Jump to content

MJHmarc

Veteran Member
  • Posts

    222
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by MJHmarc

  1. 1 hour ago, subwaycommuter1983 said:

    I just hope that the MTA exercises option order 2 not only to make the "C" and "G" full length, but also to eliminate the subway car shortage that has been affecting the B division since the retirement of the r44's and to properly accommodate the growth in ridership.

    Remember their first priority is CBTC and end of life r46’s not fixing car shortages or full length train sets for both lines. That’s an afterthought 

  2. 3 minutes ago, Kamen Rider said:

    East New York can’t even store the cars it already has. There’s at least 5-6 J’s parked in various corners every night.

    again, the relocation of those cars is predicated on the expansion of 207’s inspection barn to hold full length trains, not the arrival of new equipment.

    Everyone seems to forget that this is the reason why the C does not use 10 cars. Also the MTA cares more about how many trains can they put into service vs a spare factor. 

  3. 3 minutes ago, Kamen Rider said:

    East New York can’t even store the cars it already has. There’s at least 5-6 J’s parked in various corners every night.

    again, the relocation of those cars is predicated on the expansion of 207’s inspection barn to hold full length trains, not the arrival of new equipment.

    Everyone seems to forget that this is the reason why the C does not use 10 cars. Also the MTA cares more about how many trains can they put into service vs a spare factor. 

  4. 8 minutes ago, Lawrence St said:

    Can’t we just upgrade Canarsie CBTC to be compatible with the rest of the system? It seems overly complicated to have cars restricted to one line.

    Won’t likely happen as there’s more of a need to roll out new cbtc vs replacing existing ones just for compatibility. Likely the L doesn’t need too many more sets which the cost would likely be less than changing out a system. If eny had enough sets they wouldn’t need to borrow from the L line. This is really all r211 option 2 order talk. 

  5. On 3/15/2024 at 10:59 AM, Comrade96 said:

    Got some potential news from the grapevine, would be nothing too new but as always take it with a grain of salt.

    Car equipment's current plan is to keep the r68s around for around another 8-10 years due to them being purchased with federal funding way back when, so dont expect the 268s for a while. Of course, the car equipment of today will most likely not be the same car equipment a few years from now, as always, grain of salt.....

    I don’t think it’s to anyone surprised the R68’s/A’s will be around for a while and will likely replace the r46’s running on the N Q W. 

  6. 59 minutes ago, RandomRider0101 said:

    Welp, so much for the gangway idea.

    I started growing doubtful the more I learned about these cars, but I was still kinda holding onto hope that some kind of alterations could be made to the sets to make them actually work here at NYCT.

    I hope they can just convert the gangway sets into standard sets. That way, they won't have the trouble of having to keep these cars isolated to a shuttle route.

    Without locking off each car it would not be easy to convert them. 

  7. 12 minutes ago, Lawrence St said:

    These cars were ill advised from the start. I wouldn’t be surprised if they convert them into A units, put them on the Rock (S) or just retire them.

    They would look nice on the G line broken into 4 sets 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.