Jump to content

EphraimB

Veteran Member
  • Posts

    287
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by EphraimB

  1. 51 minutes ago, NoHacksJustKhaks said:

    The Lefferts Blvd section of the (A) has more ridership than both Rockaway Branches combined. Can you imagine that many people clogging the streets on a daily basis? Even with buses, traffic will be a nightmare and accessibility for those impaired will be greatly reduced... 

    Nobody wants to walk 20 min to their nearest stop, consider that’s the reason you were so passionate about the Reeds Lane proposal!

    My 20-minute walk is still doable. A 3 hour and 11 minute walk isn't.

  2. 5 minutes ago, LaGuardia Link N Tra said:

    Well, people will riot if you get rid of Lefferts (A) service. So one idea that I've been seeing recently from these forums is to send some (C) trains to Rockaway Park. Therefore, thisll grant the Rockaways more service while meeting Ridership Demands. 

    Is it possible to tamper with the switch by Rockaway Blvd to temporarily make (A) trains go only to Far Rockaway?

  3. 1 minute ago, LaGuardia Link N Tra said:

    Well, when you think of it, there's more demand for service to Lefferts. You see the (MTA) has this ..... "Corrupt". Culture of:

    Less ridership > cut service > even less ridership > repeat cycle

    I remember a couple of incidents that there was 3 Lefferts Blvd (A) trains one after another and that the next Far Rockaway bound (A) train was in around 45 minutes. Is there any way to disable the switch at Rockaway Blvd to only allow (A) trains to go to Far Rockaway? It's only a 20 minute walk from Rockaway Blvd to Lefferts Blvd.

  4. 3 minutes ago, R68OnBroadway said:

    It's nice and all that they are fixing these broke timers, but do we really need a lot of them at all? We used to operate a system without speedometers and to be fair we did well... Union Sq could be prevented if Ray wasn't allowed to operate the train in the first place, and Williamsburg's potential effects could have been fixed by simply adding timers in the most vulnerable places... it's rather sad when it takes more time to get from 125th to 42nd on CPW/8th than 7th.

    Also, do they really require trains to stop at Myrtle/right off the bridge in order to be routed through DeKalb? Can't they look at CCTV from the stops themselves? The (Q) crawls so slow through the area that you can see the individual slits in Masstransiscope. It's ridiculous. 

    What is Masstransiscope?

  5. 4 minutes ago, Via Garibaldi 8 said:

    Looks like last Tuesday during that big downpour we had.

    ...and onto the train... Just imagine you're texting and boom outta nowhere a gush of water all over you. LOL

    I've seen photos from Penn Station that were crazy too. Whole platform just flooded with water from above.

    There wasn't a downpour in Far Rockaway. I was surprised when I saw those photos of stations flooded.

  6. Someone we knew drove me and my mother home and we were faster than a R160 (M) train on the Williamsburg Bridge. It would take 1 hour and 15 minutes to take the (F) to the (A) home to Far Rockaway. I was surprised to see that it only took 37 minutes to get home by car.

    fxPRG1C.jpg

    Why can't the trains be faster?

  7. 20 minutes ago, B35 via Church said:

    The first post of yours I actually don't have a problem with...

    Pun unintended, but sometimes you gotta talk with your feet.... I did just that with my old morning commute & are no longer taking public transportation to do so.... If you're tired of walking 1+ miles or whatever every day, there has to be something you can think of to make life easier... Invest in a bike, or have someone (relative, close friend) drop you off at the train station, something... There's more people than you might think that are doing the latter of the two (for more reasons than just quelling the amt. of daily walking)....

    side note: that's a pretty impressive walking speed....

    Everyone else drives to work or drives to the LIRR at an earlier time. I have a part-time job. Starting October 3rd, I'm working from 10AM-4PM. No one is available at those times. My bike's left gears are broken.

  8. 7 minutes ago, Around the Horn said:

    In a move that I cannot explain, it appears that Cortlandt Street on the (1) will be renamed "World Trade Center" as they've started putting up the signs on the platform

    39929236_1835762589832997_41975259770912

    Hmm... Looks like my future subway maps are true. Looking forward to the (A) getting extended to Reads Lane!

  9. 27 minutes ago, Around the Horn said:

    The mistake you made here was getting off the train in frustration... I've been on plenty of local (N) trains (and even a local (Q)). Yeah its annoying to sit through the local stops but at least you're getting there.

    Dispatchers send whatever train is first local. I do think they ideally they'd make a Lefferts train local, but if the first train is to the Rockaways, they don't have much choice. It's not some conspiracy to make Rockaway trains late.

    Why don't they have much choice? After a Lefferts Blvd (A) train passed by my (A) train express, there was 2 more Lefferts Blvd (A) trains. That was 3 Lefferts Blvd (A) trains in a row.

  10. I was so pissed off from my train ride home from Samsung 837 today. What happened was I got on the (A) train at 14 St. When the train got to Jay St-MetroTech, they announced "Due to delays in (C) train service, this Queens-bound (A) train is going local". When the train got to Clinton-Washington Av, a Lefferts Blvd-bound (A) train bypassed my Rockaway Park-bound (A) train. It was very unfair to me since it's much longer to get to the Rockaways than it is to get to Lefferts Blvd. They should have made the Lefferts Blvd-bound (A) train behind my (A) train go local instead. I was angry enough that I got off at Nostrand Av and checked when the next Rockaway Park-bound (A) train was and it was a half an hour away. I then attempted to go uptown so I wouldn't be waiting on a hot platform but there wasn't any crossover. I went out of the station and crossed Nostrand Av, entered the station on the other side of the street, swiped my monthly metrocard at the turnstile and got in but I was still on the downtown platform. I took a Lefferts Blvd-bound (A) train to Utica Av (that went express) and got off. I checked the countdown clocks and it said that the next Rockaway Park (A) train was 25 minutes away. Utica Av has a crossover so I went to the uptown platform, waited 5 minutes for a Manhattan-bound (A) train and took it to Hoyt-Schermerhorn St. At Hoyt-Schermerhorn St, I got off and went to the downtown platform. 1 minute later, a Rockaway Park-bound (A) train came and luckily went express.

     

    I got off at Beach 90 St to catch the (S) to Far Rockaway but right when the (A) train arrived at Beach 90 St, the (S) to Far Rockaway closed its doors and left. I had to wait 15 minutes for the next (S) to Far Rockaway. 10 minutes later another (A) train arrived at Beach 90 St dumping more people onto the platform. It was very unfair. The (S) to Far Rockaway finally came and I went in the last car because it was the least crowded but still a lot of people. When the (S) got to Far Rockaway, I checked the MTA Bus Time app for the next bus going towards my house and it said 15 minutes. It wasn't worth waiting 15 minutes for a bus which only drives me 8 out of 20 minutes of the way so I walked home.

     

    Yesterday, my Rockaway Park-bound (A) train went local as well with the same "Due to delays in (C) train service, this Queens-bound (A) train is going local". The (MTA) is treating Rockaway customers second-class. This needs to stop!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.