What Would Be The Weirdest Train On a Route?

[Luis1985]

R62 on the

R62A on the

R142 on the

R142A on the

[MTR Admiralty]

R62 on the

R62A on the

R142 on the

R142A on the

 

The 4 runs R142As.

[Luis1985]

The 4 runs R142As.

 

my mistake. i meant R62/R62A on the .

[MTR Admiralty]

my mistake. i meant R62/R62A on the .

Ha, they used to run them recently.

[PelhamExpress6]

R142 on the

R142A on the

R143 on the

R46 on the

R160 on the (

[2 Train Master]

R32(J)

R40S/M(V)

R42(S)

R44(

R46(

R62??

R68(E)

R142(7)

R142A(1)

R143©-8car

R160A/B???

[2 Train Master]

R62 on the

R62A on the

R142 on the

R142A on the

R62/A is same thing except company.

R142 ran on the temporary for no confusion,they run on the .

R142A's run on the from time to time,run on the ,they run on the(5) from time to time and the was for video(Taking Of Pelham123) and testing

[MTR Admiralty]

R142 on the

R142A on the

R143 on the

R46 on the

R160 on the (

They tested the R160B on the B before.

I would say it would be weird if they show up on the in service.

[engineerboy6561]

Weirdest Train Assignments:

 

: R142A

: R110A

: R143

(: R110B

[Urbanfortitude]

R62/R62As on the

 

Sorry that's all I could think of. I feel like I seen it all before.

 

Anyway for all the people who said R142/As on the I actually think that would be kinda sweet.

[MTR Admiralty]

R62/R62As on the

 

Sorry that's all I could think of. I feel like I seen it all before.

 

Anyway for all the people who said R142/As on the I actually think that would be kinda sweet.

Wow... Division A equipment on Division B trackage, in revenue service? Now that's something.

[Urbanfortitude]

of course...i was thinking about that way before i saw this topic.

[MTR Admiralty]

How about this:

SIRT R44s on the B, N, Q and W.

[Jashawn R.]

The ntt shot was a reprogrammed as a as a g.o.

[ctrain]

OK so

(1)R -142

(7)r-142

©R-160

(A)R143

[R421969]

I know this is off topic, but i heard that the R1-9 would be briught back a few years ago and put on the 7 line, because the 7 line used to be BMT. Only what i heard, its interesting because the r1-9 making a return? thats like bill russell lacing it back up and joining the big three for a season...and the fact that the 7 used to be BMT? any opinions on any of this; for I only heard it from a transit buff...

[7LineFan]

I know this is off topic, but i heard that the R1-9 would be briught back a few years ago and put on the 7 line, because the 7 line used to be BMT. Only what i heard, its interesting because the r1-9 making a return? thats like bill russell lacing it back up and joining the big three for a season...and the fact that the 7 used to be BMT? any opinions on any of this; for I only heard it from a transit buff...

 

R1-9? Not possible.

 

The north of QBP used to be operated jointly by the IRT and BMT, along with the Astoria line () north of QBP. Both lines used cars to IRT specs. After the became solely IRT, and the Astoria solely BMT, they widened the Astoria to BMT specs, but since the was still IRT, they didn't widen it. The Arnines can't fit.

 

Whoever told you that would happen doesn't know his subway history.

[R421969]

R1-9? Not possible.

 

The north of QBP used to be operated jointly by the IRT and BMT, along with the Astoria line () north of QBP. Both lines used cars to IRT specs. After the became solely IRT, and the Astoria solely BMT, they widened the Astoria to BMT specs, but since the was still IRT, they didn't widen it. The Arnines can't fit.

 

Whoever told you that would happen doesn't know his subway history.

 

Yeah I guess so, because the person said the signals on the 7 line were BMT fitted and that they were shortned when the 7 became only IRT, just like you said. If this was at all possible, you ever heard of the arnies being brought back? I didnt know which one was more crazier; the return of R1-9 class cars or the 7 line being BMT at one point.

[7LineFan]

Yeah I guess so, because the person said the signals on the 7 line were BMT fitted and that they were shortned when the 7 became only IRT, just like you said. If this was at all possible, you ever heard of the arnies being brought back? I didnt know which one was more crazier; the return of R1-9 class cars or the 7 line being BMT at one point.

 

What do you mean about them being brought back? Permanently?

[MTR Admiralty]

I know this is off topic, but i heard that the R1-9 would be briught back a few years ago and put on the 7 line, because the 7 line used to be BMT. Only what i heard, its interesting because the r1-9 making a return? thats like bill russell lacing it back up and joining the big three for a season...and the fact that the 7 used to be BMT? any opinions on any of this; for I only heard it from a transit buff...

Technically infeasible, the platforms must be trimmed back in order to fit those cars without damaging them. While Arnines and BMT subway stock (as opposed to BMT Q cars) could fit in the tracks, the platforms must be shaved off in order for this to happen.

 

That's an illegitimate reason, that the Flushing line was BMT. the Flushing line was run under the Dual Contracts by the IRT and the BMT. R1-R9s are not BMT cars, they were City cars. During the unification process and especially when the R10s arrived, Arnines began to make appearances on the BMT South lines.