Jump to content

transitfan111

Senior Member
  • Posts

    77
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by transitfan111

  1. 13 hours ago, Lex said:

    It's not really an issue on weekends, but on weekdays, loads of people are riding, and 18 peak trains are just barely enough to handle Nostrand Avenue service. (The (5) picks up the better part of its ridership along just that stretch, while most who take the (2) transfer at Franklin Avenue, thereby balancing the loads. For what it's worth, the (2) still retains some number of passengers.)

    Perhaps a proper extension would help. After all, Nostrand Avenue still has untapped potential.

    This is exactly why a 5 to Utica Avenue will never work. Franklin Avenue will never be able to handle the number of passengers on the platforms.

    People keep talking about Rogers Junction, yet they know nothing about that area.

    Flatbush terminal is the bigger problem.

  2. 3 hours ago, Jchambers2120 said:

     

    @Trainmaster5 I couldn't agree more. I don't care if i lived next door to Pelham, Parkchester or VC. I would NEVER willingly pick a job on the 1 or 6. The is just stressful from heavy ridership, the 1 has similar ridership and you're in and out all day with little recovery time. People look at me like I'm crazy when I say I'd rather two on the duece over 3 on the 1. Atleast you can make money over there.

    I’m a bit confused here. Do train operators make money based on the number of trips they made or is it based on number of hours they are on duty?

  3. 15 hours ago, MysteriousBtrain said:

    Without taking Hudson yards into consideration, does anyone think it's possible to have the (7) extend to 12 cars or two 6 car sets in order to improve on maintenance and car consistency?

     

    You have to purchase new cars, extend platforms, reconfigure some signals, etc and it’ll be more expensive (or about the same) than just fixing the Main Street terminal which is the real chockpoint. It takes trains forever to get in there. 

  4. Why was bucket seating removed from the newer train cars? 

    1. Bucket seating discourages the homeless from sleeping in train cars

    2. If someone spills a drink, the spill is contained to one seat

    3. Bucket seating forces fat people to stick to their own seat

     

    I hate it when fat people sit next to me

     

  5. Just now, EphraimB said:

    If I get a yearly, then a citibike would be $149 a year which would make it cheaper than a subway.

    Well then you would have to debate on whether or not it is worth leaving early to bike to your destination. All depends on how you value your time. 

    Also depends on where you are going. i.e. you don't want to show up to work sweaty or tired right?

    Then there is the risk of getting injured riding a bike. It will happen, especially in the city.

    Fyi don't bike when it rains, snows, hurricanes, etc

    I would just use the subway

     

     

  6. 16 hours ago, Porter said:

    Someone on a weekday afternoon smoked crack on the Fulton (2)(3) platform right in front of an (MTA) employee, who ignored it. What the hell is going on?

    Frankly, if you were a MTA employee would you say something? I think people just want to stay out of confrontation. Let the cops handle it.

  7. 3 minutes ago, EphraimB said:

    My father told me that biking is a bad idea and too dangerous because I need a helmet and there's crazy taxis in the city.

    Using Citi Bike costs more than a subway fare. I don't see a reason to bike other than exercise.

    Don't recommend biking at all, drivers here are crazy.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.