Jump to content

traildriver

Veteran Member
  • Posts

    554
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by traildriver

  1. I don't see anything wrong with the public having an interest in MTA policy, since much of it directly or indirectly may affect them.  This forum is not only for MTA employees, is it?

    Privacy is indeed a societal issue, nowadays.   A two hundred year old slogan was paraphrased by railroads later into: "Eternal vigilance is the price of safety"..

  2. On 7/27/2023 at 9:28 AM, Chris89292 said:

    Dang, I can’t imagine an R32 operating on SIR tracks

    Agreed...the R-32 and the Verrazano Narrows Bridge, connecting Brooklyn to Staten Island, both went into service in 1964.   The bridge forever ended the possibility of BMT lines trains traveling to and thru Staten Island, which had been proposed via a never built tunnel, earlier.

  3. This also means another reroute for I-95...it no longer use the Scudders Falls Bridge...I-295 is extended to replace it.  And since that bridge was replaced by a new structure last year, it became a toll bridge (collected going from NJ to PA).

    The whole I-95 route issue is silly...right from the beginning, it should have been over the NJTP the entire way, but for political reasons, it was routed through Pennsylvania.  This has always caused confusion for some through travelers, not familiar with the routing.

  4. I am one of those that since one way toll collection began, took advantage of that, by taking the 'free' crossing one way, and taking a cheaper return route.   For example, if traveling from Queens to points south, I would use the Williamsburg Bridge, and Holland Tunnel.  Returning via Outerbridge crossing, and Verrazzano Bridge.

    Or, if going north, via GW Bridge, returning via Tappan Zee or Newburgh-Beacon, depending on destination...

  5. On 7/16/2018 at 7:12 PM, Dj Hammers said:

    Plans can change and in this case, they have slightly. 

    Expect the R42s to go south, but the (A) may keep some R32s.

     

    On 7/16/2018 at 7:43 PM, R32 3838 said:

    I hope the (A) does keep some R32's. Its smart to keep atleast 4-6 sets while the rest go to the (B) and (G) lines. This way its a good balance of 60 footers on the (A)

    Anyone have a good guess of when the R32's will all be retired?   

    Just curious as to how close they may get to the 'Q -type' 66 year longevity record....

    Probably not too close, as they would have to last until 2030!   🙂

  6. What I think they should do, is simply extend the 'free zone' of the Airtrain to the Howard Beach station, so that it replicates the one fare ride that used to exist when it was a bus making the connection.   

    Whether they should do it at Jamaica also, is another matter, with its own pro's and con's.....

  7. Anyone following the holiday traffic drama at LaGuardia Airport?   People having to abandon their rides, and hoof it across the Grand Central Parkway with their bags in an attempt to catch their flights....

    The new terminal construction has resulted in a real traffic gridlock nightmare.   The Port Authority and the MTA should have planned better, and set up a remote dropoff and pickup area, and only allowed buses to cross one of the access bridges into the airport, and serve the various terminals....or some such plan.....

  8. Got a big surprise on my way home from work, yesterday....when I came out of the Forest Hills subway station, there on the Q-64 was an articulated...

    Another passenger told me he had one a few weeks ago, but this was new to me.

     

    It didn't take long for the Queens College bound student's to notice and promptly plug their phones into the overhead USB receptacles....  :)

  9. Don't know about that. Good idea, but I would have it go to NJ.

     

    Maybe an (L) extension to 72 Street via 10 Avenue?

     

    What? Too much foaming.....? I'll tone it down....

    I like your idea of sending the 'L' train north....

    As for sending the '7' train to NJ, I don't know....first of all, they already have constructed the line south on 11th avenue.  Would you suggest they abandon that extension, or run the 7 to both 34th and to NJ on alternate trips?

    Second, it would open up a 'can of worms' bureaucratically as to funding and operating responsibilites.  While the PATH line is there just for that purpose, and MTA's commuter line, MN does deal with operations in NJ and Connecticut, for the subway to take that step would be a whole 'nother matter....

  10. Pardon me if someone already suggested it.  (Too long to read thru it all), but how about extending the new 7 line extension to South Ferry?

    Since the new extension yard will already reach 26th street and 11th avenue, I propose continuing down 11th/West Street with stops at 23rd St., 14th st., Christopher St., (possible PATH connection), Houston St., Canal St., Chambers St., World Trade Center (connection with PATH, 1, and E), Rector St., and South Ferry.

    An alternate would be to curve it eastward along Chambers St. to connect it directly into the 1,2,3 line at Chambers or Rector, and replace or supplement the 1  train to South Ferry....

  11. As mentioned, its probably due to tradition. Locomotive Engineers and Firemen on railroads never wore formal uniforms in North America. Even when engineers manned the controls of electric MU cars, they are still considered 'enginemen.

    In the steam days, they donned 'de-facto' uniforms of striped bib overalls, cap, and bandana, along with their Hamilton 992 pocket watches, etc.

     

    Someone mentioned wearing a suit. I have seen enginemen in Metroliner cabs years ago have enough pride in their job to wear at least a tie and sport jacket, on their own.

     

    That said, I think it would look more professional if the railroads provided at least a nice uniform coverall for engineers to wear on the job.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.