R44 5278 Posted April 13, 2009 Share #26 Posted April 13, 2009 No,not really.both the R160A's and R160B's can be found on both divisions. Actually, when I said dominate I actually meant majority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe C Posted April 13, 2009 Share #27 Posted April 13, 2009 Actually, when I said dominate I actually meant majority. R160A's- The lines that the R160A's are on. R160B's- The lines that the R160B's are on. both are only on 2 IND lines(1 if you only count the E)while the rest are BMT lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maddog Posted April 13, 2009 Share #28 Posted April 13, 2009 Cool pics! Slight OT, but what exactly is burn testing and how is this performed on R160's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kawasaki3 Posted April 13, 2009 Share #29 Posted April 13, 2009 there should be plan for mta nyct subway that: R160 should go to , line. kawasaki is almost finish building the R160's. so i would say. the next 140 cars of R160b should go to line. 140 cars will replace R40slant on line. line have capability to become CBTC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kawasaki3 Posted April 13, 2009 Share #30 Posted April 13, 2009 or you would perfer that jamaica give up it R32 or R42. send all of them to pitkin /207 street yard. R32/ R42 will replace R40slant. then where would 140cars of R160b will go to which line.? give it to or , . if 140cars R160B go to . line would give up it R68 and send them line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kawasaki3 Posted April 13, 2009 Share #31 Posted April 13, 2009 the next car number of 130 R160A should be) #9593 - #9722 built by kawasaki. ( #9593 - #9722 was car number of R36WF) R.I.P R36WF 1959 - 2005 #9593 - #9722 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kawasaki3 Posted April 13, 2009 Share #32 Posted April 13, 2009 we would recommemdate the R160's should use R33- R36 car number unitl the #9593 - #9722 when it complete finish building and run into service. the redbird car of number of #8570 - #9722 have been put and will be used on R160. #9593 - #9602 should go to , line. #9603 - #9722 will go to line. #9593 - #9602 will be use altsom propulsion #9603 - #9722 will be used simenis propulison #9593 - #9722 will be built by kawasaki Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kawasaki3 Posted April 13, 2009 Share #33 Posted April 13, 2009 #8570 - #8805 was used on R28 #8805 - #9305 was used on R33M #9307 - #9549 was used used on R33WF #9540 - #9559 was used on R36m #9560 - #9769 was used on R36WF the next car number of 130cars of R160's ( that going to be built) is #9593 - #9722 built by kawasaki. that will be last car number that R160's will be using that was last used R28/R29/R33/R36. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trainspot12 Posted April 13, 2009 Share #34 Posted April 13, 2009 we would recommemdate the R160's should use R33- R36car number unitl the #9593 - #9722 when it complete finish building and run into service. the redbird car of number of #8570 - #9722 have been put and will be used on R160. #9593 - #9602 should go to , line. #9603 - #9722 will go to line. #9593 - #9602 will be use altsom propulsion #9603 - #9722 will be used simenis propulison #9593 - #9722 will be built by kawasaki I heard that a lower powered R160 is in process of being made for the to run on that line. This might be a part of the second option R160 cars by Kawasaki (but can't get other details yet). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kawasaki3 Posted April 13, 2009 Share #35 Posted April 13, 2009 IF alstom finish building 360cars R160A #9233 - #9592 by june or july. mta NYCT subway going add adtional number of R160s that will be used; #9593 - #9722 was used R36WF if kawasaki finish building R160B by may. they will built the next 130 cars of R160 will be #9593 - #9722 if alstom finish builidng by june. additonal number have been or will be added. 242 cars #9593 - #9834 ( R160 #83** - #98** have been completed and built or 130 cars R160s #9593 - #9722 been built. those car number have used on R29/R36WF we added 30 more cars number to it. and we stop using the #83** - #97** number they will used differnet number. by using #2930 - #3200 series? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlmerPark B6 Posted April 13, 2009 Share #36 Posted April 13, 2009 IF alstom finish building 360cars R160A #9233 - #9592by june or july. mta NYCT subway going add adtional number of R160s that will be used; #9593 - #9722 was used R36WF if kawasaki finish building R160B by may. they will built the next 130 cars of R160 will be #9593 - #9722 if alstom finish builidng by june. additonal number have been or will be added. 242 cars #9593 - #9834 ( R160 #83** - #98** have been completed and built or 130 cars R160s #9593 - #9722 been built. those car number have used on R29/R36WF we added 30 more cars number to it. and we stop using the #83** - #97** number they will used differnet number. by using #2930 - #3200 series? The R160A wouldn't be finished by this summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pr1nyc1 Posted April 13, 2009 Share #37 Posted April 13, 2009 Awesome pics, if the (A)'s were getting these, i would cry for joy. Theyll probably give em all to Lefferts though...Bastads. They always have these though on the GO track near Broad Channel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R44 5278 Posted April 13, 2009 Share #38 Posted April 13, 2009 Guys, where's the evidence that the R160As are going to the A? I mean it would be great to have them replace the R32s, but please don't foam about these info. Besides, the E and F have yet to fill their spots with R160s. There is more of a chance that the A would get the R179s than the R160As. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R44 5278 Posted April 13, 2009 Share #39 Posted April 13, 2009 line have capability to become CBTC. The A will not become CBTC until the R44s and R46s are all off the system. And the R160Bs are definitely not going on the A since the Q will need them to bump off the remaining R68As for the G. CBTC on the A is almost impossible now that the A is used for the cars designated to be retired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maserati7200 Posted April 13, 2009 Share #40 Posted April 13, 2009 we would recommemdate the R160's should use R33- R36car number unitl the #9593 - #9722 when it complete finish building and run into service. the redbird car of number of #8570 - #9722 have been put and will be used on R160. #9593 - #9602 should go to , line. #9603 - #9722 will go to line. #9593 - #9602 will be use altsom propulsion #9603 - #9722 will be used simenis propulison #9593 - #9722 will be built by kawasaki dude, are that guy kgnmn? You and him had very similar posts. I haven't seen kgnmn post on this site for a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlmerPark B6 Posted April 13, 2009 Share #41 Posted April 13, 2009 dude, are that guy kgnmn? You and him had very similar posts. I haven't seen kgnmn post on this site for a while. That's what I thought, but I never said anything, or else people would think I'm stalking or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maserati7200 Posted April 13, 2009 Share #42 Posted April 13, 2009 That's what I thought, but I never said anything, or else people would think I'm stalking or something. Hey, I'm not a stalker... I stumble upon a post that reminds me of that guy kgnmn who had I remember had pretty much the same posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlmerPark B6 Posted April 13, 2009 Share #43 Posted April 13, 2009 Hey, I'm not a stalker... I stumble upon a post that reminds me of that guy kgnmn who had I remember had pretty much the same posts. I'm not saying you're a stalker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty Posted April 13, 2009 Share #44 Posted April 13, 2009 IF alstom finish building 360cars R160A #9233 - #9592by june or july. mta NYCT subway going add adtional number of R160s that will be used; #9593 - #9722 was used R36WF if kawasaki finish building R160B by may. they will built the next 130 cars of R160 will be #9593 - #9722 if alstom finish builidng by june. additonal number have been or will be added. 242 cars #9593 - #9834 ( R160 #83** - #98** have been completed and built or 130 cars R160s #9593 - #9722 been built. those car number have used on R29/R36WF we added 30 more cars number to it. and we stop using the #83** - #97** number they will used differnet number. by using #2930 - #3200 series? Holy Jesus Christ, aren't you kngmn? What's your next handle? Alstom4? Okay, judging from the datasheet that I edit, Kawasaki should finish earlier than Alstom. Alstom is not even halfway there (close, but no cigar). And I have NO idea where you get those numbers from. Who knows? Maybe we won't use those numbers... it's up to RTO. Please give us information that has fact and proof behind it, not just any speculation, because then it ignites all sorts of problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty Posted April 13, 2009 Share #45 Posted April 13, 2009 I'm not saying you're a stalker. Okay, we ALL are not stalkers. Settled? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan Railer Posted April 14, 2009 Share #46 Posted April 14, 2009 I heard that a lower powered R160 is in process of being made for the to run on that line. This might be a part of the second option R160 cars by Kawasaki (but can't get other details yet). wonder what the constraint is... shouldn't be the salt water, or is it... oh, and where did you hear from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R44 5278 Posted April 14, 2009 Share #47 Posted April 14, 2009 wonder what the constraint is...shouldn't be the salt water, or is it... oh, and where did you hear from? That's just rubbish. The current Rockaway line is using an outdated third rail source from that of LIRR since 1957. That's why there's trouble with phase gaps along the route. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeystoneRegional Posted April 14, 2009 Share #48 Posted April 14, 2009 Please, watch the Nazi Banksters Crimes Ripple Effect at http://jforjustice.co.uk/banksters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan Railer Posted April 14, 2009 Share #49 Posted April 14, 2009 That's just rubbish. The current Rockaway line is using an outdated third rail source from that of LIRR since 1957. That's why there's trouble with phase gaps along the route. wonder why they haven't upgraded yet, maybe because they are POOR:confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FriedChikkin Posted April 14, 2009 Share #50 Posted April 14, 2009 That and maybe R160 (A)s in the future? There's already an automatic announcement in the announcements listing regarding transferring to the to get to JFK which is intended to be played only if on a Lefferts-bound train. It's last in the list, I didn't listen to it yet because the trains I were on today were in service (don't want to confuse the intelligentsia ridership). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.