Jump to content

Emil

Senior Member
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Emil

  1. 33 minutes ago, trainfan22 said:

    It probably went to the spur track between Canal and Chambers street, changed ends and went to 207th street to get repaired.

     

     

    BTW, I was on that same (A) train you was on. It ran along side that NIS R179 between 34th and West 4th street. That 179 going OOS left an HUGE gap in (C) service, they had to sent an (A) local along the Fulton street corridor.

    ooh okay yea going to 207 makes more sense, and yea the (C) did leave a huge gap after that disruption.

  2. Random but yesterday at 135th on the (B)(C) I was about to get on board on a R179 on the (C) and it casually went out of service due to "malfunctions" and I was confused as to where the problem was but we all got off and waited for the following (B) train afterwards.. the irony when I got on the (A) express and met up with the NIS R179 at 14th Street.

  3. On 11/16/2020 at 3:53 AM, Vulturious said:

    Aren't they still working on QBL CBTC? Regardless, 8th Av is going to need the R211s to arrive before they can start on construction since there isn't enough to really run CBTC and it would basically be useless.

    oh yes true true, they're still on that. plus with the delay of the R211s I for sure know for a fact they won't start yet.

  4. I feel like they added all the R179s on 8th avenue again because this weekend has been rolling them all out on the (A) and (C), also caught a few random R160s both Alstom and Siemens ones. Would they have sent the ones that belonged to the (F) back or at least to either pitkin or CI yards?

  5. On 3/9/2020 at 8:43 AM, T to Dyre Avenue said:

    I doubt they’ll use the 4-car R179 sets. They can’t do 10-car trains with them, and they won’t want to have trains with various lengths of eight, nine and ten cars, which would cause people on the platform to stampede towards the first or last car if the train is less than ten cars long. They might use R32s since those are paired cars, so you can make 10-car trains with no issues at all. 

    They should. I don’t know if they had it installed the last time the (M) ran up CPW. 

    They installed that program for the weekends it ran along CPW, it features the new woman that announces the M14SBS transfers

  6. 3 hours ago, YungMarxian said:

    What’s a free program I can use to edit a subway map? I want to make a “fantasy” map (parentheses on fantasy because I’m not making one of those ridiculous maps with lines spanning almost a hundred stops, just some ideas on deinterlining, changing some service patterns, a few modest extensions and one new trunk line). 

     

    I used MS Paint to varied successes when I used a windows computer, but now I have a mac, so MS paint is no longer an option. Thanks!

    literally same!! I've been feening to make another one, it's been forever 

  7. On 2/22/2020 at 12:00 PM, Bill from Maspeth said:

    Since you saw that car later on back in service, that should tell you it was a car isolated enroute for being dirty.  Possibly somebody vomited in it.  Once a car cleaner at the terminal cleaned it up, it was good to go.  Happens all the time, every day with all types of equipment.

    ah okay, I thought it was the usual door bs that's been going on. 

  8. Today I was on a R179 on the (A) and car 3257 didn't open... at all. So everyone had to crowd in nearby cars including the one I was in (3256), I wasn't aware what were the last 5 car #s. I even tweeted the MTA twitter and to my surprised I saw the same set going southbound later on and I guess they addressed the issue lmao.. it made me think watch them be kicked out of service.. AGAIN

  9. 1 minute ago, Lawrence St said:

    The R46 can run in however many pairs they want, whether it be 4 cars, 6 cars, 8 cars, even 10 cars!

    it's funny you mention 10 cars because for the LONGEST time I thought they always had 10. Then I found out they (and the R68/As) operate using 8 lol. I kept forgetting about the car lengths as well which is why it was kinda shocking for me.

  10. When I first found out about the new cars my first thought was that the (1)(3)(6) and (S) would get them bc they utilize R62/A... BUT seeing everyones comments about the busiest lines (2)(4)(5)(6) getting them FIRST makes much more sense. As I would love to see my home line (the (1)) getting the R262s, I would rather see the (6)<6> saved first considering CBTC is also planned for the Lex. Avenue line. I just want the design process to be done to basically see an A division style R211 lol. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.