Tpke JFYI but I believe Photobucket has a limit to how much data you can share for a time period.

You can only image host 25MB of photos now IIRC. If you have more than that, the stupid watermark thing comes up until you take some down or something. Real PITA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/5/2019 at 5:21 PM, Union Tpke said:

@RR503

Signage

  • At Union Turnpike - Under tape on Northbound local track, one place tape removed (Seen 1986)
  • At Forest Hills
  • At Grand Avenue- Under tape on platform sign on Northbound track reading "Late nights for Parsons/Archer take (F) local to Van Wyck Blvd for (G)"."
  • At Briarwood - G sticker covered 2007-If accurate, this would likely still be there. Might have been for the old (G) to 179th Street service pattern during late nights, which can be seen under a sign at Continental.
  • At 67th Avenue
  • At 75th Avenue

p=2

Let's not forget the (E)(F)(G)(N) sign on the Interboro (Jackie Robinson) Pkwy exits. which are unused and darkened, (forgot if the signs are still visible).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Eric B said:

Let's not forget the (E)(F)(G)(N) sign on the Interboro (Jackie Robinson) Pkwy exits. which are unused and darkened, (forgot if the signs are still visible).

Are there any pictures of that sign? I have looked while passing by while going under via Union Tpke, but never have enough time to see the sign. There is never traffic on Union Tpke under Queens Boulevard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Union Tpke said:

Are there any pictures of that sign? I have looked while passing by while going under via Union Tpke, but never have enough time to see the sign. There is never traffic on Union Tpke under Queens Boulevard.

The sign on the west side is decently visible (above the set of doors), but I haven't seen any such signs on the east side (which has the glass block wall). In traffic on either Union Turnpike or the Parkway, it probably wouldn't be too hard to take a photo, although you'd need a camera that's good in low light situations.

Edited by P3F

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, P3F said:

The sign on the west side is decently visible (above the set of doors), but I haven't seen any such signs on the east side (which has the glass block wall). In traffic on either Union Turnpike or the Parkway, it probably wouldn't be too hard to take a photo, although you'd need a camera that's good in low light situations.

I can see the outlines of the sign, and part of it where it says Union Turnpike, when in a car, but not much more. Since there never is traffic there, I can't take a photo of the sign.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.