Jump to content

<4><5>


Recommended Posts


Heh, well, it's kind of redundant to have the 5 in Brooklyn a diamond service. After all, it's not an express version of itself.

 

Doesn't matter....it was better than way having a <5> b/c it was a Bronx Thru Express to/from 3rd Avenue-149th Street and East 180th Street and limited rush hour service to Nereid Avenue-238th Street and rush hours service to Brooklyn College-Flatbush Avenue!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't matter....it was better than way having a <5> b/c it was a Bronx Thru Express to/from 3rd Avenue-149th Street and East 180th Street and limited rush hour service to Nereid Avenue-238th Street and rush hours service to Brooklyn College-Flatbush Avenue!

 

The Diamond 5 in the Bronx makes sense though.

@Dx Local- the 7 uses diamonds, not just during rush hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No the 11 Was a Circle... Or better Yet Move The Dead (9) to the <7>

 

There is no need for redesignation. The current set up has a few flaws, but they are generally understandable. If the 7 extends and branches into 2 distinct routes in Queens, then yes, there will be justification for a separate service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i mean i just dont think it shoule be like that (7)<7> i mean if its like that then whay not (A)<(A)> one express and one local .

do you get what im trying to say?

 

Because the (7)<7> both use the whole route... the (C) only uses most, not all of the (A) route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.