MTR Admiralty Posted April 14, 2009 Share #26 Posted April 14, 2009 pay them extra You're exciting the TWU in the wrong times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DX Local Train Posted April 14, 2009 Author Share #27 Posted April 14, 2009 guess my option doesn't madder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Julio Posted April 14, 2009 Share #28 Posted April 14, 2009 guess my option doesn't madderIt's not that, you need to be realistic. The MTA right now is in a money crisis and you want to make them spend more on something that isn't needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty Posted April 14, 2009 Share #29 Posted April 14, 2009 It's not that, you need to be realistic. The MTA right now is in a money crisis and you want to make them spend more on something that isn't needed. Note: "Money crisis" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DX Local Train Posted April 14, 2009 Author Share #30 Posted April 14, 2009 ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DX Local Train Posted April 15, 2009 Author Share #31 Posted April 15, 2009 Wait Why Not Make the terminate at WTC and have the Run On the ©Line to Bklyn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maserati7200 Posted April 15, 2009 Share #32 Posted April 15, 2009 Wait Why Not Make the terminate at WTC and have the Run On the ©Line to Bklyn Uh dude, that would way too long of a ride on the Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty Posted April 15, 2009 Share #33 Posted April 15, 2009 Wait Why Not Make the terminate at WTC and have the Run On the ©Line to Bklyn They tried it before. Guess it didn't work out much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DX Local Train Posted April 15, 2009 Author Share #34 Posted April 15, 2009 Well Thats Just My Opinion i mean the Is a real long line Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LTA1992 Posted April 15, 2009 Share #35 Posted April 15, 2009 I really do not think the crews will care if the Goes via Concourse bacause of length. Come on, thats ridiculous. Look at several lines now that go their regular routes or what could happen in the future. The During its normal route makes 43 stops. Now thats Local and Express. The Late Night local makes 63 stops. The makes 44 stops along the regular route. The Local to New Lots makes 53 stops. The Local would make 50 stops. If the WERE to go via Concourse, it would have to make 46 stops. So i dont think the Crews would care.Theres worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DX Local Train Posted April 15, 2009 Author Share #36 Posted April 15, 2009 Thank You It really Wouldent madder at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty Posted April 15, 2009 Share #37 Posted April 15, 2009 I really do not think the crews will care if the Goes via Concourse bacause of length. Come on, thats ridiculous. Look at several lines now that go their regular routes or what could happen in the future. The During its normal route makes 43 stops. Now thats Local and Express. The Late Night local makes 63 stops. The makes 44 stops along the regular route. The Local to New Lots makes 53 stops. The Local would make 50 stops. If the WERE to go via Concourse, it would have to make 46 stops. So i dont think the Crews would care.Theres worse. The 2 and 4 late night runs are not frequent and they are late night only. So that is moot. There's no choice but to do that. Besides number of stations, you have to look at route mileage as well. Extending the C to Concourse means adding a lot of miles to the line. It's not much about number of stations. Yes, they would have to make a lot of announcements. It's about the operations. It would make much more sense to put the A and C together in the "North" division and the B and the D in the "South". I think a T/O or a C/R should tell us why these lines switched the northern terminals back then in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LTA1992 Posted April 15, 2009 Share #38 Posted April 15, 2009 The 2 and 4 late night runs are not frequent and they are late night only. So that is moot. There's no choice but to do that. What about in the Winter time when thats frequent because of cold weather and they have to store trains on the express tracks. YOU try sitting in a Local from 174th Street to the last stop in Brooklyn. That sucks big time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DX Local Train Posted April 15, 2009 Author Share #39 Posted April 15, 2009 The 2 and 4 late night runs are not frequent and they are late night only. So that is moot. There's no choice but to do that.Besides number of stations, you have to look at route mileage as well. Extending the C to Concourse means adding a lot of miles to the line. It's not much about number of stations. Yes, they would have to make a lot of announcements. It's about the operations. It would make much more sense to put the A and C together in the "North" division and the B and the D in the "South". I think a T/O or a C/R should tell us why these lines switched the northern terminals back then in the first place. yea Right We need a T/O to settle this once and for all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty Posted April 15, 2009 Share #40 Posted April 15, 2009 What about in the Winter time when thats frequent because of cold weather and they have to store trains on the express tracks. YOU try sitting in a Local from 174th Street to the last stop in Brooklyn. That sucks big time. Does this happen EVERYDAY? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DX Local Train Posted April 15, 2009 Author Share #41 Posted April 15, 2009 No Im Just Trying To Get people to under stand my opinion like i under stand theres Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlmerPark B6 Posted April 15, 2009 Share #42 Posted April 15, 2009 No Im Just Trying To Get people to under stand my opinion like i under stand theres But can you just use correct grammars, then it would be better for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DX Local Train Posted April 15, 2009 Author Share #43 Posted April 15, 2009 So please tell me what im saying wrong cause i really dont under stand what im saying wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlmerPark B6 Posted April 15, 2009 Share #44 Posted April 15, 2009 So please tell me what im saying wrong cause i really dont under stand what im saying wrong? "No Im Just Trying To Get people to under stand my opinion like i under stand theres" You see theres is supposed to be their. "Thank You It really Wouldent madder at all" Wouldn't, matter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DX Local Train Posted April 15, 2009 Author Share #45 Posted April 15, 2009 your telling me if i miss a comma or a ' its a big deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Julio Posted April 15, 2009 Share #46 Posted April 15, 2009 Can we stop with the attacks at DX Local? No one here is perfect. Let's keep this on topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlmerPark B6 Posted April 15, 2009 Share #47 Posted April 15, 2009 your telling me if i miss a comma or a ' its a big deal Just read my post above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTR Admiralty Posted April 15, 2009 Share #48 Posted April 15, 2009 "No Im Just Trying To Get people to under stand my opinion like i under stand theres" You see theres is supposed to be their. "Thank You It really Wouldent madder at all" Wouldn't, matter Okay man, this is a transit forum, not a grammar school. Regarding the topic, while the main benefit is to provide Concourse riders an option of 6th Avenue and 8th Avenue service, you have to understand why the switcheraoo was done back in the 90's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DX Local Train Posted April 15, 2009 Author Share #49 Posted April 15, 2009 Can we stop with the attacks at DX Local? No one here is perfect. Let's keep this on topic. thank you Y2Julio i mean you can still read it apparently if you could correct it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric B Posted April 16, 2009 Share #50 Posted April 16, 2009 yea Right We need a T/O to settle this once and for all Already did: http://www.nyctransitforums.com/forums/showpost.php?p=107758&postcount=11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.