Eric B Posted January 19, 2009 Share #26 Posted January 19, 2009 Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.0; en-us; dream) AppleWebKit/525.10+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Mobile Safari/523.12.2) It has been said many times, but perhaps a good solution is the M/V merger. The M is merged with the V using the Chrystie Street Connection and that the W could be extended to Bay Parkway to replace lost service during rush hours. Given these times, however, I am not sure if the MTA is willing to approach this. I would suggest that if they were considering eliminating the . But since they didn't, then they probably don't want to reduce it to 8 cars either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty Posted January 19, 2009 Share #27 Posted January 19, 2009 Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.0; en-us; dream) AppleWebKit/525.10+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Mobile Safari/523.12.2) I would suggest that if they were considering eliminating the . But since they didn't, then they probably don't want to reduce it to 8 cars either. Yeah true, but if they did, that would be a good plan. The line in jeopardy is the W. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.